Flow-Aware Networking for Net Neutrality

  • Jerzy DomżałEmail author
  • Robert Wójcik
  • Andrzej Jajszczyk
Part of the Computer Communications and Networks book series (CCN)


This chapter is devoted to the network neutrality debate which can shape the future Internet. First, the net neutrality issue is shown from the network perspective. Then, various definitions of the network neutrality, the history of the concept, and the spectrum of its violations are reviewed. The net neutrality debate is shown from various perspectives, e.g., from network operators, content providers, and governments. Then the solution to the problem given by FAN is described and the possible future developments are mentioned.


Federal Communication Commission Content Provider Network Neutrality Telecom Operator Telephone Company 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    G. Held, “Net neutrality may be a necessity,” International Journal of Network Management, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 1, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Crowcroft, “Net neutrality: the technical side of the debate: a white paper,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Guijarro, V. Pla, J. R. Vidal, and J. Bauset, “Search engine and content providers: neutrality, competition and integration,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 2014. [Online]. Available:
  4. 4.
    F. B. Schneider, “Network Neutrality versus Internet Trustworthiness?” IEEE Security and Privacy, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 3–4, 2008.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. M. Owen, “The Net Neutrality Debate: Twenty Five Years After United States v. AT&T and 120 Years After the Act to Regulate Commerce,” Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 336.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Rafique, C. Yuan, and M. Saeed, “Net Neutrality Paradox: Regulator’s Dilemma,” in 7th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM), 2011, 2011, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Trinh and L. Gyarmati, “How to price internet access for disloyal users under uncertainty,” Annals of Telecommunications - Annales des Telecommunications, vol. 65, no. 3-4, pp. 171–188, 2010. [Online]. Available:
  8. 8.
    G. D’Acquisto and M. Naldi, “How much can content providers afford to pay for network charges?” in 2012 Sixth UKSim/AMSS European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation (EMS), 2012, pp. 257–262.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Economides and J. Tag, “Net Neutrality on the Internet: A Two-sided Market Analysis,” NET Institute, Working Papers 07-14, Sep. 2007. [Online]. Available:
  10. 10.
    A. Tareen, “Next generation broadband access networks evolving market structure and implications of network neutrality regulation,” in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems (CCIS), 2011, pp. 280–284.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Coucheney, P. Maille, and B. Tuffin, “Impact of competition between isps on the net neutrality debate,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–9, 2013.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Bany Mohammed and J. Altmann, “A funding and governing model for achieving sustainable growth of computing e-infrastructures,” Annals of Telecommunications - Annales des Telecommunications, vol. 65, no. 11-12, pp. 739–756, 2010. [Online]. Available:
  13. 13.
    S. Jordan, “Traffic Management and Net Neutrality in Wireless Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 297–309, 2011.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Ganley and B. Allgrove, “Net neutrality: A user’s guide”, Computer Law & Security Report, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 454–463, 2006.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. van Schewick and D. Farber, “Point/Counterpoint Network neutrality nuances,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 31–37, 2009.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Greenstein, “Four nightmares for net neutrality,” Micro, IEEE, vol. 26, pp. 12–13, November/December 2006.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Deeb, S. P. O. Sr., and M. E. Weiner, “A survey on network neutrality; a new form of discrimination based on network profiling,” International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 426–436, 2009.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Ohm, “When network neutrality met privacy,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 30–32, 2010.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Odlyzko, “The delusions of net neutrality,” August 2008, available at:, downloaded on 2010-11-02.
  20. 20.
    A. Joch, “Debating net neutrality,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 14–15, 2009.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    U. F. C. Commission, “PRESERVING THE FREE AND OPEN INTERNET,”, December 2010, commision Report.
  22. 22.
    B. Kim, “A comparison of network neutrality debates between US and South Korea,” in Proc. 11th international conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT 2009.   Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press, February 2009, pp. 1785–1790.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. Larouche, “Law and technology: The network neutrality debate hits Europe,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 22–24, 2009.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Goth, “The Global Net Neutrality Debate: Back to Square One?” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 7–9, July 2010.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Kitsing, “Network neutrality in europe,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ser. ICEGOV ’11.   New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 313–316. [Online]. Available:
  26. 26.
    X. Xiao, Technical, Commercial and Regulatory Challenges of QoS: An Internet Service Model Perspective. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2008.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. B. Tariq, M. Motiwala, N. Feamster, and M. Ammar, “Detecting network neutrality violations with causal inference,” in Proc. 5th international conference on Emerging networking experiments and technologies, CoNEXT 2009, New York, NY, USA, December 2009, pp. 289–300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerzy Domżał
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert Wójcik
    • 1
  • Andrzej Jajszczyk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of TelecommunicationsAGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakowPoland

Personalised recommendations