Skip to main content

Addressing Water Conflicts Through Context-Specific Institutional Analysis: A Handbook for Research Projects and Programmes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrated Water Resources Management: Concept, Research and Implementation

Abstract

An approach is presented to address adequately the prevailing political and institutional constraints and opportunities of IWRM projects across different domains. The proposed means to achieve this is presented in ‘The IRS Handbook’ which provides an inductive, ‘bottom-up’ analytical framework and a methodological guide for utilisation plus an appendix of useful resources. The overall objective is to facilitate the embedding of these projects within specific socio-political contexts, rather than alongside or in conflict with existing institutional structures and practices. The IRS Handbook has four key elements. First, a four-stage analytical approach is presented (‘Water Storylines’, ‘Domains of Problems/Solutions’, ‘Political and Institutional Feasibility’ and ‘Ways Forward’). Second, it is two-speed in design: a Fast-track version has been designed to fit with planning or pilot stages of projects. The In-depth version is intended to be used in the main phase of a R+D project. Third, it is modular in form: in each stage key approaches in the literature are detailed and linked into the overall framework in a modular fashion with suggestions as to how research could be extended or supplemented in important areas. Fourth, the framework encourages iterative research, so that the researcher regularly tests and updates findings in what will normally be a changing institutional and political context. Overall, the IRS Handbook provides orientation for the best ways forward for most feasible solutions and an assessment of how less compatible solutions could be supported, including ways of adapting existing institutional arrangements.

The chapter summarizes the online document “The IRS Handbook. Analysing institutional and political contexts of water resources management projects” authored by Beveridge et al. (2012a) which is an outcome of the research project “Strengthening Integrated Water Resource Management through institutional analysis: an analytical tool and operative methodology for research projects and programmes (WaRM-In)”, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), 11/2010–07/2012. The cited online document is also available in German (Beveridge et al. 2012b).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bandaragoda DJ (2000) A framework for institutional analysis for water resources management in a river basin context, Working Paper 5. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge R, Monsees J (2012) Bridging parallel discourses of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM): institutional and political challenges in developing and developed countries. Water Int 37(7):727–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge R, Monsees J, Moss T (2012a) The IRS Handbook. Analysing institutional and political contexts of water resources management projects. http://www.irs-net.de/download/publikationen/WarmIn-en.pdf. Accessed 20 Sep 2013

  • Beveridge R, Monsees J, Moss T (2012b) Das IRS Handbuch. Zur Analyse der institutionellen und politischen Kontexte von Projekten zum Wasserressourcen-Management. http://irs-net.de/download/publikationen/WarmIn-de.pdf. Accessed 20 Sep 2013

  • Biswas A (2004) Integrated water resources management: reassessment. Water Int 29(2):248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth J, Warner J, Moriarty P et al (2010) Finding practical approaches to integrated water resources management. Water Altern 3(1):68–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Chéné J-M (2009) Integrated water resources management: theory versus practice. Nat Resour Forum 33(1):2–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver F (2002) Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. Eur J Dev Res 14(2):11–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement F (2010) Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sci 43:129–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conca K (2006) Governing water: contentious transnational politics and global institution building. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore J, Lebel L (2010) Deliberation and scale in mekong region water governance. Environ Manage 46:60–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenhöh E (2007) Designing agent-based models of water management regimes using the IAD framework. In: Ostrom E, Schlüter A (eds) The challenge of self-governance in complex, globalizing economies. Institute of Forest Economy, Freiburg, pp 81–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein B, Throgmorton J (2003) Story and sustainability: planning, practice and possibility for American cities. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer F (2003) Reframing public policy: discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garb Y, Pulver S, VanDeveer SD (2008) Scenarios in society, society in scenarios: toward a social scientific analysis of storyline-driven environmental modeling. Environ Res Lett 3(045015):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Giupponi C (2007) Decision support systems for implementing the european water framework directive: the MULINO approach. Environ Model Softw 22(2):248–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göhler G (1997) Wie verändern sich Institutionen? Revolutionärer und schleichender Institutionenwandel. In: Göhler G (ed) Institutionenwandel. Leviathan Sonderheft, 16/1996. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp 21–56

    Google Scholar 

  • GWP Global Water Partnership (no date) GWP Tool Box. http://www.gwp.org/en/ToolBox/. Accessed 20 Sep 2013

  • Hajer M (1995) The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M (2003) A frame in the fields: policymaking and the reinvention of politics. In: Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative policy analysis. understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 88–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M (2006) Doing discourse analysis: coalitions, practices, meaning. In: van den Brink M, Metze T (eds) Words matter in policy and planning. Discourse theory and method in the social sciences. Netherlands Geographical Studies, Utrecht, pp 65–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth D (2005) Applying discourse theory: the method of articulation. In: Howarth D, Torfing J (eds) Discourse theory in European politics: discourse theory in European politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 316–349

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development (2008) Institutional and organizational analysis for pro-poor change: meeting IFAD’s millennium challenge. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram HM, Mann DE, Weatherford GD et al (1984) Guidelines for improved institutional analysis in water resources planning. Water Resour Res 20(3):323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankford B (2007) Integrated, adaptive and domanial water resources management. Chapter for CAIWA conference, Basel, 12–15 Nov 2007. In: Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Möltgen J (eds) Adaptive and integrated water management. Springer, Berlin, pp 39–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankford B, Merrey D, Cour J et al (2007) From integrated to expedient: an adaptive framework for river basin management in developing countries. IWMI Research Report 110. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel L, Garden P, Imamura M (2005) The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the mekong region. Ecol Soc 10(2):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel L, Daniel R, Badenoch N et al (2008) A multi-level perspective on conserving with communities: experiences from upper tributary watersheds in montane mainland Southeast Asia. Int J Commons 2(1):127–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz R, Scharpf F (eds) (1995) Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Campus, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis MD, Ostrom E (2010) IAD and SES dynamic flows: introducing the program in institutional analysis of social-ecological systems (PIASES) framework. In: Preliminary draft of a paper to be presented at the 13th economics of infrastructures conference, Delft, The Netherlands, 27–28 April 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrey D, Cook S (2012) Fostering institutional creativity at multiple levels: towards facilitated institutional Bricolage. Water Altern 5(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell B (2005) Integrated water resource management, institutional arrangements, and land-use planning. Environ Plann A 37:1335–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molle F (2008) Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: insights from the water sector. Water Altern 1(1):131–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle F, Mollinga PP, Meinzen-Dick R (2008) Water, politics and development: introducing water alternatives. Water Altern 1(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollinga PP (2008) Water, politics and development: framing a political sociology of water resources management. Water Altern 1(1):7–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss T (2003a) Induzierter Institutionenwandel ‘von oben’ und die Anpassungsfähigkeit regionaler Institutionen: Zur Umsetzung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie in Deutschland. In: Moss T (ed) Das Flussgebiet als Handlungsraum. Institutionenwandel durch die EU Wasser-rahmenrichtlinie aus raumwissenschaftlichen Perspektiven. Lit-Verlag, Münster, pp 129–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss T (2003b) Solving problems of ‘Fit’ at the expense of problems of ‘interplay’? the spatial reorganisation of water management following the eu water framework directive. In: Breit H et al (eds) How institutions change: perspectives on social learning in global and local environmental contexts. Leske+Budrich, Opladen, pp 85–121

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1999) Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In: Sabatier P (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview, Boulder, pp 35–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2005) Doing institutional analysis: digging deeper than markets and hierarchies. In: Menard C, Shirley MM (eds) Handbook of new institutional economics. Springer, Münster, pp 819–848

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2011) Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Stud J 39(1):7–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J (1994) Rules, games, and common pool resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Holtz G, Kastens B et al (2010) Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the management and transition framework. Environ Sci Policy 13:571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poirier BA, Loë RC (2010) Analyzing water institutions in the 21st century: guidelines for water researchers and professionals. J Nat Res Policy Res 2(3):229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth W-M (1995) From “Wiggly Structures” to “Unshaky Towers”: problem framing, solution finding, and negotiation of courses of actions during a civil engineering unit for elementary students. Res Sci Educ 25(4):365–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleth MR, Dinar A (2004) The institutional economics of water: a cross-country analysis of institutions and performance. Edward Elgar and World Bank, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saleth MR, Dinar A (2005) Water institutional reforms: theory and practice. Water Policy 7(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Saravanan VS (2008) A systems approach to unravel complex water management institutions. Ecol Complex 5:202–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saravanan VS, McDonald GT, Mollinga PP (2009) Critical review of integrated water resources management: moving beyond polarised discourse. Nat Res Forum 33(1):76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt VA (2010) Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “New Institutionalism“. Eur Polit Sci Rev 2(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slootweg R, Mollinga PP (2009) The impact assessment framework. In: Slootweg R et al (eds) Biodiversity in environmental assessment: enhancing ecosystem services for human well-being. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young O (2002) The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitoun M, Allan JA (2008) Applying hegemony and power theory to transboundary water analysis. Water Policy 10(Supplement 2):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitoun M, Warner J (2006) Hydro-hegemony—a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy 8(5):435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Monsees .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Monsees, J., Beveridge, R., Moss, T. (2016). Addressing Water Conflicts Through Context-Specific Institutional Analysis: A Handbook for Research Projects and Programmes. In: Borchardt, D., Bogardi, J., Ibisch, R. (eds) Integrated Water Resources Management: Concept, Research and Implementation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25071-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics