Abstract
Group recommender systems have become systems of great interest in the CBR community. In previous papers we have described and validated a social recommendation model that solves different group recommendation challenges using knowledge from social networks. In this paper we have run across two identified limitations of our model, unprofiled users and “hierarchical relations” within a group, and have proposed and validated CBR solutions for them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
\(p_u\) represents user u’s predominant behavior according to her/his TKI evaluation [22]. It fits within a range of (0,1], 0 being the reflection of a very cooperative person and 1 the reflection of a very assertive one. This value is computed through a compulsory personality test in HappyMovie as detailed in [17].
- 2.
This factor fits within a range of (0,1], 0 being the reflection of a person someone is not close to and 1 the reflection of a person someone is really close to.
- 3.
There are several techniques for individual preferences aggregation [12], being least misery (where the minimum is taken), most pleasure (where the maximum is taken) and average satisfaction (where the average is taken) the most common ones.
- 4.
That is: users’ personality (\(p_u\)) and individual preferences (\(r_{u,i}\)) that are obtained through tests in HappyMovie and users’ trust with each other (\(t_{u,u'}\)) that is automatically computed through user’s personal information stored in Facebook profiles (see [17] for HappyMovie’s functionality details).
- 5.
This is done for obvious reasons: (1) user \(u'\), inscribing in the group the unprofiled user u, is not able to provide the system with concrete values representing user’s u personality and preferences. (2) We believe it will not be adequate or practical/possible to ask at this point to user u to start answering the needed tests.
- 6.
These ranges could be of course extended and have been selected as representations of the main stages of life.
- 7.
We have empirically assigned a value of \(\pm 1\) to \(\alpha \) in order to have a moderate impact of the dominance factor.
References
Baccigalupo, C., Plaza, E.: Case-based sequential ordering of songs for playlist recommendation. In: Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Göker, M.H., Güvenir, H.A. (eds.) ECCBR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4106, pp. 286–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Bridge, D., Göker, M.H., McGinty, L., Smyth, B.: Case-based recommender systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 20(3), 315–320 (2006)
Christakis, N.A., Fowler, J.H.: Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. CoRR (2011)
Dong, R., Schaal, M., O’Mahony, M.P., McCarthy, K., Smyth, B.: Opinionated product recommendation. In: Delany, S.J., Ontañón, S. (eds.) ICCBR 2013. LNCS, vol. 7969, pp. 44–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Dowding, K.M.: Power. Concepts in the Social Sciences. Open University Press, Buckingham (1996)
French, J.R.P., Raven, B.: The Bases of Social Power. In: Research and Theory on Group Dynamcis, New York, pp. 607–623 (1959)
Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K.: Predicting tie strength with social media. In: CHI 2009, pp. 211–220. ACM, New York (2009)
Greiner, L.E., Schein, V.E.: Power and Organization Development: Mobilizing Power to Implement Change. Addison-Wesley OD Series. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1988)
Herlocker, J.L.: Understanding and improving automated collaborative filtering systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota (2000)
Leavitt, H.: Managerial Psychology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1972)
Lorenzi, F., Ricci, F.: Case-based recommender systems: a unifying view. In: Mobasher, B., Anand, S.S. (eds.) ITWP 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3169, pp. 89–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Masthoff, J.: Group modeling: selecting a sequence of television items to suit a group of viewers. User Model. User-Adap. Interact. 14(1), 37–85 (2004)
Masthoff, J., Gatt, A.: In pursuit of satisfaction and the prevention of embarrassment: affective state in group recommender systems. User Model. User-Adap. Interact. 16(3–4), 281–319 (2006)
Quijano-Sánchez, L., Bridge, D., Díaz-Agudo, B., Recio-García, J.A.: Case-based aggregation of preferences for group recommenders. In: Agudo, B.D., Watson, I. (eds.) ICCBR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7466, pp. 327–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Quijano-Sánchez, L., Bridge, D., Díaz-Agudo, B., Recio-García, J.A.: A case-based solution to the cold-start problem in group recommenders. In: Agudo, B.D., Watson, I. (eds.) ICCBR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7466, pp. 342–356. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Quijano-Sánchez, L., Recio-García, J.A., Díaz-Agudo, B.: An architecture for developing group recommender systems enhanced by social elements. Appl. Intell. 40(4), 732–748 (2014)
Quijano-Sánchez, L., Recio-García, J.A., Díaz-Agudo, B.: Development of a group recommender application in a social network. Knowl.-Based Syst. 71, 72–85 (2014). Special Issue on Knowledge-Bases for Cognitive Infocommmunications, KBS
Quijano-Sánchez, L., Recio-García, J.A., Díaz-Agudo, B., Jiménez-Díaz, G.: Social factors in group recommender systems. ACM TIST 4(1), 8 (2013)
Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B.: Introduction to recommender systems handbook. In: Ricci, F., et al. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 1–35. Springer, New York (2011)
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F.: Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambirdge University Press, New York (2001)
SocialPhobiaWorld. Behaving differently around different people/groups (2013). http://www.socialphobiaworld.com/behaving-differently-around-different-people-groups-57798/
Thomas, K.W., Kilmann, R.H.: Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Xicom, Tuxedo (1974)
Turniansky, B., Hare, A.P.: Individuals and Groups in Organizations. SAGE Publications, London (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Quijano-Sánchez, L., Recio-García, J.A., Díaz-Agudo, B. (2015). Modelling Hierarchical Relationships in Group Recommender Systems. In: Hüllermeier, E., Minor, M. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9343. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24586-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24586-7_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24585-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24586-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)