Skip to main content

Landscape Terms in Solega

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Traditional Ecological Knowledge of the Solega

Part of the book series: Ethnobiology ((EBL))

  • 388 Accesses

Abstract

The study of human conceptualisations of landscape, as they are encoded in the world’s languages, has the potential to provide answers to some basic linguistic questions, such as:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pocock acknowledges the limitations of his findings, pointing out that “the overall correspondence between possessed information and the elicited map is a function of graphicacy”, and that it may be unrealistic to assume equivalence between groups.

  2. 2.

    Phenology is the study of recurring plant and animal life cycle stages, or phenophases, such as leafing and flowering of plants, maturation of agricultural crops, emergence of insects, and migration of birds (USA National Phenology Network website).

  3. 3.

    To be described below.

  4. 4.

    See orrega:d.u below

  5. 5.

    See san.n.a ka:nu ka:d.u below

  6. 6.

    These terms are explained below.

  7. 7.

    BG goes on to warn about the fruit of the ge:ru tree: the flesh is edible, but the seed is poisonous.

  8. 8.

    This is a discursive strategy frequently used by BG: the representation of an event or a process by means of a mini-conversation between him and an unspecified partner, or group of partners.

  9. 9.

    BG goes on to relate the myth of how the Se:t.a ka:nu came into being.

  10. 10.

    BG goes on to tell of an incident in which he was attacked by a bear while looking for honey in an od.d.uga:ḍu.

  11. 11.

    BG goes on to tell the story of the wife of an acquaintance who was trampled to death by an elephant while collecting yams in a flatland forest .

References

  1. Si A. Biology in language documentation. Lang Doc Conserv. 2011;5:169–86.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kitchin R. Cognitive maps: what are they and why study them? J Environ Psychol. 1994;14:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burenhult N, Levinson S. Language and landscape: a cross-linguistic perspective. Lang Sci. 2008;30(2-3):135–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mark D, Turk A, Burenhult N, Stea D. Landscape in language: an introduction. In: Mark D, Turk A, Burenhult N, Stea D, editors. Landscape in language: transdisciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2011.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson L, Hunn E, editors. Landscape ethnoecology: concepts of biotic and physical space. New York: Berghahn; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hunn E, Meilleur B. Toward a theory of landscape ethnoecological classification. In: Mann L, Hunn E, editors. Landscape ethnoecology: concepts of biotic and physical space. New York: Berghahn; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gärling T, Book A, Lindberg E. Cognitive mapping of large-scale environments: the interrelationship of action plans, acquisition, and orientation. Environ Behav. 1984;16(3):3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leutgeb S, Leutgeb J, Barnes C, Moser E, McNaughton B, Moser M-B. Independent codes for spatial and episodic memory in hippocampal neuronal ensembles. Science. 2005;309:619–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McNaughton B, Battaglia F, Jensen O, Moser E, Moser M-B. Path integration and the neural basis of the ‘cognitive map’. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:663–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pocock D. Some characteristics of mental maps: an empirical study. Trans Inst Br Geogr New Ser. 1976;1(4):493–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Linde C, Labov W. Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language. 1975;51(4):924–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burrow T, Emeneau M. A Dravidian etymological dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pawley A. Lexicalization. In: Tannen D, Alatis J, editors. Languages and linguistics: the interdependence of theory, data, and application. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Si, A. (2016). Landscape Terms in Solega. In: The Traditional Ecological Knowledge of the Solega. Ethnobiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24681-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics