Abstract
What does it mean to reimagine a school? It doesn’t just mean looking at it through a different lens, it means reimagining its purpose because the meaning of culture, values, and performance are all related to purpose. If you change the purpose of a school then you allow everything else to change, but if the purpose does not change then it is difficult to change anything. Thus, our aim is to directly or indirectly question the purpose of schools. Schools have not organizationally changed for centuries, why? Do schools teach through the organizational experience they offer as well as the curriculum? Has the narrow focus on exam performance undermined the wider educational purpose of schools? Are there approaches teachers and school leaders can adopt to incrementally take back the wider educational purpose of their schools? We have started with many questions, but in the following book, we will seek to shed light on them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berliner, D. C., & Glass, G. V. (2014). 50 myths and lies that threaten America’s public schools: The real crisis in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Bernstein, B. (2002). Basil Bernstein’s theory of social class, educational codes and social control. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 525–526. doi:10.1080/0142569022000038378.
Bidwell, C. E. (1996). The collegial focus: Teaching fields, collegial relationships and instructional practices in American high schools. Sociology of Education, 72(4), 234–256.
Chiaburu, D. S. (2006). Managing organizational change in transition economies. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19, 738–746.
Claxton, G. (2008). What’s the point of school? Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
Coley, R., & Baker, B. (2013). Poverty and education: Finding the way forward. ETS Center for Research on Human Capital and Education Research and Development. ETS Publication. https://www.ets.org/s/research/pdf/poverty_and_education_report.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2015.
Coulby, D. (1987). It’s nothing personal: Class opposition to the curriculum. In T. Booth & D. Coulby (Eds.), Producing and reducing disaffection: Curricula for all (pp. 164–171). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Gajdamaschko, N. (2005). Vygotsky on imagination: Why an understanding of the imagination is an important issue for schoolteachers. Teaching Education, 16(1), 13–22. doi:10.1080/1047621052000341581.
Galinsky, E. (1999). Ask the Children: What America’s children really think about working parents. New York: William Morrrow and Company, Inc.
Handy, C., & Aitken, R. (1986). Understanding schools as organisations. London: Penguin.
Hurn, C. J. (1993). The limits and possibilities of schooling: An introduction to the sociology of education (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308. doi:10.2307/2392498.
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1983). Organizations and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Layard, R., Clark, A. E., Cornaglia, F., Powdthavee, N., & Vernoit, J. (2014). What predicts a successful life? A life-course model of well-being. The Economic Journal, 124(580), F720–F738. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12170.
Montgomery, A. J., & Kehoe, I. (2010). Reimagining our school system. The Psychologist, 23(6), 486–487.
Morais, A., Neves, I., Davies, B., & Daniels, H. (2001). Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contributions of Basil Bernstein to research. New York: Peter Lang.
Murphy, J., & Meyers, C. V. (2008). Turning around failing schools: Leadership lessons from the organizational sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
NAHT. (2015). http://www.naht.org.uk/welcome/news-and-media/key-topics/child-protection/schools-are-providing-435m-of-unfunded-support-for-children/. Accessed 13 May 2015.
Orfield, G., Kucsera, J., & Siegel-Hawley, G. (2012). E pluribus … separation: Deepening double desegregation for more students. Los Angeles: The Civil Rights Project. http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/mlk-national/e-pluribus…separation-deepening-double-segregation-for-more-students/orfield_epluribus_revised_omplete_2012.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2015.
Snyder, B. R. (1971). The hidden curriculum. New York: Knopf.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Creative thinking in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 325–338. doi:10.1080/00313830308595.
Vrizas, Κ. (1992). Social inequalities and educational system. Εkpaideftika, 25–26, 107–113.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Montgomery, A., Karagianni, D., Androutsou, D. (2016). Reimagining School: Is It Possible?. In: Montgomery, A., Kehoe, I. (eds) Reimagining the Purpose of Schools and Educational Organisations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24699-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24699-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24697-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24699-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)