Abstract
In this chapter, we describe and analyse a number of examples of 7th and 8th graders showing diverse ways of expressing their mathematical thinking in solving algebraic word problems with a spreadsheet. Different youngsters’ approaches to situations where quantity variation is involved are characterised. The problems require finding an unknown value under a set of conditions that frame a problem situation. The use of the spreadsheet is thoroughly examined with the aim of highlighting the nature of problem-solving and expressing in the digital tool context as compared to the formal algebraic method; moreover, the ways in which students take advantage of the tool (being guided by and also guiding the spreadsheet distinctive forms of organising and performing variation in columns and cells) are important indicators of their algebraic thinking within the problem-solving activity. Finally, we pay attention to indicators of “co-action” in students’ work on the spreadsheet as it tends to be more related to structuring solutions by means of creating variable-columns than with tentative ways of generating inputs in recipient cells.
Two data sources are used: the online competition collection of participants’ solutions and in-class observations of 8th graders working on the same problems. Our analytic approach is a parallel analysis of solutions from the two settings, assuming that both data sources illuminate each other’s differences and similarities. Our overall purpose is to acquire a view of youngsters solving and expressing algebraic problems concerning quantity variation in terms of their various uses of the spreadsheet.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ainley, J., Bills, L., & Wilson, K. (2004). Constructing meanings and utilities within algebraic tasks. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th PME Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 1–8). Bergen, Norway: PME.
Carreira, S. (1992). A aprendizagem da Trigonometria num contexto de aplicações e modelação com recurso à folha de cálculo (Master Dissertation). Lisbon, Portugal: APM.
Dettori, G., Garuti, R., & Lemut, E. (2001). From arithmetic to algebraic thinking by using a spreadsheet. In R. Sutherland, T. Rojano, A. Bell, & R. Linz (Eds.), Perspectives on school algebra (pp. 191–208). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Haspekian, M. (2003). Instrumental approach to understand the problems of the spreadsheet integration. In T. Triandafillidis & K. Hatzikiriakou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Technology in Mathematics Teaching (pp. 118–124). Athens, Greece: New Technologies Publications.
Haspekian, M. (2005). An “instrumental approach” to study the integration of a computer tool into mathematics teaching: The case of spreadsheets. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10(2), 109–141.
Hegedus, S. (2013). Young children investigating advanced mathematical concepts with haptic technologies: Future design perspectives. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1–2), 87–108.
Kieran, C. (1996). The changing face of school algebra. In C. Alsina, J. M. Alvares, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde, & A. Pérez (Eds.), 8th International Congress on Mathematical Education: Selected Lectures (pp. 271–290). Seville, Spain: SAEM Thales.
Kieran, C. (2004). The core of algebra: Reflections on its main activities. In K. Stacey, H. Chic, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of teaching and learning of algebra: The 12th ICMI Study (pp. 21–34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Kieran, C. (2007). Developing algebraic reasoning: The role of sequenced tasks and teacher questions from the primary to the early secondary school levels. Quadrante, 16(1), 5–26.
Lesh, R., Behr, M., & Post, T. (1987). Rational number relations and proportions. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 41–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (Eds.). (2003). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Lins, R., & Kaput, J. (2004). The early development of algebraic reasoning: The current state of the field. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of teaching and learning of algebra: The 12th ICMI Study (pp. 47–70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Moreno-Armella, L., Hegedus, S., & Kaput, J. (2008). From static to dynamic mathematics: Historical and representational perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 99–111.
Moreno-Armella, L., & Hegedus, S. (2009). Co-action with digital technologies. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 505–519.
Nobre, S., Amado, N., & Carreira, S. (2012). Solving a contextual problem with the spreadsheet as an environment for algebraic thinking development. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 31(1), 11–19.
Ozgun-Koca, S. A. (2000). Using spreadsheets in mathematics education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ERIC Digest). Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/2003-1/math.htm.
Radford, L. (2000). Signs and meanings in students’ emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(3), 237–268.
Rojano, T. (2002). Mathematics learning in the junior secondary school: Students’ access to significant mathematical ideas. In L. English, M. B. Bussi, G. A. Jones, R. A. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 143–161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Tabach, M., Hershkowitz, R., & Arcavi, A. (2008). Learning beginning algebra with spreadsheets in a computer intensive environment. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(1), 48–63.
Weigand, H., & Weller, H. (2001). Changes in working styles in a computer algebra environment: The case of functions. International Journal of Computers in Mathematical Learning, 6(1), 87–111.
Wilson, K. (2007). Naming a column on a spreadsheet. Research in Mathematics Education, 8, 117–132.
Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 379–402.
Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2004). Understanding primes: The role of representation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(3), 164–186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carreira, S., Jones, K., Amado, N., Jacinto, H., Nobre, S. (2016). Digitally Expressing Algebraic Thinking in Quantity Variation. In: Youngsters Solving Mathematical Problems with Technology. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24910-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24910-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24908-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24910-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)