Abstract
In this chapter, the different basic assumptions for the development of assignment models to transit networks (frequency-based, schedule-based) are presented together with the possible approaches to the simulation of the dynamic system (steady state, macroscopic flows, agent-based).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alfa AS, Chen MY (1995) Temporal distribution of public transport demand during the peak period. Eur J Oper Res 83:137–153
Amin-Naseri MR, Baradaran V (2014) Accurate estimation of average waiting time in public transportation systems. Transp Sci 49:213–222
Andreasson I. (1976) A method for the analysis of transit networks. In: Roubens M (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd European congress on operations research, North Holland, Amsterdam
Balmer M, Rieser M, Meister K, Charypar D, Lefebvre N, Nagel K (2008) MATSim-T: architecture and simulation times. In: Bazzan ALC, KlĂ¼gl F (ed) Multi-agent systems for traffic and transportation engineering. Information science reference, Hershey, pp 57–78
Bellei G, Gentile G, Papola N (2005) A within-day dynamic traffic assignment model for urban road networks. Transp Res B 39:1–29
Bellei G, Gentile G, Meschini L, Papola N (2006) A demand model with departure time choice for within-day dynamic traffic assignment. Eur J Oper Res 175:1557–1576
Bellman R (1958) On a routing problem. Q Appl Math 16:87–90
Bowman LA, Turnquist MA (1981) Service frequency, schedule reliability and passenger wait times at transit stops. Transportation Research A 15:465–471
Cantarella GE (1997) A general fixed-point approach to multimode multi-user equilibrium assignment with elastic demand. Transp Sci 31:107–128
Cantarella GE, Cascetta E (1995) Dynamic processes and equilibrium in transportation networks: towards a unifying theory. Transp Sci 29:305–329
Cats O (2013) Multi-agent transit operations and assignment model. Proc Comput Sci 19:809–814
Cats O, Burghout W, Toledo T, Kousopoulos HN (2010) Mesoscopic modeling of bus public transportation. Transp Res Rec 2188:9–18
Cats O, Kousopoulos HN, Burghout W, Toledo T (2011) Effect of real-time transit information on dynamic path choice of passengers. Transp Res Rec 2217:46–54
Chriqui C, Robillard P (1975) Common bus lines. Transp Sci 9:115–121
De Cea J, Fernandez JE (1989) Transit assignment to minimal routes: an efficient new algorithm. Traffic Eng Control 30:491–494
Dial RB (1967) Transit pathfinder algorithm. Highw Res Board 205:67–85
Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer Math 1:269–271
Ettema D, Jong K, Timmermans H, Bakema A (2007) PUMA: multi-agent modelling of urban systems. In: Koomen E et al (eds) Modelling land-use change, pp 237–258
Fearnside K, Draper DP (1971) Public transport assignment—a new approach. Traffic Eng Control 13:298–299
Friedrich M, Hofsaess I, Wekeck S (2001) Timetable-based transit assignment using branch and bound techniques. Transp Res Rec 1752:100–107
Gallo G, Longo G, Nguyen S, Pallottino S (1993) Directed hypergraphs and applications. Discrete Appl Math 42:177–201
Gao W, Balmer M, Miller EJ (2010) Comparisons between MATSim and EMME/2 on the greater Toronto and Hamilton area network. Transp Res Rec 2197:118–128
Gentile G (2010) The general link transmission model for dynamic network loading and a comparison with the due algorithm. In: Immers LGH, Tampere CMJ, Viti F (eds) New developments in transport planning: advances in Dynamic Traffic Assignment (selected papers from the DTA 2008 conference, Leuven). Transport economics, management and policy series. Edward Elgar Publishing, MA, pp 153–178
Gentile G (2015) Using the general link transmission model in a dynamic traffic assignment to simulate congestion on urban networks. Transp Res Proc 5:66–81
Gentile G, Papola A (2006) An alternative approach to route choice simulation: the sequential models. In: Proceedings of the European transport conference, Strasbourg, France
Gentile G, Meschini L, Papola N (2005) Spillback congestion in dynamic traffic assignment: a macroscopic flow model with time-varying bottlenecks. Transp Res B 41:1114–1138
Hickman MD, Bernstein DH (1997) Transit service and path choice models in stochastic and time-dependent networks. Transp Sci 31:129–146
Jolliffe JK, Hutchinson TP (1975) A behavioral explanation of the association between bus and passenger arrivals at a bus stop. Transp Sci 9:248–282
Larson RC, Odoni AR (1981) Urban operations research. Prentice-Hall, Englewoods Cliffs
Last A, Leak SE (1976) Transept: a bus model. Traffic Eng Control 17:14–20
Le Clercq F (1972) A public transport assignment method. Traffic Eng Control 14:91–96
Meignan D, Simonin O, Koukam A (2007) Simulation and evaluation of urban bus-networks using a multiagent approach. Simul Model Pract Theory 15:659–671
Meschini L, Gentile G, Papola N (2007) A frequency based transit model for dynamic traffic assignment to multimodal networks. In: Allsop R, Bell MGH, Heydecker BG (eds) Proceedings of the 17th international symposium on transportation and traffic theory (ISTTT). Elsevier, London, pp 407–436
Moller-Pedersen J (1999) Assignment model of timetable based systems (TPSCHEDULE). In: Proceedings of 27th European transportation forum, seminar F, Cambridge, England, pp 159–168
Nguyen S, Pallottino S, Malucelli F (2001) A modeling framework for passenger assignment on a transport network with timetables. Transp Sci 35:238–249
Nielsen OA (2000) A stochastic transit assignment model considering differences in passengers utility functions. Transp Res B 34:377–402
Nielsen OA (2004) A large-scale stochastic multi-class schedule-based transit model with random coefficients. In: Wilson NHM, Nuzzolo A (eds) Schedule-based dynamic transit modeling: theory and applications. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, pp 53–78
Nielsen OA, Jovicic G (1999) A large-scale stochastic timetable-based transit assignment model for route and sub-mode choices. Transp Plann Methods 434:169–184
Nuzzolo A, Russo F (1998) A dynamic network loading model for transit services. In: Proceedings of TRAISTAN III, San Juan, Puerto Rico
Nuzzolo A, Russo F, Crisalli U (2001) A doubly dynamic schedule-based assignment model for transit networks. Transp Sci 35:268–285
Osuna E, Newell G (1972) Control strategies for an idealized public transportation system. Transp Sci 6:52–72
Pallottino S, Scutellà MG (1998) Shortest path algorithms in transportation models: classical and innovative aspects. In: Marcotte P, Nguyen S (eds) Equilibrium and advanced transportation modelling. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 245–281
Salvini P, Miller EJ (2005) ILUTE: an operational prototype of a comprehensive microsimulation model of urban systems. Netw Spat Econ 5:217–234
Sheffi Y (1984) Urban transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Prentice-Hall, NJ
Sumi T, Matsumoto Y, Miyaki Y (1990) Departure time and route choice of commuters on mass transit systems. Transp Res B 24:247–262
Toledo T, Cats O, Burghout W, Koutsopoulos HN (2010) Mesoscopic simulation for transit operations. Transp Res C 18:896–908
Tong CO, Wong SC (1999) A stochastic transit assignment model using a dynamic schedule-based network. Transp Res B 33:107–121
TRB (2013) TCRP Report 165–Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 3rd Edition
Wahba M, Shalaby A (2005) Multiagent learning-based approach to transit assignment problem a prototype. Transp Res Rec 1926:96–105
Wang J, Wahba M, Miller EJ (2010) A comparison of an agent-based transit assignment procedure (MILATRAS) with conventional approaches city of Toronto transit network. In: Proceedings of the 89th transportation research board annual meeting, Washington DC
Watling D (1999) Stability of the stochastic equilibrium assignment problem: a dynamical systems approach. Transp Res B 33:281–312
Yperman I (2007) The link transmission model for dynamic network loading. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gentile, G., Florian, M., Hamdouch, Y., Cats, O., Nuzzolo, A. (2016). The Theory of Transit Assignment: Basic Modelling Frameworks. In: Gentile, G., Noekel, K. (eds) Modelling Public Transport Passenger Flows in the Era of Intelligent Transport Systems. Springer Tracts on Transportation and Traffic. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25082-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25082-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25080-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25082-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)