Skip to main content

An Ontology Design Pattern to Represent False-Results

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1800 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9381))

Abstract

Observations are an important aspect of our society. Arguably, great part of them is captured by means of sensors. Despite the importance of the matter, the ontology of observations and sensors is not well developed, with few efforts dealing with the fundamental questions about their nature. As a result, an important aspect of sensors is overlooked: sensors may fail, producing false-results (i.e. false-positives and false-negatives). The lack of a proper representation of this aspect prevents us from communicating and reasoning about sensor failures, making it harder to assess the correctness of observations and to treat possible errors. In view of this problem, we propose an ontology design pattern (ODP) to represent false-results of sensors. It covers a special case of sensor that exclusively produces positive or negative results regarding the presence of the type of entity the sensor is designed to perceive. The paper introduces the ODP structure as well as its ontological commitments, bringing an example from the biomedical field. Discussion and further research opportunities of research are posed at the end of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ceruti, M.G.: Ontology for level-one sensor fusion and knowledge discovery. In: International Knowledge Discovery and Ontology Workshop (KDO), pp. 97–102, Pisa, Italy (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Janowicz, K., Compton, M.: The stimulus-sensor-observation ontology design pattern and its integration into the semantic sensor network ontology. In: Taylor, K., Ayyagari, A., De Roure, D. (eds.) The 3rd International workshop on Semantic Sensor Networks 2010 (SSN10) in Conjunction with the 9th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2010), Shanghai, China (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neuhaus, H., Compton, M.: The semantic sensor network ontology: a generic language to describe sensor assets. In AGILE Workshop: Challenges in Geospatial Data Harmonisation (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kuhn, W.: A functional ontology of observation and measurement. In: Janowicz, K., Raubal, M., Levashkin, S. (eds.) GeoS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5892, pp. 26–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Calder, M., Morris, R., Peri, F.: Machine reasoning about anomalous sensor data. In: International Conference on Ecological Informatics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Matheus, C.J., Tribble, D., Kokar, M.M., Ceruti, M.G., McGirr, S.C.: Towards a formal pedigree ontology for level-one sensor fusion. In: 10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Russomanno, D., Kothari, C., Thomas, O.: Sensor ontologies: from shallow to deep models. In: 37th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Witt, K.J., Stanley, J., Smithbauer, D., Mandl, D., Ly, V., Underbrink, A., Metheny, M.: Enabling sensor webs by utilizing SWAMO for autonomous operations. In: 8th NASA Earth Science Technology Conference (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Avancha, S., Patel, C., Joshi, A.: Ontology-driven adaptive sensor networks. In: 1st Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems, Networking and Services (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eid, M., Liscano, R., Saddik, A.E.: A universal ontology for sensor networks data. In: IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, J., Kwon, H., Kim, D., Kwak, H., Lee, S.: Building a service-oriented ontology for wireless sensor networks. In: 7th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amato, F., Casola, V., Gaglione, A., Mazzeo, A.: A semantic enriched data model for sensor network interoperability. In: Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, pp. 1–16. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sheth, A., Henson, C., Sahoo, S.: Semantic sensor web. In: IEEE Internet Computing, p. 78–83 (2008) [NÃO MAIS USADA – DELETAR !!!]

    Google Scholar 

  14. Henry, M.P., Clarke, D.W.: The self-validating sensor: rationale, definitions and examples. Control Eng. Pract. 1(4), 585–610 (1993). Pergamon Press, GB

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma, D., Yadav, U.B., Sharma, P.: The concept of sensitivity and specificity in relation to two types of errors and its application in medical research. J. Reliab. Stat. Stud. 2(2), 53–58 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gangemi, A.: Ontology design patterns for semantic web content. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 262–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Guizzardi, G. Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models. PhD thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lozano, J., Carbonera, J.L., Abel, M., Pimenta, M.: Ontology view extraction: an approach based on ontological meta-properties. In: Proceedings of ICTAI 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., de Almeida Falbo, R., Guizzardi, R.S.S., Almeida, J.P.A.: Towards ontological foundations for the conceptual modeling of events. In: Ng, W., Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2013. LNCS, vol. 8217, pp. 327–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Strasinger, S.K., Di Lorenzo, M.S.: Urinalysis and Body Fluids, 5th edn. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Corcho, O., García-Castro, R.: Five challenges for the semantic sensor web. Semantic Web 1, 121–125 (2010). IOS Press

    Google Scholar 

  22. Benevides, A.B., Guizzardi, G.: A model-based tool for conceptual modeling and domain ontology engineering in OntoUML. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) Enterprise Information Systems. LNBIP, vol. 24, pp. 528–538. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Probst, F.: Ontological analysis of observations and measurements. In: Raubal, M., Miller, H.J., Frank, A.U., Goodchild, M.F. (eds.) GIScience 2006. LNCS, vol. 4197, pp. 304–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Mara Abel and Joel L. Carbonera for the great help. This work was partially supported by CAPES (project Pró-Ensino na Saúde - n 39).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrício Henrique Rodrigues .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rodrigues, F.H., Poloni, J.A.T., Flores, C.D., Rotta, L.N. (2015). An Ontology Design Pattern to Represent False-Results. In: Johannesson, P., Lee, M., Liddle, S., Opdahl, A., Pastor López, Ó. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9381. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25263-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25264-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics