The Evolution of Humans and Technology Part 2: Technology

  • John N. A. Brown
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

In this chapter we will examine the evolution of tool use. There are three specific ideas that I hope to introduce here. The first is that our tools evolve in parallel to ourselves, each adapting to changes in the other and to social and environmental pressures. Tools are invented and improved by these pressures, and the same pressures move some tools into prominence and others into obsolescence.

We will again discuss Dynamic Environmental Focus (DEF), and how it may have enabled us to use group dynamics to survive in a hostile environment that would have killed more individualistic animals. DEF also plays an unconscious part in our adoption and adaptation of tools. Specifically, in order to become truly useful, a tool must allow the user to shift their attention without accidentally endangering themselves and those around them.

Because evolution is a slow and unconscious process, we are often unaware of the qualities that make the tools we use good or bad – instead we adapt our behaviors to suit them as though they were one of the implacable forces of nature to which we had been adapting for millions of years before we started building tools (
Fig. 5.1

We tend to forget that our common tools were ever uncommon, and that we ever had to adapt to them. The English word “Hello” used to be synonymous with “Hey”, just like it is in German, and was considered a rude way to answer the phone. Alexandre Graham Bell preferred the phrase: “Ahoy-hoy”

). We feel an unspoken pressure to preserve the tools and tool-based behaviours of our ancestors. I call this Cross-Generational Habit. I will spend a little time discussing it in the third section of this chapter.

Before we get to those ideas though, in order to truly understand tool use, we have to look backwards a little ways.

References

  1. 1.
    Ottoni EB (2015) Tool use traditions in nonhuman primates: the case of tufted capuchin monkeys. Hum Ethol Bull 30(1):22–40Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burling R (2005) The talking ape: how language evolved. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leakey LSB, Tobias PV, Napier JR (1964) A new species of the genus Homo from Olduvai Gorge. Nature 202:7–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harmand S, Lewis JE, Feibel CS, Lepre CJ, Prat S, Lenoble A, Boës X, Quinn RL, Brenet M, Arroyo A, Taylor N, Clément S, Daver G, Brugal J-P, Leakey L, Mortlock RA, Wright JD, Lokorodi S, Kirwa C, Kent DV, Roche H (2015) 3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya. Nature 521(7552):310–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chesterton GK (1939) Orthodoxy. Sheed & Ward, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • John N. A. Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Informatics SystemsAlpen-Adria Universität KlagenfurtKlagenfurtAustria

Personalised recommendations