Congestion Control in Flow-Aware Networks

  • Jerzy DomżałEmail author
  • Robert Wójcik
  • Andrzej Jajszczyk
Part of the Computer Communications and Networks book series (CCN)


The following seven congestion control mechanisms for Flow-Aware Networks are described and discussed: EFM (Enhanced Flushing Mechanism), EFMP (Enhanced Flushing Mechanism with Priority), RAEF (Remove Active Elastic Flows), RBAEF (Remove and Block Active Elastic Flows), RPAEF (Remove and Prioritize in access Active Elastic Flows), RAMAF (Remove and Accept Most Active Flows), and SCCM (Simple Congestion Control Mechanism). The chapter also covers the issues of multilayer Flow-Aware Networks (MFAN), congestion control in wireless environments, and multipath routing for FAN.


Stream Flow Packet Loss Admission Control Optical Layer Congestion Control Mechanism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Network grade of service parameters and target values for circuit-switched services in the evolving ISDN, ITU-T Recommendation E.721, May 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Domzal and A. Jajszczyk, “New Congestion Control Mechanisms for Flow-Aware Networks,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications ICC 2008, Beijing, China, May 2008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Domzal and A. Jajszczyk, “The Flushing Mechanism for MBAC in Flow-Aware Networks,” in Proc. 4th EURO-NGI Conference on Next Generation Internet Networks, NGI 2008, Krakow, Poland, April 2008, pp. 77–83.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Domżał, R. Wójcik, V. López, J. Aracil, and A. Jajszczyk, “EFMP - a new congestion control mechanism for flow-aware networks,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1137–1148, 2014.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Domzal, R. Wojcik, and A. Jajszczyk, “Reliable Transmission in Flow-Aware Networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Communications Conference GLOBECOM 2009, Honolulu, USA, December 2009, pp. 1 –6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Domzal, N. Ansari, and A. Jajszczyk, “Congestion Control in Wireless Flow-Aware Networks,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications ICC 2011, Kyoto, Japan, June 2011.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Domzal, “Intelligent routing in congested approximate flow-aware networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Communications Conference GLOBECOM, 2012, Anaheim, USA, December 2012, pp. 1751–1756.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Lopez, C. Cardenas, J. A. Hernandez, J. Aracil, and M. Gagnaire, “Extension of the Flow-Aware Networking (FAN) architecture to the IP over WDM environment,” in Proc. 4th International Telecommunication Networking Workshop on QoS in Multiservice IP Networks, Venice, Italy, February 2008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Xu, Y. Tian, and N. Ansari, “Improving TCP Performance in Integrated Wireless Communications Networks,” Computer Networks, vol. 47, pp. 219–237, February 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Xu, Y. Tian, and N. Ansari, “TCP-Jersey for Wireless IP Communications,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 22, pp. 747–756, May 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    “Load balancing data center services.” Cisco Systems, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Zhang-Shen and N. McKeown, “Designing a Predictable Internet Backbone Network,” in HotNets, San Diego, CA, USA, November 2004.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Osborne and A. Simha, Traffic Engineering with MPLS. Pearson Education, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerzy Domżał
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert Wójcik
    • 1
  • Andrzej Jajszczyk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of TelecommunicationsAGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakowPoland

Personalised recommendations