Stop Your Mouse from Twisting Your Arm

  • John N. A. Brown
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

You’ve heard the story of the frog in boiling water, right? This is the common fable of how a frog dropped into boiling water will immediately leap out again, but a frog placed in water that warms gradually to a boil will stay complacent until it is too late.

I don’t know how frogs actually respond to such stimuli, but I do know that humans ignore some deadly threats because they don’t seem immediately threatening. We see this reflected in public policy about distracted driving, smoking, mandatory vaccination, the cost/benefit balance of insurance, and action on climate change. Immediate needs tend to outweigh long-term needs, even when the immediate need is more of a desire and the long-term need is essential for continued existence.

In this chapter, we will take a look at the computer mouse, a tool that hurts most of the people who use it. Now, it doesn’t hurt everyone and, more importantly, those it does hurt are wounded slowly and additively, through what is called repetitive strain. As a result, its usefulness is more immediate than the risk of injury, even though the common injury can cause life-long pain and debilitation. This imbalance is innately ignored, and the relative time frames make it easier to ignore the problem than to respond to it – like the apocryphal frog in the warming water.

Like the frog, we won’t know we’re in trouble until it’s too late.

Keywords

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Ulnar Nerve Streaming Video Motion Capture System Computer Mouse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Perry TS, Voelcker J (1989) Of mice and menus: designing the user-friendly interface. Spectr IEEE 26(9):46–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Card SK, English WK, Burr BJ (1978) Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21:601–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown JNA (2004). A new input device: comparison to three commercially available mouses. Master’s dissertation, University of New Brunswick, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aarås A, Dainoff M, Ro O, Thoresen M (2002) Can a more neutral position of the forearm when operating a computer mouse reduce the pain level for VDU operators? Int J Ind Ergon 30(4):307–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keir PJ, Bach JM, Rempel D (1998) Effects of finger posture on carpal tunnel pressure during wrist motion. J Hand Surg 23A:1004–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keir PJ, Bach JM (1999) Effects of computer mouse design and task on carpal tunnel pressure. Ergonomics 42:1350–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loscher WN, Auer-Grumbach M, Trinka E, Ladurner G, Hartung H-P (2000) Comparison of second lumbrical and interosseus latencies with standard measures of median nerve function across the carpal tunnel: a prospective study of 450 hands. J Neurol 247(7):530–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rempel D, Bach JM, Gordon L, Levinsohn DG (1998) Effects of forearm pronation/supination on carpal tunnel pressure. J Hand Surg 23A:38–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jensen BR, Laursen B, Ratkevicius (2002) Forearm extensor muscle fatigue in young and elderly subjects induced by four hours of computer mouse work. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on human-computer interaction, 93–96, Aug 22–26, MunichGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dainoff MJ (1999) A fitt’s law comparison between two different mouse designs. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Aug 22–27, MunichGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jastrzebowski WB (1857) An outline of ergonomics, or the science of work based upon the truths drawn from the science of nature, part I. Nat Ind 29:227–231Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jastrzebowski WB (1857) An outline of ergonomics, or the science of work based upon the truths drawn from the science of nature, part II. Nat Ind 30:236–244Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jastrzebowski WB (1857) An outline of ergonomics, or the science of work based upon the truths drawn from the science of nature, part III. Nat Ind 31:244–251Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jastrzebowski WB (1857) An outline of ergonomics, or the science of work based upon the truths drawn from the science of nature, part IV. Nat Ind 32:253–258Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lipscomb HJ, Nolan J, Patterson D (2015) Musculoskeletal concerns do not justify failure to use safer sequential trigger to prevent acute nail gun injuries. Am J Ind Med 58(4):422–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brown JNA, Albert WJ, Croll J (2007) A new input device: comparison to three commercially available mouses. Ergonomics 50(2):208–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • John N. A. Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Informatics SystemsAlpen-Adria Universität KlagenfurtKlagenfurtAustria

Personalised recommendations