Advertisement

Alternatives to Nissen Fundoplication: The Hill Repair and the Nissen-Hill Hybrid

  • Heather Warren
  • Ralph W. AyeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Since its introduction in 1967, the Hill repair has proven to be an effective and durable surgical intervention for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In addition to the standard tenets of antireflux surgery, it incorporates three key anatomic concepts: the intra-abdominal posterior fixation of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), the pivotal role of the lower esophageal sphincter collar sling musculature in the proper reconstruction of the GEJ, and the importance of the gastroesophageal valve for the competence of the antireflux barrier. It has undergone two major modifications since its inception including conversion from an open to a laparoscopic procedure, and incorporation into a new operation to include a Nissen fundoplication wrap as part of the Nissen-Hill hybrid procedure. The original Hill procedure, as well as its variants, demonstrated excellent long-term outcomes in the surgical management of uncomplicated and complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease as well as paraesophageal hernias. We will discuss the history, principles, techniques, and results of the Hill Repair and Nissen-Hill hybrid antireflux operations.

Keywords

Antireflux surgery Gastroesophageal reflux disease Hill repair Nissen-Hill hybrid Manometry Lower esophageal sphincter Gastroesophageal valve Gastroesophageal junction 

References

  1. 1.
    Hill LD. An effective operation for hiatal hernia: an eight year appraisal. Ann Surg. 1967;166(4):681–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aye RW, et al. The Hill antireflux repair at 5 institutions over 25 years. Am J Surg. 2011;201(5):599–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aye RW, et al. A randomized multi institution comparison of the laparoscopic Nissen and Hill repairs. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(3):951–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Low DE, et al. Fifteen- to twenty-year results after the Hill antireflux operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;98(3):444–9. discussion 449–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aye R. The Hill procedure for gastroesophageal reflux [AU1]. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Harcourt Health Sciences; 2001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aye R, Gupta A. Antireflux surgery: the Hill antireflux operations repair and its variants. New York: Springer; 2014.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jobe BA, et al. Laparoscopic management of giant type III hiatal hernia and short esophagus. Objective follow-up at three years. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6(2):181–8. discussion 188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aye RW, Mazza DE, Hill LD. Laparoscopic Hill repair in patients with abnormal motility. Am J Surg. 1997;173(5):379–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Korn O, et al. Gastroesophageal sphincter: a model. Dis Esophagus. 1997;10(2):105–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schneider A, Aye R. Impact of intraoperative manometry on the Hill repair. Abstract presented at North Pacific Surgical Association, 14–15 Nov 2014. 2014.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Demeester TR, Johnson LF, Kent AH. Evaluation of current operations for the prevention of gastroesophageal reflux. Ann Surg. 1974;180(4):511–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pennathur A, et al. Minimally invasive redo antireflux surgery: lessons learned. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(6):S2174–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horgan S, et al. Failed antireflux surgery: what have we learned from reoperations? Arch Surg. 1999;134(8):809–15. discussion 815–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Albertucci M. Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 1986;204(1):9–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Attwood SE, et al. Standardization of surgical technique in antireflux surgery: the LOTUS trial experience. World J Surg. 2008;32(6):995–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qureshi AP, et al. The laparoscopic Nissen-Hill hybrid: pilot study or a combined antireflux procedure. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(6):1945–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aye RW, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen-Hill hybrid: a promising solution for Type III paraesophageal hernia. Abstract Poster presentation at Digestive Disease Week, 20 May, 2013. 2013.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schneider AM et al. Does the Nissen-Hill hybrid repair reduce recurrence rates for uncomplicated GERD? Abstract Poster presentation at Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons 16–17 Apr 2015. 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Thoracic SurgerySwedish Medical CenterSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Thoracic and Foregut SurgerySwedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical CenterSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations