Skip to main content

Neoliberalism and the Production of Enemies: The Commercial Logic of Yahoo! News

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neoliberalism, Economic Radicalism, and the Normalization of Violence

Abstract

The study of commercial media offers one of the best ways to gain an understanding of the role of violence in contemporary society, not in terms of an instrumental concern with “the effects” of violence on individuals, though this question has some limited importance, but rather in the sense of how, within the contemporary neoliberal context, media systematically normalize and justify violence as an outcome of their commercial organization. Such an approach focuses on several aspects of how media operate including (1) how commercial media collapse the distinction between news, entertainment, and advertising, (2) how conceptualizing audiences as commodities leads to their segmentation and isolation, (3) how this process of segmentation breaks down the possibility of reasonable democratic deliberation while (4) reinforcing biases and other polarizing dynamics among audiences, (5) how violence and the production of enemies serve useful marketing goals within commercial content, and (6) the role of commercial media in the broader neoliberal political economy. This chapter examines these intertwined questions by taking Yahoo! News as a case study of commercialized media content and exemplar of contemporary sophism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Washington Times was founded by the Unification Church of Korea a specifically an anti-communist “news” paper.

References

  • Bagdikian, B. H. (2004). The new media monopoly. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basney, B. (2014). Brands as publishers: Using content and paid media to fuel a brand transformation. Journal of Brand Strategy, 3(2), 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorstin, D. J. (1971). The image: A guide to pseudo-events in America. New York: Atheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009). YouTube. Malden: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2002). Media control: The spectacular achievements of propaganda (2nd edn.). New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, K., Tewksbury, D., Bond, B. J., Drogos, K. L., Porter, R. W., Yahn, A., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of Communication, 58, 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordelia, F. (2006). A mind of its own: How your brain distorts and deceives. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, P., & Kramer, E. (2012). Coarseness in U.S. public communication. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiGangi, C. (2014) Debt collectors harass debt-free woman for years. Yahoo! Finance. “http://finance.yahoo.com/news/debt-collectors-harass-debt-free-120000528.html.”.

  • Edy, J. A., & Meirick, P. C. (2007). Wanted, dead or alive: Media frames, frame adoption, and support for the war in Afghanistan. Journal of Communication, 57, 119–141. (Reprinted in Media Power in Politics, 6th ed., D. Graber (Ed.), Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R. M. (2010). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. In D. McQuail (Ed.), McQuail’s reader in mass communication theory (pp. 390–397). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewen, S. (1996). PR!: A social history of spin. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, B., Keefer, B., & Nyhan, B. (2004). All the president’s spin: George W. Bush, the media and the truth. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G. (2002). Against the mainstream: The selected works of George Gerbner. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., & Mowlana, H. (1996). Invisible crises: What conglomerate control of media means for America and the world. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grensing-Pophal, L. (2014). Consumers coming to accept native advertising done right. Econtentmag.com, 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. (1963). Culture against man. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (2006). A propaganda model. In M. G. Durham & D. M. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: Keyworks (pp. 257–294). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. F., & Mazur, L. A. (1995). Marketing madness: A survival guide for a consumer society. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, A. (2014). Ad paints President Obama an awful lot like an abusive boyfriend. Yahoo! News. http://news.yahoo.com/ad-paints-president-obama-awful-lot-abusive-boyfriend-130958144.html.

  • Keen, S. (1986). Faces of the enemy: Reflections of the hostile imagination. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, T. (2007). Disagreement, dogmatism, and belief polarization. The Journal of Philosophy, 105(10), 611–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, E. M. (1997). Modern/postmodern: Off the beaten path of antimodernism. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, E. M. (2013). Dimensional accrual and dissociation: An introduction. In J. Grace & E. M. Kramer (Eds.), Communication, comparative cultures, and civilizations (Vol. 3, pp. 123–184). New York: Hampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinski, J. (Ed.). (2009). Thinking about political psychology. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiss, W., Kline, S., Jhally, S., & Botterill, J. (2005). Social communication in advertising: Consumption in the mediated marketplace (3rd edn.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levendusky, M. (2013). How partisan media polarize America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, J. (2010). Foundations and limits of freedom of the press. In D. McQuail (Ed.), McQuail’s reader in mass communication theory (pp. 172–182). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M., & Taber, C. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, S., & De Fleur, M. L. (1983). The people’s choice: The media in a political campaign. In Milestones in mass communication research: Media effects (pp. 85–112). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. (2014). Yes, Obama’s White House is more secretive than Bush’s. The Week. http://theweek.com/article/index/264536/yes-obamas-white-house-is-more-secretive-than-bushs.

  • McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R. W. (2013). Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the Internet against democracy. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, M., & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Psychology of agenda-setting effects. Mapping the paths of information processing. Review of Communication Research, 2(1), 68–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, M. C. (1999). The “Ideograph”: A link between rhetoric and ideology. In J. L. Lucaites, C. M. Condit, & S. Caudill (Eds.), Contemporary rhetorical theory: A reader (pp. 425–440). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuial, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meirick, P. C., Nisbett, G. S., Jefferson, M. D., & Pfau, M. W. (2011). The influence of tone, target, and issue ownership on political advertising effects in primary versus general elections. Journal of Political Marketing, 10, 275–296. http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/09/22/3570132/religious-conservatives-finally-admit-what-they-really-want-out-of-hobby-lobby/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, C. (2012). The Republican brain: The science of why they deny science and reality. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E., & Schram, R. (2014). What is it worth? The value chasm between brand and influencers. Journal of Brand Strategy, 3(1), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, K. (2014). Obama’s LGBT executive order threatens religious liberty, say advocates. Yahoo! News. http://news.yahoo.com/obama-lgbt-executive-order-threatens-religious-liberty-advocates-201628842.html.

  • Pope, D. (1983). The making of modern advertising. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruane, J. (2014). Public records—now online. Instant Checkmate. http://www.instantcheckmate.com/pr?src=YAHOO&mdm=DISPLAY&cmp=YAHOO&cnt=ECIG&affid=107&campid=314&sid=YAHOO&s1=ECIG&lp=pr&no_pop=true.

  • Schmitt, K. M., Gunther, A. C., & Liebhart, J. L. (2004). Why partisans see mass media as biased. Communication Research, 31, 623–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivulka, J. (2012). Soap, sex, and cigarettes: A cultural history of American advertising (2nd ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smythe, D. W. (2006). On the audience commodity and its work. In M. G. Durham & D. M. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: Keyworks (pp. 230–256). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stableford, D. (2014). Read Hillary Clinton’s 1971 letter to Saul Alinsky. Yahoo! News. http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-saul-alinsky-letters-155526953.html.

  • Tuchman, G. (2010). Making news: Time and typifications. In D. McQuail (Ed.), McQuail’s reader in mass communication theory (pp. 260–269). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (2014). Going native. Creative Review, 34, 12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher M. Bingham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bingham, C., Kramer, E. (2016). Neoliberalism and the Production of Enemies: The Commercial Logic of Yahoo! News . In: Berdayes, V., Murphy, J. (eds) Neoliberalism, Economic Radicalism, and the Normalization of Violence. International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25169-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25169-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25167-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25169-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics