Abstract
The study of human conceptualisations of landscape, as they are encoded in the world’s languages, has the potential to provide answers to some basic linguistic questions, such as:
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Pocock acknowledges the limitations of his findings, pointing out that “the overall correspondence between possessed information and the elicited map is a function of graphicacy”, and that it may be unrealistic to assume equivalence between groups.
- 2.
Phenology is the study of recurring plant and animal life cycle stages, or phenophases, such as leafing and flowering of plants, maturation of agricultural crops, emergence of insects, and migration of birds (USA National Phenology Network website).
- 3.
To be described below.
- 4.
See orrega:d.u below
- 5.
See san.n.a ka:nu ka:d.u below
- 6.
These terms are explained below.
- 7.
BG goes on to warn about the fruit of the ge:ru tree: the flesh is edible, but the seed is poisonous.
- 8.
This is a discursive strategy frequently used by BG: the representation of an event or a process by means of a mini-conversation between him and an unspecified partner, or group of partners.
- 9.
BG goes on to relate the myth of how the Se:t.a ka:nu came into being.
- 10.
BG goes on to tell of an incident in which he was attacked by a bear while looking for honey in an od.d.uga:ḍu.
- 11.
BG goes on to tell the story of the wife of an acquaintance who was trampled to death by an elephant while collecting yams in a flatland forest .
References
Si A. Biology in language documentation. Lang Doc Conserv. 2011;5:169–86.
Kitchin R. Cognitive maps: what are they and why study them? J Environ Psychol. 1994;14:1–19.
Burenhult N, Levinson S. Language and landscape: a cross-linguistic perspective. Lang Sci. 2008;30(2-3):135–50.
Mark D, Turk A, Burenhult N, Stea D. Landscape in language: an introduction. In: Mark D, Turk A, Burenhult N, Stea D, editors. Landscape in language: transdisciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2011.
Johnson L, Hunn E, editors. Landscape ethnoecology: concepts of biotic and physical space. New York: Berghahn; 2011.
Hunn E, Meilleur B. Toward a theory of landscape ethnoecological classification. In: Mann L, Hunn E, editors. Landscape ethnoecology: concepts of biotic and physical space. New York: Berghahn; 2011.
Gärling T, Book A, Lindberg E. Cognitive mapping of large-scale environments: the interrelationship of action plans, acquisition, and orientation. Environ Behav. 1984;16(3):3–34.
Leutgeb S, Leutgeb J, Barnes C, Moser E, McNaughton B, Moser M-B. Independent codes for spatial and episodic memory in hippocampal neuronal ensembles. Science. 2005;309:619–23.
McNaughton B, Battaglia F, Jensen O, Moser E, Moser M-B. Path integration and the neural basis of the ‘cognitive map’. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:663–78.
Pocock D. Some characteristics of mental maps: an empirical study. Trans Inst Br Geogr New Ser. 1976;1(4):493–512.
Linde C, Labov W. Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language. 1975;51(4):924–39.
Burrow T, Emeneau M. A Dravidian etymological dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1984.
Pawley A. Lexicalization. In: Tannen D, Alatis J, editors. Languages and linguistics: the interdependence of theory, data, and application. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Si, A. (2016). Landscape Terms in Solega. In: The Traditional Ecological Knowledge of the Solega. Ethnobiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24681-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24681-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24679-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24681-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)