Recent Efforts to Broaden Informal Computer Science Education

  • William Aspray
Part of the History of Computing book series (HC)


This chapter describes some examples of recent efforts to broaden informal computer science education. The first half of the chapter discusses efforts targeted primarily at young people. Three organizations are profiled here: the Computer Science Collaboration Project (funded by the National Science Foundation), GoldieBlox (a construction toy intended to inspire interest in science and engineering among young girls), and Black Girls Code (an organization bringing technology education to African-American girls aged 7–17). The second half of the chapter concerns entrepreneurial efforts to teach computing to college-age and adult women. We present four examples: Geek Girl, Girl Develop It, PyLadies, and she++. They are all small, agile, entrepreneurial organizations created by small groups of people – mostly from the professional community. The skills that are taught here are mostly basic programming skills or the ability to use off-the-shelf technologies. Thus, these experiences represent not only an alternative path to formal education, but they emphasize a lower and less conceptual skill set that can be learned and put into practice quickly.


Young Girl Black Girl Boot Camp Entrepreneurial Effort Super Bowl 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Agarwal, A. she++: The documentary trailer release. Huffington Post (16 December 2014). Accessed 20 Dec 2014.
  2. Bakardjieva, M. 2005. Internet society: The internet in everyday life. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, L.J., and W. Aspray. 2006. The state of research on girls and IT. In Women and information technology, ed. J. McGrath Cohoon and W. Aspray, 3–54. MIT Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Bissett, J.L. 2011. DigiGirlz day helps young women learn tech world. Delaware State News, 30 March. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  5. Black Girls Code. 2015. Organizational website. Accessed 5 Oct 2015.
  6. Bort, J. 2013. These teens are solving the skills shortage by teaching other kids how to code. Business Insider, 18 August. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  7. Britsch, B., and K. Peterson. 2009. Collaboration as a means to building capacity: The national girls collaborative project, In A watershed moment: The first national conference on science and technology in out-of-school time. Chicago: Project Exploration and the Coalition for Science After School. Accessed 27 Oct 2015.
  8. Cassell, J., and H. Jenkins (eds.). 1998. From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cates, K. 2014. Girls can be gamers, too. Accessed 19 Jan 2015.
  10. Causer, C. 2013. Ribbons and wheels and engineers – That’s what girls are made of. IEEE Potentials September/October: 15–17.Google Scholar
  11. CBS News. 2014. Aiming for 1 million ‘Girls Who Code’. December 11. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  12. 2014. CodeEd organization website. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
  13. D’Ignazio, C. 2013. About Kimberly Bryant, 18 November. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
  14. Deckelmann, S. 2013. Tending the garden: A blog about postgres, open source and the web. Accessed 27 Oct 2015.
  15. Devaney, L. 2014. 6 STEM resources to engage women, minorities. Accessed 19 Jan 2015.
  16. Dickinson, K. 2013. she++ documentary film. Accessed 20 Dec 2014.
  17. Dockterman, E. 2014. The war on pink: GoldieBlox toyes ignite debate over what’s good for girls. Time, 2 February.Google Scholar
  18. Dweck, C. 2000. Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  19. Faircloth, K. 2014. GoldieBlox means well but doesn’t live up to the hype., 11 February. Accessed 20 Apr 2015.
  20. Farr, C. 2012. CodeNow, the nonprofit that teaches inner city kids to code, lands in San Francisco. Venture Beat, 18 October. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  21. Fellows, M.R. and I. Parberry. 1993. SIGACT trying to get kids excited about CS. Computing Research News 5(1). Accessed 27 Oct 2015.
  22. Flanigan, R.L. 2014. Girl develop it brings coding for women to Rochester. Accessed 10 Oct 2014.
  23. Frank, B.H. 2014. Black Girls Code, win Microsoft AzureDev grants, January 15. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
  24. Gallagher, B. 2013. She++ documentary features industry leaders, Stanford professors and students talking women in tech [Video]. TechCrunch. Accessed 20 Dec 2014.
  25. Gilpin, L. 2014. Black Girls Code founder Kimberly Bryant: Engineer, entrepreneur, mother. TechRepublic, 7 April. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
  26. Girls Who Code. Organization website. Accessed 15 Nov 2015.
  27. Guler, S.D., and M.E. Rule. 2013. Invent-abling: Enabling inventiveness through craft. International Conference on Interactive Design and Children 2013: 368–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ha, A. 2014. Y Combinator backs its next nonprorofit, coding education program CodeNow. TechCrunch. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  29. Hamilton, W. 2014. For some, learning coding is a calculated strategy; more kids are taking computer classes. But will that boost college and career prospects? Los Angeles Times, 2 August.Google Scholar
  30. Harrison, L. and Reshma Saujani. 2015. Fast company, (May 13, 2013)Google Scholar
  31. Iridescent, Organization website. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  32. Jong, A. 2012. Leveling the playing field: How to get more women in tech. The Daily Muse, Forbes, 6 April.Google Scholar
  33. Kafai, Y.B. and Q. Burke. 2014. Beyond game design for broadening participation: Building new clubhouses of computing for girls. genderIT 2014, 21.Google Scholar
  34. Kafai, Y.B., C. Heeter, J. Denner, and J. Sun. 2008. Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kavilanz, P. 2014. GoldieBlox ad makes Super Bowl history. CNN Wire, 31 January.Google Scholar
  36. Keen, A. 2014. Keen on…iridescent: How girls are 3 years ahead of everyone else in the race to innovate. TechCrunch, 13 March. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  37. Landis, A. 2014. Annual Digigirlz day motivates female leaders. Sparks Tribune, 5 August. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  38. Landry, L. 2014. Unexpected entrepreneur proves what can happen when you ‘Keep your opportunities open’. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
  39. Lynn, S. 2013. American Express, BlackGirlsCode, and Internet Backlash. PC Magazine, 9 December.,2428084,00.asp. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
  40. Marikar, S. 2014. Winning girls over, piece by piece. New York Times, 25 December.Google Scholar
  41. Marra, R., K. Petrson, and B. Britsch. 2008. Collaboration as a means to building capacity: Results and future directions of the national girls collaborative project. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 14: 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mid-Pacific ICT Center, Geek girl. n.d. Accessed 5 Oct 2015.
  43. Miller, C. 2013. Opening a gateway for girls to enter the computing field. New York Times, April 2.Google Scholar
  44. National Girls Collaborative Project. 2015. Organization website. Accessed 19 Jan 2015.
  45. Newcomb, T. 2013. GoldieBlox toy takes girls for a spin into engineering. Engineering News-Record 270(12): 17.Google Scholar
  46. Newcomb, T. 2014. Targeting the toy aisle to lure girls into engineering. Engineering News-Record 272(3): 45.Google Scholar
  47. Ntim, L. 2013. When black girls code, 12 December. Accessed 14 Dec 2014.
  48. Petersen, L. 2013. Girl develop it co-founder provides keys to the coding kingdom. Accessed 10 Oct 2014.
  49. Peterson, K. 2012. The national girls collaborative project: Building the capacity of STEM practitioners to develop a diverse workforce. Computing Research News 24(3). Accessed 27 Oct 2015.
  50. Peterson, K., and B. Britsch. 2014. The national girls collaborative project: Creating equitable science learning experiences and the importance of publishing student research. The Journal of Experimental Secondary Science. Accessed 19 Jan 2015.
  51. Phanor-Faury, A. 2014. Black girls code’s Kim Bryant talks bits and bytes. Ebony, 19 March. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
  52. PyLadies. 2014. Organizational website. Accessed 9 Oct 2014.
  53. Reyes, J. 2014.’s Corinne Warnshuis named first executive director of Girl Develop It. Technically. Accessed 27 Oct 2015.
  54. Robehmed, N. 2013. Black Girls Code tackles tech inclusion. Forbes, 30 August. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
  55. Scott, R. 2014. New York after-school program takes a hands-on approach. Youth Today, 5 May. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  56. Shah, A. 2012. Geek chicks, PyLadies, a gang of female computer programmers. LA Weekly, 16 February. Accessed 27 Oct 2015.
  57. Shaurette, B. 2013. Intro to Python, April 6 – Recap. Accessed 27 Oct 2015.
  58. she++, Organization website. 2015. Accessed 7 Jan 2015.
  59. Shpilberg, S. 2014. What GoldieBlox is telling my girl, which I won’t let her hear. Huffington Post, 26 January.Google Scholar
  60. Shumaker, L. 2014. Oprah gives San Francisco’s Kimberly Bryant a standing o-vation, 17 November. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.
  61. Startup California. 2012. Interview: Leslie Fishlock. Startup California. 2012. Accessed 5 Oct 2015.
  62. The Computer Science Collaboration Project, Exemplary practices for engaging Hispanic/Latino(a) youth in computer science, July 2012. Accessed 19 Jan 2015.
  63. Truong, A. 2014. Y Combinator’s new nonprofit helps tech companies teach kids to code. Fast Company, 27 February. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
  64. Vandewater, C. 2014. No boys allowed: 6 STEM programs that empower girls. Accessed 19 Jan 2015.
  65. Vedas, S. 2014. Turning attention to next wave of female innovators, 11 June. Accessed 19 Jan 2014.
  66. Wagstaff, K. 2014. Girls make the grade at the white house science fair. NBC News, 23 May. Accessed 27 Oct 2015.
  67. Wallace, K. 2014. Girl empowerment ads like GoldieBlox: Do they work? CNN Wire, 8 November.Google Scholar
  68. Weber, K. 2013. Breaking the glass slipper. America, 23 December.Google Scholar
  69. Weiss, E. 2013. Can toys create future engineers? The New Yorker, 12 January.Google Scholar
  70. Winter, C. 2010. Kamvar, Schiavoni: Techies with a cause. Businessweek, 3 June. Accessed 16 Dec 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Aspray
    • 1
  1. 1.School of InformationUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations