Navigational Information Exchange and Negotiation System

  • Zbigniew PietrzykowskiEmail author
  • Jacek Skorupski
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 531)


The article addresses issues of the automation of communication processes in maritime and air transport, in particular in sea and airspace navigation. The communication process refers to transmitting information between the sender and the receiver, which comprises information exchange as well as negotiations resulting from divergent objectives of the process participants. The authors, presenting the current state and concepts of communication automation, indicate similarities and differences. The concept of a joint automated maritime and air communication platform is considered.


Communication Maritime navigation Air navigation 


  1. 1.
    Bone, R.S., Long, K.M.: Flight Crew and Air Traffic Controller Interactions when Conducting Interval Management Utilizing Voice and Controller Pilot Data Link Communications, MITRE Technical Report 130300, Center for Advanced Aviation System DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banaś, P.: Using the Protégé environment for building ontology for automated communication system at sea. Sci. Pap. Marit. Univ. Szczecin 30, 12–17 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dopping-Hepenstal, L.: Autonomy in the Air, International Navigational Conference 2015, Manchester (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    EC Communication, Communication from the Commission providing guidance on State aid complementary to Community funding for the launching of the motorways of the sea (2008/C 317/08) (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    EC Communication 538 final, A common information sharing environment for the EU maritime domain (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fanshawe, J.: The Development of a UK Regulatory Framework for Marine Autonomous Systems Drawing on Recent Practical Operational Experience and MAS Stakeholder Community Consensus, International Navigational Conference 2015, Manchester (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ICAO 2001. Aeronautical Telecommunications, Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Ed. 6Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kocot, B.: Systemy komunikacyjne na potrzeby zarządzania ogólnym ruchem lotniczym w polskiej przestrzeni powietrznej. Część II - kierunki rozwoju, Przegląd Telekomunikacyjny 5, 14–22 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kopacz, Z., Morgaś, W., Urbański, J.: Information of Maritime Navigation. Its Kinds, Compon. Use, Eur. J. Navig. 2(3), 53–60 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    IMO, Standard Marine Communication Phrases (English-Polish edition), Maritime University of Szczecin, Szczecin (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    IMO, Sub-Committee on Safety of Navigation, NAV 59/INF.2, Development of an e-Navigation Strategy Implementation Plan, Report on research project in the field of e-navigation, Submitted by PolandGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Motorways & Electronic Navigation by Intelligence at Sea MONALISA.
  13. 13.
    Pietrzykowski, Z., et al.: Exchange and interpretation of messages in ships communication and cooperation system. In: Mikulski, J. (ed.), Advanced in Transport Systems Telematics. Publisher Jacek Skalmierski Computer Studio, Katowice 2006, pp. 313–320 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pietrzykowski, Z., et al.: Automation of message interchange process in maritime transport, monograph international recent issues about ECDIS, e-Navigation and safety at sea. In: Weintrit, A. (ed.) Advances in Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation. CRC Press/Balkema, pp. 119–124 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pietrzykowski, Z., et al.: Information exchange automation in maritime transport. Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 8(2), 189–193 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pietrzykowski, Z., Borkowski, P., Wołejsza, P.: Marine integrated navigational decision support system. In: Mikulski, J. (ed.) TST 2012. CCIS, vol. 329, pp. 284–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scarlatti, D.: Identification of Technology and Services Options, Programme SWIM-SUIT, Doc. E366-02-05692-NOTE (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shortle, J., Zhang, Y.: Safety comparison of centralized and distributed aircraft separation assurance concepts. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 63, 1–11 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    SESAR. WP 14 - SWIM Technical Architecture, DoW v.4 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siergiejczyk, M.: Współczesne systemy wymiany danych w ruchu lotniczym - modele i metody: Skorupski J. (red.): Współczesne problemy inżynierii ruchu lotniczego - modele i metody, pp. 103–124. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of NavigationMaritime University of SzczecinSzczecinPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of TransportWarsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations