Abstract
School superintendents are at the heart of the governance of municipal education, whether this is seen as a chain or networks of governance. Because educational governance and structures in the Nordic countries are currently undergoing much restructuring and reconceptualisation at the hands of national governments influenced by transnational agencies, the research project presented here investigates the functions and relations of school superintendents in four Nordic countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. In our presentations of the project’s surveys of superintendents, school boards and school leaders, we use a number of overarching theories – theories of comparison, of new institutionalism and networks, and of translation, power and social technologies. We investigate our subject from two perspectives. One is the Danish, Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish country reports, written within a shared frame so as to give national images of superintendents; the other is the cross-cutting, thematic Nordic and international investigations and discussions. We begin this opening chapter with an account of our starting point, our interests and our methods, and an introduction to the theories examined; we end it with a discussion of our work in a comparative perspective and a further discussion of some of the themes chosen for the thematic chapters.
This is Volume 2 of the Springer book series on Educational Governance Research from our research project on School Superintendents. The first volume is: Moos, L. and Paulsen, J.M. (Eds.)(2014) School Boards in the Governance Process. Dordrecht: Springer
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antunes, F. (2006). Globalisation and Europeification of Educatgion Policies: Routes, processes and metamorphoses. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 38–55.
Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (Eds.). (2013). The Nordic education model: ‘A School for All’ encounters neo-liberal policy. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brass, D. J., Calaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817.
Brunsson, N. (1998). A world of standards: Standardization as a societal form (2nd ed.). Stockholm: Stockholm Center for Organizational Research.
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
Foucault, M. (1976/1994). Viljen til viden. Seksualitetens historie 1 [The will to knowledge. The history of sexuality 1]. København: Det Lille Forlag.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentalité. In G. Burcell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Hempel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Gioia, D. A., & Poole, P. P. (1984). Scripts in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 49–459.
Glass, T., Bjork, L., & Brunner, C. (2000). The study of the American School Superintendency: A look at the superintendent of education in the new millennium. Arlington: American Association of School Administrators.
Gould, R. V., & Fernandez, R. M. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology, 19, 89–126.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Gutmann, A. (1987/1999). Democratic education with a new preface and epilogue. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(Spring), 3–19.
Imsen, G., Blossing, U., & Moos, L. (Forthcoming). Reshaping the Nordic Education Model in an era of efficiency. European Educational Research.
Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In P. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lawn, M., & Lingard, B. (2002). Constructing a European Policy Space in Educational Governance: The role of transnational policy actors. European Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 290–307.
Leithwood, K. A., & Riehl, C. (2003). What do we already know about successful school leadership? Toronto: OISE.
Lundquist, L. (1998) Demokratins väktare [The guardians of democracy]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Meyer, H.-D., & Rowan, V. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
Moos, L. (2008). School leadership for ‘Democratic Bildung’: Fundamentalist beliefs or critical reflection? School Leadership and Management, 28(3), 229–246.
Moos, L. (2009a). A general context for new social technologies. Nordic Educational Research, 29(1), 79–92.
Moos, L. (2009b). Hard and Soft Governance: The journey from transnational agencies to school leadership. European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 397–406.
Moos, L. (2013a). Comparing educational leadership research. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(3), 282–299.
Moos, L. (2013b). Postlude: Wrap up of the argument. In L. Moos (Ed.), Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership – Is there a Nordic model? Dordrecht: Springer.
Moos, L. (2013c). Prelude: Tuning the instrument. In L. Moos (Ed.), Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership – is there a Nordic model? Dordrecht: Springer.
Moos, L. (Ed.). (2013d). Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership – is there a Nordic model? Dordrecht: Springer.
Moos, L., & Paulsen, J. M. (2014). Comparing educational governance. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School boards in the governance process. Dordrecht: Springer.
Newell, S., Tansley, C., & Huang, J. (2004). Social capital and knowledge integration in an ERP project team: The importance of bridging AND bonding. British Journal of Management, 15, 43–57.
OECD. (1995). Governance in transition. Public management reforms in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2008). Education at a glance. Paris: OECD.
Paulsen, J. M., Johansson, O., Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., & Risku, M. (2014). Superintendent leadership under shifting governance regimes. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 812–822.
Pedersen, D. (2005). Ledelsesrummet i managementstaten [The leadership space in the management state]. In D. Pedersen (Ed.), Offentlig ledelse i managementstaten [Public leadership in the management state]. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Pedersen, O. K. (2011). Konkurrencestaten [The competitive state]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Rowan, B. (2006). The new institutionalism and the study of educational organizations: Changing ideas for changing times. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Røvik, K. A. (2011). From fashion to virus: An alternative theory of organizations’ handling of management ideas. Organization Studies, 32(5), 631–653.
Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Engwall, L. (2002). Carriers, flows, and sources of management knowledge. In K. Sahlin-Andersson & L. Engwall (Eds.), The expansion of management knowledge. Carriers, flows and sources (pp. 3–33). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 2008(11), 303–326.
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Scott, R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Los Angeles: Sage.
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations. Ideas, interests, and identities. Los Angeles: Sage.
Spillane, J., & Burch, P. (2006). The institutional environment and instructional practice: Changing patterns of guidance and control in public education. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2010). The politics and economics of comparison. Comparative Education Review, 54(3), 323–342.
Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Netværksstyring – fra government til governance [Governing i networks – From government to governance]. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousands Oaks: Sage.
Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Wilkoszewski, H., & Sundby, E. (2014). Steering from the centre: New modes of governance in multi-level education systems (Vol. OECD Education Working Papers No. 109). Paris: OECD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., Paulsen, J.M. (2016). Directions for Our Investigation of the Chain of Governance and the Agents. In: Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., Paulsen, J. (eds) Nordic Superintendents: Agents in a Broken Chain. Educational Governance Research, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25104-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25106-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)