Skip to main content

Co-operative Management of Auyuittuq National Park: Moving Towards Greater Emphasis and Recognition of Indigenous Aspirations for the Management of Their Lands

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Indigenous Peoples’ Governance of Land and Protected Territories in the Arctic

Abstract

Auyuittuq National Park (Nunavut, Canada) was first established in 1976 as a national park reserve under the National Parks Act of Canada. It was subsequently established as a national park in 2001 pursuant to the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement (NLCA). Park governance is currently a co-operative management framework in accordance with the NLCA, the Inuit Impact and Benefits Agreement and the National Parks Act. In practice, this has been a transformation in organisation from informing and liaising to active participation and engagement of adjacent communities. Although a management plan was recently developed by the Joint Park Management Committee, examination of Inuit aspirations for the Park has been limited. These aspirations form a basis for interpreting the effectiveness of the existing governance arrangements. Further, as an informal arrangement, Inuit Knowledge Working Groups have recently been established to also improve on engagement of the community; in sharing of knowledge and perspectives in support of park research and management activities. The success of this project also remains unexamined.

In the fall of 2012, we met with elders, park staff and Field Unit staff involved in management to explore Inuit aspirations for the park, and to examine the ways in which the objective of knowledge gathering and sharing was being applied as part of management operations, focussing on the community of Pangnirtung where the Park Office is located. A separate study focussed specifically on youth. This chapter explores Pangnirtumiut perspectives on the park, and identifies ongoing issues in the application of Indigenous knowledge as part of its ongoing management. We also contrast this against shifts in processes for implementing management, through analysis of policy and planning negotiations.

Inuit aspirations for the park include concerns for visitor safety, employment, protection of Aboriginal rights (including hunting), and an interest in sharing the history and use of the park area. Despite being called the Joint Park Management Committee, the committee plays more of an oversight role, ensuring key aspirations are appropriately addressed. Other initiatives, for example the Inuit Knowledge Working Groups as an opportunity for community engagement play an important role in sharing of knowledge more broadly, with a focus on the importance of being and remaining knowledgeable about the Land. We explore the implications of a western management system for Inuit directly involved in day to day operations of park management. This, and the perspective and opportunity for youth engagement capture the forward thinking aspirations of the community. In this sense, the park can be defined not as a physical boundary but a social one that captures in a snapshot a process of self-determined community change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change, 26, 413–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiatsis. (2012). Native title and joint management. Comparison of native title and joint management arrangements in states and territories. Retrieved March, 2012, from http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/ntru/jurisdictionaloverviews.html

  • Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1692–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohensky, E. L., & Maru, Y. (2011). Indigenous knowledge, science and resilience: What have we learned from a decade of international literature on “Integration”? Ecology and Society, 16, 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1996). Collaborative management of protected areas: Tailoring the approach to the context. Gland: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, J., & Sharp, J. (2004). Indigenous knowledge and development: A postcolonial caution. Third World Quarterly, 25, 661–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 76, 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, C., & Trott, C. (2010). Flexistowe to Pangnirtung: Gift of memories. Manitoba: Lavenham Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombes, B., Johnson, J., & Howitt, R. (2012). Indigenous geographies I: Mere resource conflicts? The complexities in indigenous land and environmental claims. Progress in Human Geography, 36, 810–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, N. (2008). IUCN guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Gland: IUCN.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and un-making of the third world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A. (2009). Lessons for social science in the study of new polities: Nunavut at 10. Journal of Canadian Studies, 43, 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, C., & Moller, H. (2013). Two from the same cloth? Comparing the operations and outcomes of Mātaitai and Taiāpure for delivering sustainable customary fisheries. He Kohinga Rangihau, University of Otago, New Zealand (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, C., & Stephens, A. (2009). Cross cultural approaches to environmental research and management: A response to the dualisms inherent in western science? Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 39, 159–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, K., & Manseau, M. (2012). Inuit safety culture and its relevance to management. Society and Natural Resources, 25, 176–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, A., & Manseau, M. (2008). Representing traditional knowledge: Resource management and Inuit knowledge of barren-ground caribou. Society and Natural Resources, 21, 404–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, S., Prosper, R., & Gagnon, N. (2010). Two paths one direction: Parks Canada and Aboriginal peoples working together. The George Wright Forum, 27, 222–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legare, A. (1996). The process leading to a land claims agreement and its implementation: The case of the Nunavut Land Claims Settlement. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 16, 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manseau, M., Ayles, B., & Parlee, B. (2005). Traditional ecological knowledge in resource management. In F. Berkes, R. Huebert, H. Fast, M. Manseau, & A. Diduck (Eds.), Breaking ice: Renewable resource and ocean management in the Canadian North (pp. 143–166). Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. (2007). Co-management of a national park: The Wapusk National Park’s experience. Canadian Studies, 61, 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, A., Hepburn, C., Scott, N., Schweikert, K., Turner, R., & Moller, H. (2013). Local people see and care most? Sever depletion of inshore fisheries and its consequences for Maori communities in New Zealand [Electronic version]. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. doi:10.1002/aqc.2378.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCay, B. J., & Jentoft, S. (1996). From the bottom up: Participatory issues in fisheries management. Society and Natural Resources, 93, 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, S. A. (2008). Claiming Nunavut 1971–1999. Victoria: Trafford Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, H. (1996). Customary us of Indigenous wildlife – Towards a bicultural approach to conserving New Zealand’s biodiversity. In B. McFadgen & B. Simpson (Eds.), Papers from a seminar series on biodiversity (pp. 89–125). Wellington: Department of Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, H., Lyver, P., Bragg, C., Newman, J., Clucas, R., Fletcher, D., Kitson, J., McKechnie, S., Scott, D., & Rakiura Titi Islands Administering Body. (2009). Guidelines for cross-cultural participatory action research partnerships: A case study of customary seabird harvest in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 36, 211–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. (2010). Canada’s northern national parks: Unaugmented landscapes, unforgettable experiences, wilderness and homeland. The George Wright Forum, 27, 202–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadasdy, P. (1999). The politics of TEK: Power and the “integration” of knowledge. Arctic Anthropology, 36, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkhata, B. A., & Breen, C. (2010). A framework for exploring integrated learning systems for the governance and management of public protected areas. Environmental Management, 45, 403–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty, M., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., & Manseau, M. (2008). Indigenous knowledge and values in planning for sustainable forestry: Pikangikum First Nation and the Whitefeather forest initiative [electronic version]. Ecology and Society, 13, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks Canada. (1982). Auyuittuq National Park reserve interim management guidelines. Gatineau: Parks Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks Canada. (2010). Auyuittuq National Park of Canada management plan. Gatineau: Parks Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks Canada, & Qikiqtani Inuit Association. (1999). Inuit impact and benefit agreement for Auyuittuq, Quttinirpaaq and Sirmilik National Parks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, T., Wright, H., Notaina, R., Kudlak, A., Smit, B., Ford, J. D., & Furgal, C. (2011). Transmission of environmental knowledge and land skills among Inuit men in Ulukhaktok, Northwest Territories, Canada. Human Ecology, 39, 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, S., & Pretty, J. N. (2010). Nature and culture: Rebuilding lost connections. London: Earthscane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, R., & Fitzgibbon, J. (2004). Co-management of natural resources: A proposed framework. Environmental Management, 33, 876–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2012). Pangnirtung, Nunavut (Code 1293) and Nunavut (Code 62) (table). Census Profile. 2011 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-316-XWE. Ottawa. Retrieved October 24, 2012, from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E

  • Tester, F. J., & Irniq, P. (2008). Inuit Quajimajatuqangit: Social history, politics and the practice of resistance. Arctic, 61, 48–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tester, F. J., & Kulchyski, P. (1994). Tammarnit (Mistakes): Inuit relocation in the Eastern Arctic 1939-63. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N. J., & Berkes, F. (2006). Coming to understanding: Developing conservation through incremental learning in the Pacific Northwest. Human Ecology, 34, 495–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, P. J. (2000). Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management. Arctic, 53, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzner, V., & Manseau, M. (2001). Taking the pulse of collaborative management in Canada’s national parks and national park reserves: Voices from the field. In D. Hamon (Ed.), Crossing boundaries in park management (pp. 253–259). Michigan: The George Wright Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, G., Weighs, F., & Rigby, G. (2008). The use of traditional ecological knowledge and Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit in the management of wildlife of Nunavut: A critical review. Iqaluit: Nunavut Wildlife Management Board.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the contributions of all research participants, including Matthew Nauyuk, Rebecca Nookiguak, Sila Kisa and Sakiasee Sowdlooiapik, and thank Eric Joamie and Jutanie Arnakaq for translation service. A further thanks to Nancy Anilniliak, Maryse Mahy, Margaret Nowdlak, Kathy Hanson, Andrew Maher, Jane Chisholm, and Paul Ashley for background information. Parks Canada provided travel cost and field work support for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Jacobson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jacobson, C. et al. (2016). Co-operative Management of Auyuittuq National Park: Moving Towards Greater Emphasis and Recognition of Indigenous Aspirations for the Management of Their Lands. In: Herrmann, T., Martin, T. (eds) Indigenous Peoples’ Governance of Land and Protected Territories in the Arctic. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25035-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics