Abstract
Given that solving mathematical problems entails developing ways of thinking and expressing thoughts about challenging situations where a mathematical approach is appropriate, this chapter unveils a theoretical framework that aims to guide a better interpretation of students’ capability to solve mathematical problems with digital technologies, in the context of online mathematical competitions. The main purpose is to provide a way of understanding how students find effective and productive ways of thinking about the problem and how they achieve the solution and communicate it mathematically, based on the digital resources available. By discussing several theoretical tools and constructs, a theoretical stance is developed to conceptualise problem-solving as a synchronous process of mathematisation and of expressing mathematical thinking in which digital tools play a key role. This theorisation draws on the role of external representations and discusses how a digital-mathematical discourse is used to express the development of the conceptual models underlying the solution. In this conceptualisation, a symbiotic relation between the individual and the digital tools used in problem-solving and expressing is postulated and outlined: the inseparability of humans and media sustains the idea that students and tools are agents performing knowledge in co-action, while approaching mathematical problems. Looking at the solution to a problem is seeing a fusion of the solver’s knowledge and the tool’s built-in knowledge, rather than an aggregate of both or a complementarity between them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33, 131–152.
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183–198.
Amado, N., Carreira, S., Nobre, S., & Ponte, J. P. (2010). Representations in solving a word problem: The informal development of formal methods. In M. F. Pinto & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 137–144). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME.
Artigue, M. & Bardini, C. (2010). New didactical phenomena prompted by TI-nspire specificities: The mathematical component of the instrumentation process. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME 6 (pp. 1171–1180). Lyon, France: INRP.
Borba, M., & Villarreal, M. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, experimentation and visualization. New York, NY: Springer.
Carreira, S. (2003). Problem solving with technology: How it changes students’ mathematical activity. In T. Triandafillidis & K. Hatzikiriakou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching (ICTMT 6) (pp. 67–74). Athens, Greece: New Technologies Publications.
Carreira, S. (2009). Matemática e tecnologias: Ao encontro dos “nativos digitais” com os “manipulativos virtuais”. Quadrante, 18(1 & 2), 53–86.
Carreira, S. (2015). Mathematical problem solving beyond school: Digital tools and students mathematical representations. In J. S. Cho (Ed.), Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 93–113). New York: Springer.
Carreira, S., Amado, N., Ferreira, R. A., & Silva, J. (2012). A web-based mathematical problem solving competition in Portugal: Strategies and approaches. In Pre-Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME 12) – Topic Study 34 (pp. 3098–3107). Seoul, South Chorea: ICMI.
Clements, D. (2000). From exercises and tasks to problems and projects: Unique contributions of computers to innovative mathematics education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 9–47.
Cook, D., & Ralston, J. (2005). Building the cognitive bridge: Children, information technology and thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 10(3), 207–223.
Doorman, L., & Gravemeijer, K. (2009). Emergent modeling: Discrete graphs to support the understanding of change and velocity. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 199–211.
English, L., & Sriraman, B. (2010). Problem solving for the 21st century. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 263–295). New York, NY: Springer.
Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: Insights from a longitudinal study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 361–372.
Gadanidis, G., & Geiger, V. (2010). A social perspective on technology-enhanced mathematical learning: From collaboration to performance. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42, 91–104.
Gill, S., & Borchers, J. (2003). Knowledge in co-action: Social intelligence in collaborative design activity. AI and Society, 17, 322–339. doi:10.1007/s00146-003-0286-6.
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Cdß Press.
Gravemeijer, K. (1997). Solving word problems: A case of modelling? Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 389–397.
Gravemeijer, K. (2002). Preamble: From models to modeling. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. Van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 7–22). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Gravemeijer, K. (2007). Emergent modelling as a precursor to mathematical modelling. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education. The 14th ICMI study (pp. 137–144). New York, NY: Springer.
Gravemeijer, K., Lehrer, R., van Oers, B., & Verschaffel, L. (Eds.). (2002). Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (1999). Visual and symbolic reasoning in mathematics: Making connections with computers? Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 59–84.
Hegedus, S., Donald, S., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2007). Technology that mediates and participates in mathematical cognition. In D. Pitta-Panzi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME 5 (pp. 1419–1428). University of Cyprus.
Hegedus, S., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2009a). Intersecting representation and communication infrastructures. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 399–412.
Hegedus, S., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2009b). Introduction: The transformative nature of “dynamic” educational technology. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 397–398.
Hegedus, S., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2010). Accommodating the instrumental genesis framework within dynamic technological environments. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(19), 26–31.
Hegedus, S., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2011). The emergence of mathematical structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 369–388.
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2008). Next steps in implementing Kaput’s research programme. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 85–97.
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2009). The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning. Human Development, 52(2), 129–147.
Jacinto, H., Amado, N., & Carreira, S. (2009). Internet and mathematical activity within the frame of “Sub14”. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1221–1230). Lyon, France: INRP.
Jacinto, H., & Carreira, S. (2012). Problem solving in and beyond the classroom: perspectives and products from participants in a web-based mathematical competition. In Pre-Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME 12) – Topic Study 15 (pp. 2933–2942). Seoul, South Corea: ICMI.
Jacinto, H., Carreira, S., & Amado, N. (2011). Home technologies: How do they shape beyond-school mathematical problem solving activity? In M. Joubert, A. Clark-Wilson, & M. McCabe (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching (ICTMT10) (pp. 160–165). Portsmouth, UK: University of Portsmouth.
Lesh, R. (1981). Applied mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 235–364.
Lesh, R. (2000). Beyond constructivism: Identifying mathematical abilities that are most needed for success beyond school in an age of information. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(3), 177–195.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2003a). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism – models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 3–33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (Eds.). (2003b). Beyond constructivism – models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Lesh, R., & Harel, G. (2003). Problem solving, modeling, and local conceptual development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2 & 3), 157–189.
Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–804). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lester, F., & Kehle, P. (2003). From problem solving to modeling: The evolution of thinking about research on complex mathematical activity. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism – models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 501–517). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Medina, R., Suthers, D., & Vatrapu, R. (2009). Representational practices in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 185–205). New York, NY: Springer.
Moreno-Armella, L., & Hegedus, S. (2009). Co-action with digital technologies. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 505–519.
Moreno-Armella, L., Hegedus, S., & Kaput, J. (2008). From static to dynamic mathematics: Historical and representational perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 99–111.
Nistal, A., Van Dooren, W., Clarebout, G., Elen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Conceptualising, investigating and stimulating representational flexibility in mathematical problem solving and learning: A critical review. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 627–636.
Nobre, S., Amado, N., Carreira, S., & Ponte, J. (2011). Algebraic thinking of grade 8 students in solving word problems with a spreadsheet. In M. Pytlak, E. Swoboda & T. Rowland (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 521–531). Poland: ERME, University of Rzeszów.
Nobre, S., Amado, N., & Carreira, S. (2012). Solving a contextual problem with the spreadsheet as an environment for algebraic thinking development. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 31(1), 11–19. doi:10.1093/teamat/hrr026.
Noss, R. (2001). For a learnable mathematics in the digital cultures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 21–46.
Noss, R., Hoyles, C., Mavrikis, M., Geraniou, E., Gutierrez-Santos, S., & Pearce, D. (2009). Broadening the sense of “dynamic”: A microworld to support students’ mathematical generalisation. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 493–503.
Ntenza, S. P. (2006). Investigating forms of children’s writing in grade 7 mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 321–345.
Reeuwijk, M., & Wijers, M. (2003). Explanations why? The role of explanations in answers to (assessment) problems. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism – models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 191–202). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Santos-Trigo, M. (2004). The role of technology in students’ conceptual constructions in a sample case of problem solving. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 26(2), 1–17.
Santos-Trigo, M. (2007). Mathematical problem solving: An evolving research and practice domain. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39, 523–536.
Shaffer, D., & Kaput, J. (1999). Mathematics and virtual culture: An evolutionary perspective on technology and mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 97–119.
Shield, M., & Galbraith, P. (1998). The analysis of student expository writing in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 29–52.
Stahl, G. (Ed.). (2009a). Studying virtual math teams. New York, NY: Springer.
Stahl, G. (2009b). Interactional methods and social practices in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 41–55). New York, NY: Springer.
Stahl, G. (2013). Translating Euclid: Designing a human-centered mathematics. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
Stahl, G. (2015). Constructing triangles together: The development of mathematical group cognition. Retrieved from http://gerrystahl.net/elibrary/analysis/analysis.pdf.
Vessey, I. (1991). Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graph versus tables literature. Decision Sciences, 22, 219–240.
Villarreal, M., & Borba, M. (2010). Collectives of humans-with-media in mathematics education: Notebooks, blackboards, calculators, computers… and notebooks throughout 100 years of ICMI. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(1), 49–62.
Zawojewski, J., & Lesh, R. (2003). A models and modeling perspective on problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism – models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 317–336). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G., & Dick, T. P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: The perspective of constructs. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1169–1207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carreira, S., Jones, K., Amado, N., Jacinto, H., Nobre, S. (2016). Theoretical Perspectives on Youngsters Solving Mathematical Problems with Technology. In: Youngsters Solving Mathematical Problems with Technology. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24910-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24910-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24908-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24910-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)