Advertisement

Markov Models of Pipeline Degradation Process

  • Sviatoslav TimashevEmail author
  • Anna Bushinskaya
Chapter
Part of the Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality book series (TSRQ, volume 30)

Abstract

Presentation of a pipeline system in the form of series-connected defective cross sections (see Sect.  6.6) is not always applicable in practice. When using this scheme, the probability of failure of the whole system is equal to unity minus the product of the probability of failure-free operation of all its elements. The reliability index of such a system is low compared to the reliability of its elements and, given an increase in the number of elements (defects), the system is drastically reduced, even when the reliability of each element is high (see Sect.  2.6).

Keywords

Markov Process Residual Strength Pipeline System Defect Depth Corrosion Defect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    RD 09–102–95. Guidance on the Definition of the Residual Life of Potentially Dangerous Objects, Supervised by Federal Environmental, Industrial and Nuclear Supervision Service. Approved. 17.10.1995 (Moscow, 1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    SNIP 2.05.06-85*. Building Codes and Regulations, Russian Federation: Main Pipelines: Approved by the USSR State 01.01.86. Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Center of design products” (Moscow, 2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    RD 03-421-01. Guidelines for the Diagnostics of Technical Condition and Residual Life of Vessels and Apparatuses. NTTS “PB” (Moscow, 2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    STO 0–13–28–2006. Methodology of Assessing the Potential Hazard and Residual Life of Pipelines with Corrosion Defects and Discontinuities in Welds and Parent Metal, Detected During ILI. OrenburgGasprom (Orenburg, 2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    STO 0–03–22–2008. Technological Safety of Operation of Pipelines Pumping Gas Containing Sulphur Hydrogen, and Pipelines Carrying Unstable Condensate. VNIIGAZ (Orenburg, 2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.V. Bushinskaya, Description of pipeline strength degradation as a pure death markov process and its implementation in IMP, in Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference, Paper 31275 (Calgary, Canada, September, 2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L.V. Poluyan, A.V. Bushinskaya, M.G. Malyukova, S.A. Timashev, Reliability based inspection and maintenance of pipelines with markov type corrosion defects growth, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Safety & Reliability, Paper 0156 (Japan, 2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S.A. Timashev, Reliability of Large Mechanical Systems (Nauka, Moscow, 1982)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.A. Timashev, M.G. Malyukova, L.V. Poluian, A.V. Bushinskaya, Markov description of corrosion defects growtn and its application to reliability based maintenance of pipeline, in Proceedings of the Rio Pipeline Conference and Exposition (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.S. Ventsel, Theory of Probabilities (Nauka, Moscow, 1969). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E.S. Ventsel, L.A. Ovcharov, Theory of Stochastic Processes and its Engineering Applications. Textbook for Higher Technical Schools (Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow, 2000). (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian Academy of SciencesUral Federal UniversityYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations