Skip to main content

The Identification of Relations Between Smart Specialization and Sensitivity to Crisis in the European Union Regions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Analysis of Large and Complex Data
  • 2179 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of the article is an attempt to measure and assess the sensitivity to crisis of the European Union regional economies having considered their sector structure. The research results presented in literature references indicate that the differences in sector structure of particular economies were the main reason of diverse crisis consequences. The study covered the NUTS-2 level regions in the period 2005–2011. Econometric models for panel data with adequate estimation techniques are used for the assessment of the EU regions’ sensitivity to the effects of 2008 crisis. The application of panel data allows for including in the analysis also the specific, non-measurable, individual effects for particular regions and time, what seems a particularly useful tool for the description of regional economies growth in the crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arellano, M. (2003). Panel data econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Danska, B. (2000). Przestrzenno-czasowe modelowanie zmian w działalności produkcyjnej w Polsce. Zatosowanie modeli panelowych. Absolwent, Łódź.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010). A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Communication from the Commission EUROPE 2020, Brussels, 3.3.2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorzelak, G. (2009). Geografia polskiego kryzysu. Kryzys peryferii czy peryferia kryzysu [The geography of Polish crisis. The crisis of periphery or the periphery of crisis]. Warszawa: Regional Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot, S. T. P., Mohlmann, J. L., Garretsen, J. H., & de Groot, H. L. F. (2011). The crisis sensitivity of European countries and regions: Stylized facts and spatial heterogeneity. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 4(3), 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaegers, T., Lipp-Lingua, C., & Amil, D. (2013). High-technology and medium-high technology industries main drivers of EU-27’s industrial growth. Eurostat, Statistics in Focus 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (2006). Ekonometria. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N., Pomer, D., & Weil, D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Markowska, M. (2013). Ocena zależności miedzy rozwojem inteligentnym a odpornoscia na kryzys ekonomiczny w wymiarze regionalnym – przeglad badań, (The assessment of relations between smart growth and resistance to economic crisis in regional dimension—research review, The Conference entitled Local economy in theory and practice), Mysłakowice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowska M., & Strahl D. (2013), Klasyfikacja europejskiej przestrzeni regionalnej ze wzgledu na filar inteligentnego rozwoju. In Pawełek, B. (red). Zastosowanie metod ilościowych i jakościowych w modelowaniu i prognozowaniu zjawisk społeczno-gospodarczych. (s. 201–219). Kraków: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. (1961). Empirical production functions free of management bias. Journal of Farm Economics, 43(1), 44–56. doi:10.2307/1235460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, M. (2000). A guide to modern econometric. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Project has been financed by the Polish National Centre for Science, decision DEC-2013/09/B/HS4/00509.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beata Bal-Domańska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bal-Domańska, B. (2016). The Identification of Relations Between Smart Specialization and Sensitivity to Crisis in the European Union Regions. In: Wilhelm, A., Kestler, H. (eds) Analysis of Large and Complex Data. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25226-1_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics