Abstract
The responses of the students who participated in Research Study 1—Levels, described in Chap. 3, were categorized as absent general knowledge of the learning process when they were blank, irrelevant, and incoherent. Of the total amount of responses provided by these students, 19 % were categorized as responses indicating absent general knowledge of the learning process. Nine percent of all responses were blank. This raises the question of why students would leave a question open. First, if one does not know how to react to a question, then one is likely to leave it open because one cannot come up with a reaction. This seems particularly true regarding open-ended questions, where someone needs to express his or her thoughts in his or her own words and which is considered to be more difficult than ticking off a box or recognizing a specific response. Another possibility is that one has skipped over a tough question at first, to have some extra time to think it over later on, and then forget all about it. Finally, open-ended questions can be left open when one over-thinks the question resulting in doubting oneself. That is, when a question is considered to be tough and accordingly someone thinks it over too much, it may become impossible to contrive a response.
“A mistake is an event that has not yet been fully turned to your advantage.”
Edwin Land
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atchity, K. J. (Ed.). (1996). The classical Greek reader. New York: Henry Holt.
Bellack, A., Kliebard, H., Hyman, R., & Smith, F. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, England: Heinemann.
Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Keith, M. (1999). Raven-two: Poe’s “The Raven” rearranged into a Y2K-scare satire. Retrieved from http://www.cadaeic.net
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, OH: Ablex.
Morin, A. (2003). Inner speech and conscious experience: Talking to ourselves is important in developing a sense of self. Science & Consciousness Review, 4, 1–6.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational psychology. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Yates, F. A. (1966). The art of memory. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Velzen, J. (2016). Lucy: How to Go from Learning Situations to Learning Experiences. In: Metacognitive Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24433-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24433-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24431-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24433-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)