Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Youngsters Solving Mathematical Problems with Technology pp 209–239Cite as

Youngsters Solving Mathematical Problems with Technology: Summary and Implications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 586 Accesses

Part of the book series: Mathematics Education in the Digital Era ((MEDE,volume 5))

Abstract

The final chapter summarises the overall findings of the Problem@Web project and considers the implications of the findings in terms of how the youngsters of today tackle mathematical problems and communicate their mathematical problem-solving. With data from the youngsters’ participation in two online mathematical problem-solving competitions that were characterised by moderately challenging problems, we found that the youngsters we studied had domain over a set of general-use digital tools and while they were less aware of digital resources with a stronger association with mathematics they were able to gain many capabilities by tackling the mathematical problems and seeking expeditious, appropriate and productive ways of expressing their mathematical thinking. In this respect, they were able to harness their technological skills while simultaneously developing and improving their capacity to create and use a range of mathematical representations. We explain this as co-action between the tool and the solver, with this interconnectedness leading to jointly developed technological skills and mathematical skills that result in the capacity of mathematical problem-solving with technology. Given the possibility of youngsters developing this capacity, a key issue is how this can be harnessed to promote the success of youngsters in mathematics in our digital era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, J., Chiu, M.-H., & Yore, L. (2010). First cycle of PISA (2000–2006): International perspectives on successes and challenges, research and policy directions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbeau, E. J., & Taylor, P. J. (Eds.). (2009). Challenging mathematics in and beyond the classroom: An ICMI Study. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Mora, F., & Reyes-Rodríguez, A. (2013). Cognitive processes developed by students when solving mathematical problems within technological environments. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 1–2, 109–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biagi, F., & Loi, M. (2013). Measuring ICT use and learning outcomes: Evidence from recent econometric studies. European Journal of Education, 48, 28–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borba, M., & Villarreal, M. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, experimentation and visualization. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. (2002). Physical enactment: A powerful representational tool for understanding the nature of covarying relationships? In F. Hitt (Ed.), Representations and mathematics visualization (pp. 63–77). Special Issue of PME-NA & Cinvestav-IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M., Larsen, S., & Lesh, R. (2003). Integrating a models and modeling perspective with existing research and practice. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 465–478). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carreira, S., Amado, N., Jones, K, & Jacinto, H. (Eds.) (2014). Proceedings of the Problem@Web International Conference: Technology, Creativity and Affect in Mathematical Problem Solving. Faro, Portugal: Universidade do Algarve. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/3750.

  • Economist Intelligence Unit. (2015). Driving the skills agenda: Preparing students for the future. London: The Economist. http://www.economistinsights.com/sites/default/files/Drivingtheskillsagenda_0.pdf.

  • English, L. (2008). Interdisciplinary problem solving: A focus on engineering experiences. In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.), Navigating Currents and Charting Directions (Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 187–193). Brisbane: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L., & Sriraman, B. (2010). Problem solving for the 21st century. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers. (Advances in mathematics education) (pp. 263–290). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report. Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14222-7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (2002). Preamble: From models to modeling. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. Van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 7–22). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (2007). Emergent modelling as a precursor to mathematical modelling. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education. The 14th ICMI Study (pp. 137–144). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hegedus, S., Donald, S., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2007). Technology that mediates and participates in mathematical cognition. In D. Pitta-Panzi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME 5 (pp. 1419–1428). Cyprus: University of Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegedus, S., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2009a). Intersecting representation and communication infrastructures. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegedus, S., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2009b). Introduction: The transformative nature of “dynamic” educational technology. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 397–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadijevich, D. M. (2015). A dataset from TIMSS to examine the relationship between computer use and mathematics achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12309.

  • Lesh, R. (1981). Applied mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 235–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R. (2000). Beyond constructivism: Identifying mathematical abilities that are most needed for success beyond school in an age of information. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(3), 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2003a). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism – models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 3–33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (Eds.). (2003b). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–804). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Armella, L., & Hegedus, S. (2009). Co-action with digital technologies. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 505–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Armella, L., Hegedus, S., & Kaput, J. (2008). From static to dynamic mathematics: Historical and representational perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Armella, L., & Sriraman, B. (2010). Symbols and mediation in mathematics education. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 213–232). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Trigo, M. (2004). The role of technology in students’ conceptual constructions in a sample case of problem solving. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 26(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Trigo, M. (2007). Mathematical problem solving: An evolving research and practice domain. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39, 523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullenger, K. S., & Turner, R. S. (Eds.). (2015). New ground: Pushing the boundaries of studying informal learning in science, mathematics, and technology. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törner, G., Schoenfeld, A. H., & Reiss, K. M. (2007). Problem solving around the world: Summing up the state of the art. ZDM, 39(5–6), 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeytun, A., Çetinkaya, B., & Erbaş, A. (2010). Mathematics teachers’ covariational reasoning levels and predictions about students’ covariational reasoning. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1601–1612.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal

    Susana Carreira & Nélia Amado

  2. University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

    Keith Jones

  3. UIDEF, Instituto de Educação Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

    Hélia Jacinto & Sandra Nobre

Authors
  1. Susana Carreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keith Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nélia Amado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hélia Jacinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sandra Nobre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carreira, S., Jones, K., Amado, N., Jacinto, H., Nobre, S. (2016). Youngsters Solving Mathematical Problems with Technology: Summary and Implications. In: Youngsters Solving Mathematical Problems with Technology. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24910-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24910-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24908-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24910-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation