Skip to main content

Ensuring that Ecological Science Contributes to Natural Resource Management Using a Delphi-Derived Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Modeling with Stakeholders

Abstract

This chapter approaches participatory modeling in environmental decision making from an atypical perspective. It broadly addresses the question of how to assure that science conducted to assist practitioners improves resource management. More specifically, it describes a case involving environmental science and natural resource management at Fort Benning, a United States (US) Army installation in the southeastern US where disparate environmental research projects were funded by a single federal agency to enhance the ability of Fort Benning’s resource managers to achieve their resource management goals. The role of our effort was to integrate the scientific studies in a manner that would be meaningful and useful for resource managers. Hence we assembled a team consisting of an anthropologist, ecologist, microbiologist, statistician, and geographic information systems specialist who developed a common framework that served as the basis for this integration. The team first used a Delphi expert elicitation, which evolved into an approach more akin to facilitated negotiation. This second approach arose organically, particularly when our team took advantage of an opportunity for face-to-face interaction. Although the shift in our approach was unplanned, it proved to be highly productive. We discuss the potential utility of our approach for other situations and suggest that it would be useful to initiate at the beginning of research where the aim is to produce scientific results that meet practitioners’ needs, specifically in the realm of environmental science and resource management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This gap is evident in many contexts. As one example, Sedlacko et al. (2013) assess the use of science by policy makers in the realm of sustainability in their discussion of CORPUS (Enhancing the Connectivity between Research and Policy-Making in Sustainable Consumption) in Europe. As another example, in the medical arena, the science-practice gap falls under the umbrella of “translational research.” In fact, the US National Institutes of Health National created the Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) in 2011 to help assure that the results of medical research aid patients more quickly than has occurred in the past (http://www.ncats.nih.gov/, accessed in December 2014). And a 2005 National Research Council (National Research Council 2005) report makes recommendations to close the gaps between social science research and its use in environmental decision making.

  2. 2.

    Website accessed in November 2014.

References

  • Aber J et al (2000) Applying ecological principles to management of the U.S. national forests. Issues Ecol 6:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bañuls VA, Turoff M (2011) Scenario construction via Delphi and cross-impact analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78(9):1579–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor M, Sampson H, Baker S, Dahlgren K (2013) Useful but no Oracle: reflections on the use of a Delphi Group in a multi-methods policy research study. Qual Res 0(0):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns J, McCormick PV, Niederlehner BR (1993) A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia 236:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government (1992) Enabling the future: linking science and technology to societal goals. A report. Available via http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/PDF/Enabling%20the%20Future%20Linking%20Science%20and%20Technology%20to%20Societal%20Goals.pdf

  • Dale VH, Beyeler SC (2001) Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Indic 1(1):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Beyeler SC, Jackson B (2002) Understory vegetation indicators of anthropogenic disturbance in longleaf pine forests at Fort Benning, Georgia, USA. Ecol Indic 1(3):155–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, VH, Mulholland P, Olsen LM, Feminella J, Maloney K, White DC, Peacock A, Foster T (2004) Selecting a suite of ecological indicators for resource management. In: Kapustka LA, Gilbraith H, Luxon M, Biddinger GR (eds) Landscape ecology and wildlife habitat evaluation: critical information for ecological risk assessment, land-use management activities and biodiversity enhancement practices, ASTM STP 11813. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, pp 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Peacock AD, Garten CT Jr, Sobek E, Wolfe AK (2008) Selecting indicators of soil, microbial, and plant conditions to understand ecological changes in Georgia pine forests. Ecol Indic 8(6):818–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey N, Helmer O (1962) An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci 9(3):458–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilustro JJ et al (2002) Soil texture, land-use intensity, and vegetation of Fort Benning upland forest sites. J Torrey Bot Soc 129(4):289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan LK, Dilustro JJ, Collins BS (2004) Avian response to forest management and military training activities at Ft. Benning, GA. Georgia J Sci 62(2):95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Garten CT Jr, Ashwood TL, Dale VH (2003) Effect of military training on indicators of soil quality at Fort Benning, Georgia. Ecol Indic 3:171–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones S, Fischhoff B, Lach D (1999) Evaluating the usefulness of climate-change research for policy decisions. Clim Chang 43:581–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzysik AJ et al (2005) Development of ecological indicator guilds for land management, final report. Available via: https://www.serdp-estcp.org/Program-Areas/Resource-Conservation-and-Climate-Change/Natural-Resources/Species-Ecology-and-Management/RC-1114

  • Landeta J, Barrutia J, Lertxundi A (2011) Hybrid Delphi: a methodology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78:1629–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linstone HA, Turoff M (eds) (1975) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney KO, Mulholland PJ, Feminella JW (2005) Influence of catchment-scale military land use on stream physical and organic matter variables in small southeastern plains catchments (USA). Environ Manag 35(5):677–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, p 155

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies (2005) Sustainability at the National Academies: strengthening science-based decision making in developing countries. Available via: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/pgasite/documents/webpage/pga_057633.pdf

  • National Research Council (2005) Decision making for the environment: social and behavioral science research priorities. In: Brewer GD, Stern PC (eds) Panel on Social and Behavioral Science Research Priorities for Environmental Decision Making. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2009) Informing decisions in a changing climate. Panel on Strategies and Methods for Climate-Related Decision Support, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock AD et al (2001) Soil microbial biomass and community composition along an anthropogenic disturbance gradient within a longleaf pine habitat. Ecol Indic 1(2):113–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner S et al (2001) Weather forecasts are for wimps: why water resource managers don’t use climate forecasts, final report. Available via: http://www.isse.ucar.edu/water_conference/CD_files/Additional_Materials/Weather%20Forecasts%20are%20for%20Wimps.pdf

  • Reddy R et al (2003) Determination of indicators of ecological change. Final report. September 2004. Available via: https://www.serdp-estcp.org/Program-Areas/Resource-Conservation-and-Climate-Change/Natural-Resources/Species-Ecology-and-Management/RC-1114

  • Rowe G, Wright G (2001) Expert opinions in forecasting the role of the Delphi technique. In: Armstrong JS (ed) Principles of forecasting: a handbook of researchers and practitioners. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlacko M, Pisano U, Berger G, Lepuschitz K (2013) Bridging the science-policy gap: development and reception of a joint research agenda on sustainable food consumption. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 9(2):105–123, Available at http://sspp.proquest.com/static_content/vol9iss2/1204-019.sedlacko.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigma XI, The Scientific Research Society (1993) Science and public policy: linking users and producers. The Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology and Government, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel B et al (2000–2001) The role of scientists in the natural resource and environmental policy process: a comparison of Canadian and American Publics. J Environ Syst 28(2):133–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter GW (2008) Ecological risk assessment in the United States Environmental Protection Agency: an historical overview. Integr Environ Assess Manag 4(3):285–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG, Ryder SD (2003) Use of the Delphi method in resolving complex water resources issues. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39(1):183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the assistance of many people who helped with this study and who participated in the discussions: Robert Addington, Beverly Collins, John Dilustro, Charles Garten, Thomas A. Greene, Anthony Krzysik, Robert Larimore, Maureen Mulligan, Joseph Prenger, and Peter Swiderek. Jeffrey Fehmi, Bill Goran, Hal Balbach, and Hugh Westbury provided support and helped us focus the effort as it unfolded. The project was funded by the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) Ecosystem Management Project (SEMP), project CS 1114C, to Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by the UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy K. Wolfe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wolfe, A.K., Dale, V.H., Arthur, T., Baskaran, L. (2017). Ensuring that Ecological Science Contributes to Natural Resource Management Using a Delphi-Derived Approach. In: Gray, S., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., Gray, S. (eds) Environmental Modeling with Stakeholders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25053-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics