Skip to main content

Standard and New Laboratory Procedures in Neurobrucellosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neurobrucellosis

Abstract

The nonspecific and protean presentation of brucellosis and what it can entail from a wide range of differential diagnosis necessitate the resort to Brucella-specific laboratory tests to help in reaching an accurate diagnosis. For this purpose, several test formats are available including culture, agglutination, ELISA, and molecular tests. Knowledge is necessary for the understanding of the usefulness and limitations of the laboratory tests for accurate interpretation of their results as correlates with the clinical stage of the disease. The simultaneous use of test combination that detects agglutinating and non-agglutinating antibodies is recommended to definitively exclude Brucella spp. infection especially in complicated, focal, or chronic presentation. As will be discussed in this chapter, the Brucella-specific laboratory tests are crucial for the diagnosis of brucellosis in humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

CNS:

Central nervous system

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

IgA:

Immunoglobulin A

IgG:

Immunoglobulin G

IgM:

Immunoglobulin M

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

(RT)-PCR:

Real-time PCR

SAT:

Serum agglutination test

References

  1. Al Dahouk S, Sprague LD, Neubauer H (2013) New developments in the diagnostic procedures for zoonotic brucellosis in humans. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 32:177–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Araj GF (2010) Update on laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 36:12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Araj GF (1997) Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, not agglutination test is the test of choice for the diagnosis of neurobrucellosis (letter). Clin Infect Dis 25:1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Araj GF, Lulu AR, Mustafa MY, Khateeb MI (1986) Evaluation of ELISA in the diagnosis of acute and chronic brucellosis in human beings. J Hyg (Lond) 97:457–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Araj GF, Lulu AR, Saadah MA, Mousa AM, Strannegard I-L, Shakir RA (1986) Rapid diagnosis of central nervous system brucellosis by ELISA. J Neuroimmunol 12:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Araj GF, Lulu AR, Khateeb MI, Saadah MA, Shakir RA (1988) ELISA versus routine tests in the diagnosis of patients with systemic and neurobrucellosis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 96:171–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Araj GF (1988) Profiles of Brucella-specific immunoglobulin G subclass in serum of patients with acute and chronic brucellosis. Serodiag Immun Other Infect Dis 2:401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Araj GF, Kaufman AF (1989) Determination by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgA to Brucella melitensis major outer membrane proteins and whole-cell heat-killed antigens in sera of patients with brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol 27:1909–1912

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Araj GF, Kattar MM (2003) Rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis using Bact/Alert continuous culture monitoring system. Abstract of the 103rd annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, 18–22 May, Abstract C-002

    Google Scholar 

  10. Araj G, Kattar M, Fattouh LG, Bajakian OK, Kobeissi SA (2005) Evaluation of the PANBIO Brucella immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for diagnosis of human brucellosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12:1334–1335

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Araj GF, Lulu AR, Khateeb MI, Haj MM (1990) Specific IgE response in patients with brucellosis. Epidemiol Infect 105:571–577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ariza J, Corredoira J, Pallares R, Vilarich PF, Rufi G, Pujol M, Gudiol F (1995) Characteristics of and risk factors for relapse of brucellosis in humans. Clin Infect Dis 20:1241–1249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baldi PC, Miguel SE, Fossati CA, Wallach JC (1996) Serologic follow-up of human brucellosis by measuring IgG antibodies to lipopolysaccharide and cytoplasmic proteins of Brucella species. Clin Infect Dis 22:446–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dean AS, Crump L, Greter H, Schelling E, Zinsstag J (2012) Global burden of human brucellosis: a systematic review of disease frequency. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6, e1865

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gazapo E, Gonzalez Lahoz J, Subiza JL, Banquero M, Jil J, de la Concha EG (1989) Changes in IgM and IgG antibody concentration in brucellosis over time: importance for diagnosis and follow-up. J Infect Dis 159:219–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldbaum FA, Rubbi CP, Wallach JC, Miguel SE, Baladi PC, Fossati CA (1992) Differentiation between active and inactive human brucellosis by measuring antiprotein humoral immune responses. J Clin Microbiol 30:604–607

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gul HC, Erdem H, Bek S (2009) Overview of neurobrucellosis: a pooled analysis of 187 cases. Int J Infect Dis 13(e):339–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guven T, Ugurlu K, Ergonul O, Celikbas AK, Gok SE, Comoglu S, Baykam N, Dokuzoguz B (2013) Neurobrucellosis: clinical and diagnostic features. Clin Infect Dis 56:1407–1412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karger A, Melzer F, Timke M, Bettin B, Kostrzewa M, Nöckler K, Hohmann A, Tomaso H, Neubauer H, Al Dahouk S (2013) Interlaboratory comparison of intact-cell matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry results for identification and differentiation of Brucella spp. J Clin Microbiol 51:3123–3126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kattar MM, Zallou PA, Araj GF, Samaha-Kfoury J, Shbaklo H, Kanj SK, Khalife S, Deeb M (2007) Development and evaluation of real-time polymerase chain reaction assays on whole blood and paraffin-embedded tissues for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 59:23–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lubani MM, Doudin KI, Araj GF, Manandhar DS, Rashid FY (1989) Neurobrucellosis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 8:79–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lulu AR, Araj GF, Khateeb MI, Mustafa MY, Yusuf AR, Fenech FF (1988) Human brucellosis in Kuwait: a prospective study of 400 cases. Q J Med 66:39–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Makis AC, Galanakis E, Hatzimichael EC, Papadopoulou ZL, Siamopoulou A, Bourantas KL (2005) Serum levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha (sIL-2Alpha) as a predictor of outcome in brucellosis. J Infect 51:206–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pellicer T, Ariza J, Fox Z, Pallares R, Gudiol F (1988) Specific antibodies during relapse of human brucellosis. J Infect Dis 157:918–924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shakir RA, Al-Din ASN, Araj GF, Lulu AR, Mousa AR, Saadah MA (1987) Clinical categories of neurobrucellosis: a report on 19 cases. Brain 110:213–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sohrabi M, Mohabati MA, Khoramalbadi N, Hosseini DR, Behmanesh M (2014) Efficient diagnosis and treatment follow-up of human Brucellosis by a novel quantitative TaqMan real-time PCR assay: a human clinical survey. J Clin Microbiol 52:4239–4243

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Solera J, Martinez-Alfaro E, Espinosa A, Castillejos ML, Geijo P, Rodriguez-Zapata M (1998) Multivariate model for predicting relapse in human brucellosis. J Infect 36:85–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Y, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Bai L, Zhao Y, Liu C, Ma A, Hui Yu H (2014) Polymerase chain reaction–based assays for the diagnosis of human brucellosis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 13:31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yagupsky P (1999) Detection of Brucellae in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 37:3437–3442

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Young EJ (2010) Brucella species. In: Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R (eds) Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 2921–2925

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yu WL, Nielsen K (2010) Review of detection of Brucella spp. by polymerase chain reaction. Croat Med J 51:306–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George F. Araj PhD, D(ABMM), FAAM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Araj, G.F. (2016). Standard and New Laboratory Procedures in Neurobrucellosis. In: Turgut, M., Haddad, F., de Divitiis, O. (eds) Neurobrucellosis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24639-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24639-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24637-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24639-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics