Advertisement

Methods of ILI Results Analysis

  • Sviatoslav TimashevEmail author
  • Anna Bushinskaya
Chapter
Part of the Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality book series (TSRQ, volume 30)

Abstract

This chapter contains a systemic description of the methodology for integrated holistic analysis of statistical data obtained as a result of pipelines inspection for the purpose of their practical applications when ensuring safety and integrity of pipelines. To begin with, we introduce some definitions.

References

  1. 1.
    API 1163 Standard, In-Line Inspection Systems Qualification Standard, 1st edn. (American Petroleum Institute, Washington, 2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Chris, Legal issues in pipeline integrity programs, in Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Conference (Houston, 2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Caleyo, L. Alfonso, et al., Statistical method for the calibration of pipeline in-line inspection data, in Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Conference (Houston, 2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.A.F. Seber, Linear Regression Analysis Translation from English (Mir, Moscow, 1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.A. Timashev, A.V. Bushinskaya, Diligent statistical analysis of ili data: implications, inferences and lesson learned, in Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Conference, Houston, 2009Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.G. Worthingham, T.B. Morrison, et al., Bayesian estimates of measurement error for in- line inspection and field tools, in International Pipeline Conference (2002), p. 27263Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    API 1160 Standard, Managing System Integrity for Hazardous Liquid Pipelines, 1st edn. (American Petroleum Institute, Washington, 2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.H. Vieth, S.W. Rust, E.R, Johnson, Statistical analysis methods for ILI metal-loss data, in Proceedings of the International Pipeline Pigging Conference and Exhibition, vol. 10 (Houston, 1998), pp. 20–30Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V.S. Pugachev, Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics (Nauka, Moscow, 1979)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ASME B31G-1991 American national standard, Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines: A Supplement to ASME B31 Code for Pressure Piping. Revision of ANSI/ASME B31G-1984 (ASME, New York, 1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.F. Kiefner, P.H. Vieth, Rstreng-2 (Modified B31G). A Modified Criterion for Evaluating the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipe. Final Report on Project PR 3-805. Pipeline Research Committee (American Gas Association, Ohio, 1989)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    DNV-RP-F101 Recommended Practice, Corroded Pipelines (Det Norske Veritas, Norway, 2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.A. Timashev, A.N. Tyrsin, T.A. Makarova, Increasing the reliability of measurement results of in-line inspection tools. Control and Diagnostics. 6, 13–17 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patent 2169308 of Russian Federation. F17D5 / 02. A method of in-line inspection. No 99125793/06; appl. 02.12.1999; publ. 20.06.2001, Bull. number 17Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Morrison, N.S. Mangat, L.B. Carroll, J. Riznic, Statistical estimation of flaw size measurement errors for steam generator inspection tools, in Proceedings of 4th International Steam Generator and Heat Exchanger Conference, Toronto, 2002Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y.A.R. Magnus, P.K. Katyshev, A.A. Peresetskiy, Econometrics. Initial Course: Textbook (Delo, Moscow, 2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C.L. Cheng, J. Van Ness, Statistical Regression with Measurement Error: Kendall’s Library of Statistics 6 (Arnold (co-published by NY: Oxford University Press), London, 1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S.A. Timashev, A.N. Tyrsin, Construction of linear regression model based on entropy approach. Plant Lab. Diagn. Mater. 75(3), 66–69 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Shennon, The Works on Information Theory and Cybernetics: Translation from English (Izd-vo inostr. lit., Moscow, 1963)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V.I. Mudrov, V.L. Kushko, Methods of Measurement Processing. Quasi Plausible Estimates (Radio i svyaz, Moscow, 1983)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    F.E. Grubbs, On estimating precision of measuring instruments and product variability. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 43, 243–264 (1948)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    W.A. Thompson Jr, The problem of negative estimates of variance components. Ann. Stat. 33, 273–289 (1962)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.W. Gillard, T.C. Iles, Method of Moments Estimation in Linear Regression with Errors in Both Variables, Cardiff University School of Mathematics Technical Paper (Cardiff University School of Mathematics, Cardiff, 2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J.L. Jaech, Statistical Analysis of Measurement Errors (Wiley, New York, 1985)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    A.I. Kobzar, Applied Mathematical Statistics. For Engineers and Scientists. (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Bhatia, T.B. Morrison, N.S. Mangat, Estimation of measurement errors, in International Pipeline Conference, vol.1 (ASME International, 1998), pp. 315–325Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A.V. Bushinskaya, S.A. Timashev, Statistical analysis of ILI data for optimal pipeline integrity management, in Proceedings of All Russia Conference and School “Safety of Critical Infrastructures and Territories” (Ekaterinburg, 2008), pp. 80–81Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    W.A. Fuller, Measurement Error Models (Wiley, New York, 1987)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    S.A. Timashev, A.V. Bushinskaya, Holistic statistical analysis of structural defects inspection results, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Safety & Reliability Conference (Osaka, 2009), p. 0773Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    R. Khattree, C.R. Rao, Handbook of Statistics: Statistics in Industry, vol. 22(Edited) (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    L.R. LaMotte, On non-negative quadratic unbiased estimation of variance components. Am. Stat. Assoc. 68, 728–730 (1973)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    C.R. Rao, Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, 2nd edn. (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1973)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    R. Khattree, Some practical estimation procedures for variance components. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 28, 1–32 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    R. Khattree, Nonnegative estimation of variance components: a modification to henderson’s anova methodology. Indian J. Stat. 61, 261–265 (1999)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    C.K. Liew, Inequality constrained least squares estimation. Am. Stat. Assoc. 71, 746–751 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    H.O. Madsen, R.K. Skong, A.G. Tallin, F. Kirkemo, Probabilistic fatigue crack growth analysis of offshore structures with reliability updating through inspection, in Marine Structure Reliability Symposium (1987)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. Rouhan, F. Schoefs, Probabilistic modeling of inspection results for offshore structures. Struct. Saf. 25, 379–399 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    J.R. Rudlin, W.D. Dover, The icon database: assisting underwater inspections. Offshore Technol. 4, 33–34 (1996)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    B.P. Carlin, T.A. Louis, Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis, 3rd edn. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    D. Gamerman, Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference (Chapman and Hall/CRC, London, 1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    A. Gelman, J. Caerlin, H. Stern, D. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis (Chapman and Hall/CRC, London, 1996)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    M.S. Hamada, A.G. Wilson, C.C. Reese, H.F. Martz, Bayesian Reliability. Springer Series in Statistics (Springer, New York, 2008)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    C. Howson, P. Urbach, Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, 3rd edn. (Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago, 2005)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    J.Q. Smith, Decision Analysis—A Bayesian Approach (Chapman and Hall, London, 1995)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    S.A. Timashev, A.B. Kuzmin, A powerful tool for assessing locations of defects missed-out by ili, in Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, 2004Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    V.V. Kuznetsov, M.G. Malyukova, S.A. Timashev, Bayesian update of number of defects present in the pipeline, in Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference, Paper no 31204, Calgary, 2010Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    F. Schoefs, J. Boero, Effect of the shape of roc curves on risk based inspection: a parametric study, in Safety, Reliability and Risk of Structures, Infrastructures and Engineering Systems: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, ed. by H. Furuta, M. Frangopol Dan, M. Shinozuka (Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2010), pp. 360–361Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    W. Visser, G. Britain, POD/POS curves for non-destructive examination. Offshore Technology Report 2000/018 (HSE Books, 2002)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    N. Paklin, Logistic regression and roc-analysis - mathematical apparatus. BaseGroup LabsGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    S.A. Timashev, M.G. Malyukova, V.V. Kuznetsov, Construction of roc-curve based on a sample of inspection results of pipeline segment, in Safety of-critical Infrastructures and Territories: III All-russia Scientific and Engineering Conference and Symposium. XIII School for Young Scientists (Yekaterinburg, 2011), pp. 216–217Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    STO Gazprom 2-2.3-112-2007, Guidelines for Assessment of Working Capacity of Pipelines Sections with Corrosion Defects (IRTS “Gazprom”, Moscow, 2007)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    G. Kramer, Mathematical Methods of Statistics (Mir, Moscow, 1975)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian Academy of SciencesUral Federal UniversityYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations