Abstract
This chapter compares and contrasts the design of nanotechnology cleanrooms and bio-containment Biological Safety Laboratories. As examples, suiting up in a cleanroom is necessary to protect product or test specimens, while suiting up in a bio-containment facility is necessary to protect people. A parallel important difference between the two types of spaces is that nanotechnology cleanrooms typically have a slight over pressurization with respect to adjacent building spaces to prevent outside contamination from coming into the clean room while Biological Safety rooms are under pressurized to be sure that nothing gets out of the rooms. Design considerations for space organization, construction, ventilation requirements, space outfitting, furnishings, finishes, and fine details are also compared and contrasted. Finally, considerations for collocating cleanrooms and Biological Safety Laboratories are covered and the Birck Nanotechnology Center at Purdue University is used as an example of the trade-offs that must be made when collocating.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
J.R. Weaver, “A Design for Combining Biological and Semiconductor Cleanrooms for Nanotechnology Research,” JIEST 48(1), 75–82 (2005).
- 3.
Primary Containment for Biohazards: Selection, Installation and Use of Biological Safety Cabinets. 3rd Edition 2007 CDC.
- 4.
http://www.nsf.org/business/biosafety_cabinetry/index.asp; NSF International is a public health and safety company, not to be confused with the National Science Foundation.
Bibliography
D.M. Carlberg, Cleanroom Microbiology for the Non-microbiologist (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2005). ISBN 0-8493-1996-X
D.S. Ensor, A.M. Dixon, Environmental Monitoring for Cleanrooms and Controlled Environments. Drugs and the Pharmaceutical Sciences (Informa, New York, 2006). ISBN 978-0-8247-2359-0
ISO 14698-1:2003, Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments—Biocontamination control—Part 1: General principles and methods by ISO/TC 209
B. Ljungqvist, B. Reinmuller, Practical Safety Ventilation in Pharmaceutical and Biotech Cleanrooms (PDA/DHI, Bethesda, MD/River Grove, IL, 2006)
Multiple publications are listed by The Pharmaceutical & Healthcare Sciences Society, http://www.phss.co.uk/?cart=yes&do=cat&cid=4
The Baker Company, Introduction to Biological Safety Cabinets (2010), http://www.bakerco.com/intro-to-biological-safety-cabinets.html
University of Pennsylvania, Clean Benches vs. Biosafety Cabinets (6 November 2009), http://www.ehrs.upenn.edu/programs/bio/biologicalsafetycabinets/cleanbenches.html
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; U.S. National Institutes of Health (2000), http://www.cdc.gov/od/ohs/pdffiles/BSC-3.pdf
Acknowledgement
Thanks to Mike Somin and John Weaver who synthesized material from several sources for the initial draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soueid, A., Teague, E.C., Murday, J. (2015). Bio-containment. In: Soueid, A., Teague, E., Murday, J. (eds) Buildings for Advanced Technology. Science Policy Reports. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24892-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24892-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24890-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24892-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)