Skip to main content

Democracy in Complex Networks: Political Leaders and Administrative Professionals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Educational Governance Research ((EGTU,volume 2))

Abstract

The core assumption in this chapter is that political actors and civil servants on the municipal level share in the common societal responsibility for the education and upbringing of the next generation. Using a filter of five core public-governance logics in the analysis of our data – the marketplace logic, the managerial, the public, the professional and the ethical –we find both similarities and differences between politicians and civil servants. We analyse how politicians and administrators are positioned in the system and how they develop their commitment to, and their competencies to take part in furthering, both a democratic education and an efficient and effective governance system, in the context of municipalities that face continued restructuring. We present similarities and differences between countries in the project, so some overlapping from the country reports will occur in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    e.g.: WTO: World trade Organisation, OECD: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, GATT: General Agreement on Tariff and Trade, IMF: International Monetary Fund, EU: European Union (especially ‘the Inner Market’) and the World Bank.

  2. 2.

    e.g.: WTO: World trade Organisation, OECD: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, GATT: General Agreement on Tariff and Trade, IMF: International Monetary Fund, EU: European Union (especially ‘the Inner Market’) and the World Bank.

  3. 3.

    See: https://www.regjeringen.no/nb/tema/kommuner-og-regioner/kommunereform/Hvorfor-kommunereform/id752904/

  4. 4.

    Labeled ‘Th Local Government Proposition 2015’—Proposition No. 95.S, downloaded from: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/08781af7a94a495486bfcce05bcb0444/meldingsdel_kommunereform_og_vedlegg.pdf

  5. 5.

    Source: http://www.utdanningsforbundet.no/upload/Publikasjoner/Faktaark/Faktaark%202014/Faktaark_2014.01.pdf

References

  • Beane, J. A., & Apple, M. W. (1999). The case for democratic schools. In M. W. Apple & J. A. Beane (Eds.), Democratic schools, lessons from chalk face. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research and critique. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2003). Demokrati – ett problem för utbildning eller ett uttbildningsproblem? [Democracy – a problem for education or an educational problem?]. Utbildning & Democracy, 12(1), 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovbjerg, K. M., Krause-Jensen, J., Wright, S., Brorholt, G., & Moos, L. (2011). Nye ledelsesrationaler i offentlige organisationer [New leadership-rationals in public organisations]. In K. M. Bovbjerg (Ed.), Motivation og mismod i det moderne arbejdsliv [Commitment and dejection in contemporary work life]. Copenhagen: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, H., & Klausen, K. K. (2012). Den danske kommunekonstruktion [The Danish municipal construction]. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., & Leithwood, K. (Eds.). (2007). Successful principal leadership in times of change. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubnick, M. J. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance. Public Performance and Management Review, 28(3), 376–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englund, T. (2006). Deliberative communication: A pragmatis proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(5), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finances, M. o. (1996). Budget 96 Account, Attachment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W. A., & Shipps, D. (2005). How do leaders interpret conflicting accountabilities to improve student learning? In W. A. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 81–100). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsey, M. (2004). Equity versus excellence: responses to neoliberal ideals in a government high school. Anthropological Forum, 14(3), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. L. D. P. Rainbow (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentalité. In G. Burcell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Hempel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homme, A. D. (2008). Den kommunale skolen. Det lokale skolefeltet i historisk perspektiv [The municipal school. The local school field analyzed from a historical perspective]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen, Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovik, S., & Stigen, I. M. (2004). Kommunal organisering 2004 [Municipal organization in 2004]. Oslo: NIBR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovik, S., & Stigen, I. M. (2008). Kommunal organisering 2008 [Municipal organization in 2008]. Oslo: NIBR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanervio, P., & Risku, P. (2009). Tutkimus kuntien yleissivistävän koulutuksen opetustoimen johtamisen tilasta ja muutoksista Suomessa [A study on the status and changes of educational leadership in the provision of general education in Finnish municipalities]. Opetusministeriön julkaisuja 2009: 16. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausen, K. K., Michelsen, J., & Nielsen, D. M. (2011). Den decentrale leder [The decentralized leder]. Odense: University of South Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S. (2003). Democratic values and schools. In J. MacBeath & L. Moos (Eds.), Democratic learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lov om folkeskolen, LOV nr 509 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist, L. (1998). Demokratins väktare. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1994). A primer on decision-making: How decisions happen. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, K. B., Christman, D. E., Hernandez, F., Fierro, E., Capper, C. A., Dantley, M., Gonzalez, M. L., Cambron-McCabe, N., & Scheurich, J. J. (2008). From the field: A proposal for educating leaders for social justice. Education Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 111–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montin, S., & Amnå, E. (2000). Towards a new concept of local self-government. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2003). Pædagogisk ledelse – om ledelsesopgaven og relationerne i uddannelsesinstitutioner [Educational leadership – On the leadership task and relations in educational institutions]. Copenhagen: Børsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2006a). Fra politiske demokratidiskurser mod markedsorienterede effektivitetsdiskurser [From political discourses of democracy towards market oriented efficiency discourses]. Nordisk Pedagogik, 26(4), 322–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2006b). Leadership for learning: Reflection on democratic purposes. Leading and Managing, 12(2), 64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2007). Ledelse af undervisning og demokratisk dannelse [Leading education and ‘Democratic Bildung’]. In J. K. Lejf Moos & K. K. Kofod (Eds.), Meninger i ledelse (pp. 137–162). Dafolo: Frederikshavn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2008a). Diskurser og styringslogikker i kampen om demokratisk dannelse [Discourses and governance logics in the struggle for democratic Bildung]. In J. K. L. Moos (Ed.), Klasseledelse – magtkampe i praksis, pædagogik og politik. Dafolo: Frederikshavn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2008b). School leadership for ‘Democratic Bildung’: Fundamentalist beliefs or critical reflection? School Leadership and Management, 28(3), 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2009a). A general context for new social technologies. Nordic Educational Research, 29(1), 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2009b). Hard and soft governance: The journey from transnational agencies to school leadership. European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2010). From successful school leadership towards distributed leadership. In S. G. Huber (Ed.), School leadership – International perspectives (pp. 101–124). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2011). Sustaining leadership through self-renewing communication. In L. Moos, O. Johansson, & C. Day (Eds.), How school principals sustain success over time (pp. 127–150). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2012). Educational leadership in a competitive state: A contradiction in terms? International Journal of Educational Management, 26(5), 461–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L., & Paulsen, J. M. (2014). School boards in the governance process (Vol. 1). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L., Hansen, B., Björk, G., & Johansson, O. (2013). Leadership for democracy. In L. Moos (Ed.), Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership – is there a Nordic model? Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nihlfors, E. (2003). Scholchefen i skolans styrning og ledning [The superintendent in governance and leadership of the school] (Uppsala Studies in Education, 102). Uppsala: Uppsala University, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1995). Governance in transition. Public management reforms in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Journal C 318. (2008/C 319). Conclusions of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 21 November 2008 on preparing young people for the 21st century: An agenda for European cooperation on schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (1988). Statsstyre og institusjonsutforming [State governing and institution building]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, J. M., Olof, J., Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., & Risku, M. (2014). Superintendent leadership under shifting governance regimes. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 812–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, D. (2005). Ledelsesrummet i managementstaten [The leadership space in the management state]. In D. Pedersen (Ed.), Offentlig ledelse i managementstaten [Public leadership in the management state]. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, T. H. (2009). Fra kommunale forvaltninger til ‘forvaltningsløse’ kommuner [From municipal civil services to ‘civil service-less’ municipalities’]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tromsø, Tromsø.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, O. K. (2011). Konkurrencestaten [The competitive state]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., Marshall, J., & Fitzsimons, P. (2000). Managerialism and educational policy in a global context: Foucault, neoliberalism and the doctrine of self-management. In N. C. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 109–132). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. S., & Wehlage, G. G. (1973). Accountability: Critique and alternative perspective. Interchange, 4(4), 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinne, R., Kivirauma, J., & Simola, H. (2002). Shoots of revisionist education policy or just slow readjustment? The Finnish case of educational reconstruction. Journal of Education Policy, 17(6), 643–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røvik, K. A. (2007). Trender og translasjoner. Ideer som former det 21. århundrets organisasjon [Trends and translations. Ideas that form the organization of the 21st century]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. In C. B. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryynänen, A. (2004). Kuntien ja alueiden itsehallinto – kehittämisvaihtoehdot [Municipal and regional self-government – development options]. Helsinki: Edita Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations. Ideas, interests, and identities. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E. (2003). Netværksstyring [Network governence]. In B. Jæger & E. Sørensen (Eds.), Roller der rykker [Changing roles]. Copenhagen: Jurist og Økonomforbundets Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanek, H. (2011). Choktal: Rekord i skolenedlægelser [Chock: record in school closures]. Folkeskolen. Retrieved from website: http://www.folkeskolen.dk/ObjectShow.aspx?Objectd=66984

  • Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (2000a). The tyranny of transparency. British Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000b). Audit cultures. Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svedberg, L. (2000). Rektorsrollen [The school leadership role]. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranøy, B. S., & Østerud, Ø. (2001). En fragmentert stat? [A fragmented state?]. In B. S. Tranøy & Ø. Østerud (Eds.), Den fragmenterte staten: Reformer, makt og styring [The fragmented state. Reforms, power and governing]. Oslo: Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. E. (1999). Democratic theory and trust. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society. New York: Bedminster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lejf Moos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moos, L., Johansson, O., Paulsen, J.M., Strand, M., Risku, M. (2016). Democracy in Complex Networks: Political Leaders and Administrative Professionals. In: Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., Paulsen, J. (eds) Nordic Superintendents: Agents in a Broken Chain. Educational Governance Research, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25104-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25106-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics