Advertisement

A Living Lab for Optimising the Health, Socio-economic and Environmental Situation in El Salvador

  • Melanie Platz
  • Marlien Herselman
  • Jörg Rapp
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

In order to address chronic renal failure as a critical health problem in El Salvador (Central America) a Living Lab (LL) methodology was applied to assist El Salvador to carry out research on low-cost techniques to mitigate exposure to pesticides and other chemicals in the environment, to improve the production processes and to improve the care of kidney patients in rural areas. This paper discusses and outlines the elements of LLs, and how these were applied to establish a LL in El Salvador to assist with creating risk awareness for risk mitigation to optimise the socio-economic, environmental and health situation in that country. The methodology applied in this paper is a qualitative approach with interpretation as theoretical underpinning and case study as the strategy.

A successful LL context incorporates a clear focus/vision, strong leadership, self-sustainability, a strong sense of community-own challenges and the potential for sustainable community development. The multi-stakeholder inter-disciplinary partnerships on which LLs are based can provide the necessary foundation for addressing some of these challenges, but only when communities are fully engaged. This can allow for co-creation with all stakeholders and to drive innovation as it is from this perspective that LLs can support open innovation in any situation. The newly established LL in El Salvador will support collaborations and innovation between communities, industry, academia and government entities. In the present paper, the elements of LLs, and how these have played a role in the establishment of a LL in El Salvador to assist with creating risk awareness for risk mitigation to optimise the socio-economic, the health situation and the environmental situation will be outlined and discussed based on experiences with LLs in Southern Africa.

Keywords

Chronic Kidney Disease Capacity Building Open Innovation Risk Mitigation Interpretive Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research who supported the project LLinES, the collaboration and thus the establishment of the LL in El Salvador by a grant. The data presented, the statements made and the views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. Furthermore, the work of the project members of the project LLinES was vital for the success of the establishment of the LL. Additionally, we want to thank the National Institute of Health of El Salvador and the University of El Salvador and particularly Rafael Gomez Escoto (University of El Salvador) and Alexandre Ribó (INS-MINSAL) for their support, especially during our visit in El Salvador.

References

  1. AT6FUI (2013) AT6FUI improving public health by application of space technology. http://at6fui.weebly.com/. Accessed 15 June 2015
  2. Carr W, Kemmis S (1986) Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. Falmer Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Chesbrough H (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  4. Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  5. Cunningham P, Herselman M, Cunningham M (2011) Supporting the evolution of sustainable Living Labs and Living Labs networks in Africa. http://www.ist-africa.org/home/files/Supporting_the_Evolution_of_Sustainable_Living_Labs_and_Living_Labs_Networks_in_Africa.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2015
  6. Cunningham P, Cunningham M, Herselman ME (2012) Socio-economic impact of growing Living Labs and Living Lab networks into Africa. In: Proceedings of the IST-Africa 2012 Conference, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 9–11 May 2012Google Scholar
  7. EnoLL (2014) Open Living Labs by ENOLL. http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/. Accessed 15 June 2015
  8. Fahy C, Ponce De Leon M, Ståhlbröst A, Schaffers H, Hongisto P (2007) Services of living labs and their networks. In: Cunningham P, Cunningham M (eds) Expanding the knowledge economy: issues, applications, case studies. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 713–721Google Scholar
  9. Følstad A (2008) Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review. Electron J Virtual Organ Netw 10:99–131Google Scholar
  10. Garcia Guzman J, Navarro de la Cruz M, Schaffers H, Kulkki S (2007) Methodological framework for human and user centric rural living labs. In: Cunningham P, Cunningham M (eds) Expanding the knowledge economy: issues, applications, case studies. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 730–737Google Scholar
  11. Geerts GL (2011) A design science research methodology and its application to accounting information systems research. Int J Account Inf Syst 12(2):142–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herselman ME (2011) Living Labs in Southern Africa network. Paper presented at the 3rd annual LLiSA workshop, Rhodes University, GrahamstownGoogle Scholar
  13. Herselman ME, Marais MA, Pitse-Boshomane MM, Roux K (2009) Establishing a living lab network in Southern Africa. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international IDIA development informatics conference, Kruger National Park, South Africa, 28–30 Oct 2009Google Scholar
  14. Herselman ME, Marias MA, Pitse-Boshomane MM (2010) Applying Living Lab methodology to enhance skills in innovation. In: Proceedings of the eSkills summit 2010, Cape Town, 26–28 July 2010Google Scholar
  15. Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P (2010) The practice of qualitative research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. Manag Inf Syst Q 23(1):67–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lievens B, Van den Broeck W, Pierson J (2006) The mobile digital newspaper: embedding the news consumer in technology development by means of living lab research. Paper presented at annual international association for media and communication research conference, Cairo, Egypt, 23–28 July 2006Google Scholar
  18. LLinES (2014) Living Lab en El Salvador. http://llines.weebly.com/the-project.html. Accessed 15 June 2015
  19. LLiSA (2014) Living Labs in Southern Africa. http://llisa.meraka.org.za/index.php/Living_Labs_in_Southern_Africa. Accessed 15 June 2015
  20. MacEachren AM, Cai G, McNeese M, Sharma R, Fuhrmann S (2006) GeoCollaborative crisis management: designing technologies to meet real-world needs. In: Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on digital government research, San Diego, CA, 21–24 May 2006Google Scholar
  21. MINSAL (2014) Informe de Labores 2013–2014. http://www.salud.gob.sv. Accessed 15 June 2015
  22. Mulder I, Fahy C, Hribernik K, Velthausz D, Feurstein K, Garcia M, Schaffers H, Mirijamdotter A, Ståhlbröst A (2007) Towards harmonized methods and tools for living labs. In: Cunningham P, Cunningham M (eds) Expanding the knowledge economy: issues, applications, case studies. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 722–729Google Scholar
  23. Niehaus (2013) Definition: open community (OC). http://at6fui.weebly.com/open-community-approach.html. Accessed 15 June 2015
  24. One Health Global Network (2015) What is one health? http://www.onehealthglobal.net/what-is-one-health/. Accessed 15 June 2015
  25. Orantes CM, Herrera R, Almaguer M, Brizuela EG, Núñez L, Alvarado NP, Fuentes EJ, Bayarre HD, Amaya JC, Calero DJ, Vela XF, Zelaya SM, Granados DV, Orellana P (2014) Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in adults of Salvadoran agricultural communities. MEDICC Rev 16(2):23–30Google Scholar
  26. Santoro R, Conte M (2009) Living Labs in open innovation functional regions. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on concurrent enterprising ICE 2009, Leiden, Netherlands, 22–24 June 2009Google Scholar
  27. Smit D, Herselman M, Eloff JHP, Ngassam E, Venter E, Ntawanga F, Chuang J, Van Greunen D (2011) Formalising living labs to achieve organisational objectives in emerging economies. In: Proceedings of the IST-Africa 2011 conference, Gaborone, Botswana, 11–13 May 2011Google Scholar
  28. Walsham G (2006) Interpreting information systems in organizations. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Koblenz-LandauLandauGermany
  2. 2.University of South Africa & CSIRPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations