Skip to main content
  • 1051 Accesses

Abstract

First Nuclear Reactor in Oklo. Earth’s first heat-producing nuclear reactor was accomplished without the assistance of humans. It produced 100 kW for 150,000 years, 1.8 billion years ago in Oklo, Gabon. The residue of fission fragments in the soil and the reduction in 235U content from 0.7 to 0.4 % proves the hypothesis. This happened without cooling pumps, fuel-rods and emergency-core-cooling systems. This natural thermal reactor operated merely because a good, rich deposit of uranium was concentrated in a watery estuary. Natural-uranium at that time was 4 % 235U, before it decayed to today’s 0.7 %. Water was needed to place uranium into solution, carry it downstream and concentrate it the estuary basin. This multi-step process concentrated the moderately rare uranium into a robust uranium ore. Water also slowed (moderated) high-energy fission neutrons to low velocities, to enhance the probability to fission. A reactor needs only a good concentration of fissionable materials (235U, 233U, 239Pu) in a reasonable geometry, with a moderator (H2O, D2O, graphite). No nuclear engineers were needed for the Oklo nuclear reactor.

The ingenuity of our scientists will provide special safe conditions under which such a bank of fissionable material can be made essentially immune to surprise seizure.

[President Dwight Eisenhower, UN Atoms for Peace Speech, 8 December 1953]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hollister and Nadis (1998).

  2. 2.

    Ahearn (2006), Piore (2011).

  3. 3.

    NuScale Power, Corvallis Oregon.

  4. 4.

    The two atomic bombs dropped on Japan had quite different characteristics.

    Hiroshima at 1000 m, gamma ray dose = neutron dose = 3 gray.

    Nagasaki at 1000 m, gamma ray dose = 10 gray, neutron dose = 1 gray.

    Peterson and Abrahamson (1998).

  5. 5.

    Rate of decay:

    1 curie (radiation from 1 g of radium) = 1 Ci = 3.7 × 1010 decay/s.

    1 bequerel (SI) = 1 Bq = 1 decay/s.

    Absorbed energy in air:

    1 roentgen = 1 R = 87 ergs/g = 0.0087 J/kg.

    Physical dose of absorbed energy:

    1 rad = 100 erg/g = 0.01 J/kg.

    1 gray (SI) = 1 Gy = 1 J/kg = 100 rad.

    Biological dose equivalent is absorbed dose times a relative biological effectiveness Q.

    X-rays, γ-rays, and electrons have Q = 1, neutrons have Q = 5–20 and alpha particles and fission fragments have Q = 20.

    1 Roentgen equivalent man (rem) = 0.01 J/kg.

    1 sievert (SI) = 1 Sv = 1 J/kg = 100 rem.

Bibliography

  • Ahearn, J. (2006, April). Advanced nuclear reactors: Their use in future energy supply. Physics and Society, 35, 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahearne, J., et al. (1997). Nuclear waste issues. Physics Today, 50, 22–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alverez, R., et al. (2003). Reducing the hazards from stored spent power reactor fuel in the United States. Science Global Security, 11, 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Physical Society. (1975, Summer). Light–water reactor safety. Reviews of Modern Physics 47(S1), S1–S124.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Physical Society. (1978, January). Nuclear fuel cycles and waste management. Reviews of Modern Physics 50(1), S1–S186.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Physical Society. (1985, July). Radioactive release from severe accidents at nuclear power plants. Reviews of Modern Physics 57(3), S1–S154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkenbus, J., & Forsberg, C. (1995). Internationalizing nuclear safety. Annual Review of Energy Environment, 20, 179–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodansky, D. (1996). Nuclear energy. NY: AIP Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boeker, E., & Grondelle, R. (1995). Environmental physics. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bupp, I., & Derian, J. (1978). Light water. NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, P. (1999). High-level nuclear waste: The status of Yucca mountain. Annual Review of Energy Environment, 24, 461–486.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., & Ahearne, J. (2002). Managing the legacy of US nuclear-weapons production. American Scientist, 90, 514–523.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fetter, S., & von Hippel, F. (1990). The hazard from plutonium dispersal by nuclear-warhead accidents. Science Global Security, 2, 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, F., & Slovic, P. (1995). Yucca mountain: Prospects for America’s high-level nuclear waste program. Annual Review of Energy Environment, 20, 83–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golay, M. (1993). Advanced fission power reactors. Annual Review of Particle Science, 43, 297–332.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker, S. (1995). Radiation protection and the human radiation experiments. Los Alamos Science 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollister, C., Anderson, D., & Heath, G. (1981). Sub-seabed disposal of nuclear wastes. Science, 213, 1321–1326.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollister, C., & Nadis, S. (1998, January). Burial of radioactive waste under the seabed. Scientific American, 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeny, S., et al. (1977). Nuclear power: Issues and choices. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, A. (2001). Interim storage of spent fuel in the United States. Annual Review of Energy & Environment, 26, 201–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G., & Levin, A. (2002). New designs for the nuclear renaissance. Physics Today, 55(4), 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2014). Lessons learned from the Fukushima nuclear accident for improving safety of US nuclear plants. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nero, A. (1979). Guidebook to nuclear reactors. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (1975). Reactor safety study (Rasmussen). Washington, DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office Technology Assessment. (1991). Complex cleanup: The environmental legacy of nuclear weapons production. Washington, DC: OTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, L., & Abrahamson, S. (Eds.). (1998). Effects of ionizing radiation: Atomic bomb survivors and their children. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, A. (2011, June). Nuclear energy. Scientific American, 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, N. (1981). The application of probabilistic risk assessment techniques to energy technologies. Annual Review of Energy Environment, 6, 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R., Shawand, R., & Stahlkopf, K. (1985). Decommissioning of commercial nuclear power plants. Annual Review of Energy Environment, 10, 251–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schillaci, M. (1995). Radiation and risk (UNSCEAR94 data). Los Alamos Science, 23, 104–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (1999). Effects of ionizing radiation at low doses. American Journal of Physics, 67, 322–327.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Hafemeister .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hafemeister, D. (2016). Nuclear Reactors and Radiation. In: Nuclear Proliferation and Terrorism in the Post-9/11 World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25367-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics