Skip to main content

The Impact of Docking Pose Generation Error on the Prediction of Binding Affinity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 8623))

Abstract

Docking is a computational technique that predicts the preferred conformation and binding affinity of a ligand molecule as bound to a protein pocket. It is often employed to identify a molecule that binds tightly to the target, so that a small concentration of the molecule is sufficient to modulate its biochemical function. The use of non-parametric machine learning, a data-driven approach that circumvents the need of modeling assumptions, has recently been shown to introduce a large improvement in the accuracy of docking scoring. However, the impact of pose generation error on binding affinity prediction is still to be investigated.

Here we show that the impact of pose generation is generally limited to a small decline in the accuracy of scoring. These machine-learning scoring functions retained the highest performance on PDBbind v2007 core set in this common scenario where one has to predict the binding affinity of docked poses instead of that of co-crystallized poses (e.g. drug lead optimization). Nevertheless, we observed that these functions do not perform so well at predicting the near-native pose of a ligand. This suggests that having different scoring functions for different problems is a better approach than using the same scoring function for all problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballester, P.J., et al.: Does a More Precise Chemical Description of Protein-Ligand Complexes Lead to More Accurate Prediction of Binding Affinity? J. Chem. Inf. Model. 54(3), 944–955 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballester, P.J., et al.: Hierarchical virtual screening for the discovery of new molecular scaffolds in antibacterial hit identification. J. R. Soc. Interface. 9(77), 3196–3207 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ballester, P.J.: Machine learning scoring functions based on random forest and support vector regression. In: Shibuya, T., Kashima, H., Sese, J., Ahmad, S. (eds.) PRIB 2012. LNCS, vol. 7632, pp. 14–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballester, P.J., Mitchell, J.B.O.: A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking. Bioinformatics 26(9), 1169–1175 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ballester, P.J., Mitchell, J.B.O.: Comments on “leave-cluster-out cross-validation is appropriate for scoring functions derived from diverse protein data sets”: significance for the validation of scoring functions. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51(8), 1739–1741 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Breiman, L.: Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng, T., et al.: Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on a Diverse Test Set. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49(4), 1079–1093 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, H., et al.: istar: A Web Platform for Large-Scale Protein-Ligand Docking. PLoS One 9(1), e85678 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li, H., et al.: iview: an interactive WebGL visualizer for protein-ligand complex. BMC Bioinformatics 15(1), 56 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Morris, G.M., et al.: AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 30(16), 2785–2791 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Morris, G.M., et al.: Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 19(14), 1639–1662 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Trott, O., Olson, A.J.: AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31(2), 455–461 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, H., Leung, KS., Wong, MH., Ballester, P.J. (2015). The Impact of Docking Pose Generation Error on the Prediction of Binding Affinity. In: DI Serio, C., Liò, P., Nonis, A., Tagliaferri, R. (eds) Computational Intelligence Methods for Bioinformatics and Biostatistics. CIBB 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8623. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24462-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24462-4_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24461-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24462-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics