Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

A Social Psychology Perspective on The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict pp 115–131Cite as

The Jewish–Israeli Ethos of Conflict

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Peace Psychology Book Series ((PPBS))

Abstract

One of Bar-Tal’s main contributions is the concept of ethos of conflict. Ethos is defined as configuration of central societal beliefs that provides central characterization to the society and gives it a particular orientation. Ethos of conflict evolves during an intractable conflict. It is a major component of the psychological repertoire that allows a society to cope effectively with the stressful conditions produced by a conflict. But at the same time, the ethos functions as a barrier to the peace process by providing an epistemic basis for continuation of the conflict. It includes the following specific themes: shared beliefs about the goals in the conflict, security, own victimization, positive self-image, delegitimization of the opponent, patriotism, the need for national unity, and peace. The chapter elaborates on the content of these shared beliefs while focusing specifically on the Israeli–Jewish ethos during the years 1967–2013. The way ethos of conflict changes is also discussed as are potential causes of changes in ethos. In this context, the chapter refers to major events and major information as causes of change in ethos. It further discusses the reciprocal relationship between ethos of conflict and conflict resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are several studies that analyzed the ethos of conflict at the individual level, while trying to assess the degree of adherence of an individual to the ethos of conflict. As noted, this chapter will focus mostly on the collective level.

References

  • Abelson, R. P. (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apter, D. E. (Ed.). (1997). Legitimization of violence. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arviv-Abromovich, R. (2010). Societal beliefs about the Israeli-Arab Palestinian conflict transmitted in national ceremonies -1948-2006. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Tel-Aviv University. (in Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D. (2000). Shared beliefs in a society: Social psychological analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., & Antebi, D. (1992a). Beliefs about negative intentions of the world: A study of the Israeli siege mentality. Political Psychology, 13, 633–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., & Antebi, D. (1992b). Siege mentality in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2011). Socio-psychological barriers to conflict resolution. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: Social psychological perspective (pp. 217–240). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., Halperin, E., & Oren, N. (2010). Socio-psychological barriers to peace making: The case of the Israeli Jewish society. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4, 63–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., Jacobson, D., & Klieman, A. S. (Eds.). (1998). Security concerns: Insights from the Israeli experience. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., & Oren, N. (2000). Ethos as an expression of identity: Its changes in transition from conflict to peace in the Israeli case. Jerusalem: The Leonard Davis Institute for International Relations, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Raviv, A., & Dgani-Hirsh, A. (2009). The influence of the ethos of conflict on Israeli Jews’ interpretation of Jewish-Palestinian encounters. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(1), 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., & Sharvit, K. (2007). Psychological earthquake of the Israeli Jewish society: Changing opinions following the Camp David Summit and Al Aqsa Intifada. In J. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), The Israeli-Palestinian conflict: From conflict resolution to conflict management (pp. 169–202). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., & Sharvit, K. (2008). Psychological foundations of Israeli Jews’ reactions to Al Aqsa Intifada: The role of the threatening transitional context. In V. M. Esses & R. Vernon (Eds.), Explaining the breakdown of ethnic relations: Why neighbors kill (pp. 147–170). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., Sharvit, K., Halperin, E., & Zafran, A. (2012). Ethos of conflict: The concept and its measurement. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18(1), 40–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., & Staub, E. (1997). Patriotism in the lives of individuals and nations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., & Teichman, Y. (2005). Stereotypes and prejudice in conflict: Representation of Arabs in Israeli Jewish society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., Zoran, H., Cohen, H., & Magal, T. (2010). Expressions of ethos of conflict in Sabbath leaflets of synagogues during the Cast Lead operation in the Gaza Strip. Israel Studies in Language and Society, 3(2), 33–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben Meir, Y., & Bagno-Moldavsky, O. (2010). Vox populi: Trends in Israeli public opinion on national security 2004-2009. Memorandum No. 106, Tel Aviv: Institute for National Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shaul, N. S. (1997). Mythical expressions of siege in Israeli films. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. W. (Ed.). (1990). Conflict: Human needs theory. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, O. (2007). The crystallization and transformations of Jewish-Israeli identity: A study of identity reflection in Hebrew readers of the 20 th century. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Tel-Aviv University. (in Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (2007). The Israeli-Palestinian peace process and its vicissitudes: Insights from attitude theory. American Psychologist, 62(4), 287–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesberg, L., Northrup, T. A., & Thorson, S. J. (1989). Intractable conflicts and their transformation. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, S. (2010). Barriers to peace: Protected values in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), Barriers to peace: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict (pp. 135–177). Jerusalem: Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, H., & Katz, E. (1993). The Intifada is not a war: Jewish opinion on the Israel-Arab conflict. In A. A. Cohen & G. Wolfsfeld (Eds.), Framing the Intifada: People and media. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, H., & Zaller, J. (1984). The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, B. (2001). Righteous victims: A history of the Zionist-Arab conflict, 1881-2001. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oren, N. (2005). The impact of major events in the Arab-Israeli conflict on the ethos of conflict of the Israeli Jewish society (1967-2000). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Tel- Aviv University. (in Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oren, N. (2009). The Israeli ethos of conflict 1967–2005. Working Paper #27. Fairfax, VA: Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University. See http://scar.gmu.edu/wp_27_oren.pdf

  • Oren, N. (2010). Israeli identity formation and the Arab-Israeli conflict in election platforms, 1969-2006. Journal of Peace Research, 47(2), 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oren, N. (Forthcoming). The Israeli ethos and the Arab-Israeli conflict 1967–2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oren, N., & Bar-Tal, D. (2006). Ethos and identity: Expressions and changes in the Israeli Jewish society. Estudios de Psicología, 27(3), 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oren, N., & Bar-Tal, D. (2007). The detrimental dynamics of delegitimization in intractable conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian case. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(1), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porat, R., Halperin, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2015). The effect of sociopsychological barriers on the processing of new information about peace opportunities. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(1), 93–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D. G. (2005). Whither ripeness theory? Working Paper #25. Fairfax, VA: Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University. See http://scar.gmu.edu/wp_25_pruitt.pdf

  • Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (2004). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1989). Stability and change in American value priorities, 1968-1981. American Psychologist, 44(5), 775–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, S. (1988). The protracted Arab-Israeli conflict: A temporal-spatial analysis. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, 10, 54–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schori-Eyal, N., Klar, Y., & Roccas, S. (2013, January). Effects of perpetual ingroup victimhood orientation on cognition in current conflicts. Poster presented at the fourteenth annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. New Orleans, LA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, J., & Shamir, M. (2000). The anatomy of public opinion. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharvit, K. (2014). How conflict begets conflict: Activation of the ethos of conflict in times of distress in a society involved in an intractable conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 252–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 819–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. W. (2000). Ripeness: The hurting stalemate and beyond. In P. C. Stern & D. Druckman (Eds.), International conflict resolution after the Cold War (pp. 225–250). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University, Arlington, VA, USA

    Neta Oren

Authors
  1. Neta Oren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neta Oren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel

    Keren Sharvit

  2. Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Psychology, Herzilya, Israel

    Eran Halperin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oren, N. (2016). The Jewish–Israeli Ethos of Conflict. In: Sharvit, K., Halperin, E. (eds) A Social Psychology Perspective on The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24841-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation