Advertisement

Disaster Response Logistics: Chief Findings of Fieldwork Research

  • José Holguín-VerasEmail author
  • Miguel Jaller
  • Felipe Aros-Vera
  • Johanna Amaya
  • Trilce Encarnación
  • Tricia Wachtendorf
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR)

Abstract

This chapter discuses Disaster Response Logistics in connection with the Emergency Functions conducted by relief agencies, and identifies under-studied areas where logistic research could enhance operational effectiveness. The chapter establishes the socio-technical nature of Disaster Response Logistics, and the implications for disaster mitigation, preparation, and response. It relays the chief findings of the fieldwork research conducted by the authors, which support the development of policies to enhance advance preparation and coordination of disaster response activities.

Keywords

Disaster management Disaster plans Material convergence Disaster preparedness Disaster response logistics Humanitarian logistics Emergency support functions 

References

  1. Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann WM, Hanley N, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Mourato S, Özdemiroglu E, Pearce DW (2002) Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar, NorthamptonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beardwood J, Halton JH, Hammersley JM (1959) The shortest path through many points. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 55(04):299–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard BW (2008, October 22) Guide to emergency management and related terms, definitions, concepts, acronyms, organizations, programs, guidance, executive orders & legislation. http://training.fema.gov/hiedu/docs/terms%20and%20definitions/terms%20and%20definitions.pdf
  4. Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, Lee GC, O’Rourke TD, Reinhorn AM, Shinozuka M, Tierney K, Wallace WA, von Winterfeldt D (2003) A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq Spectr 19(4):733–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Center for International Disaster Information (2014) Guidelines for giving. http://www.cidi.org/guidelines. Accessed 7 Oct 2014
  6. Daganzo C (1984) The distance traveled to visit N points with a maximum C stops per vehicle: an analytical model and an application. Transp Sci 18(4):331–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donar S. (2011b) Una Iniciativa Interagencial para Promover la Calidad y Eficiencia en las Donaciones Humanitarias en América Latina. http://www.saberdonar.info
  8. Drabek T (1996, September) The social dimensions of disaster (FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project College Course Instructor Guide). http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/completeCourses.htm
  9. Edwards P (2002) Infrastructure and modernity: force, time and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In: Misa T, Brey P, Feenberg A (eds) Modernity and technology. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Eguchi RT, Bevington J, Lin A, Goltz JD, Eguchi MT, Huynh A, Yamazaki F, Koshimura S (2012) The role of urban development patterns in mitigating the effects of tsunami run-up: an early progress report. 10th International Workshop on Remote Sensing and Disaster Management, Sendai, JapanGoogle Scholar
  11. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2008) Emergency support function annexes: introduction. http://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1825-25045-0604/emergency_support_function_annexes_introduction_2008_.pdf
  12. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2011) National Donations Management Network (NDMN). http://sandbox.aidmatrixnetwork.org/FEMA/Index.aspx. Accessed 20 Aug 2011
  13. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2015) National response framework. https://www.fema.gov/national-response-framework. Accessed 7 May 2015
  14. Fritz CE, Mathewson JH (1957) Convergent behavior: a disaster control problem. Special report for the committee on Disaster Studies. Disaster Study 9. pp 1–102Google Scholar
  15. General Accounting Office (1993, May 25) Disaster management: recent disasters demonstrate the need to improve the nation’s response strategy. Retrieved GAO/T-RDED-93-46, Testimony before the committee on Armed Services, subcommittee on Nuclear Deterrence, Arms Control and Defense Intelligence, U.S. Senate. http://archive.gao.gov/d43t14/149256.pdf
  16. Ghosh S, Huyck CK, Greene M, Gill SP, Bevington J, Svelka W, DesRoches R, Eguchi RT (2011) Crowd sourcing for rapid damage assessment: The Global Earth Observation Catastrophe Network (GEOCAN). Earthq Spectr 27(Special Issue on the 2010 Haiti Earthquake, Number S1):179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Government Accountability Office (2006) Emergency preparedness and response—some issues and challenges associated with major emergency incidents state of California. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06467t.pdf
  18. Holguín-Veras J, Jaller M (2012) Immediate resource requirements after hurricane Katrina. Nat Hazard Rev 13(2):117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holguín-Veras J, Pérez N, Ukkusuri S, Wachtendorf T, Brown B (2007) Emergency logistics issues affecting the response to Katrina: a synthesis and preliminary suggestions for improvement. Transp Res Rec 2022:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holguín-Veras J, Jaller M, Wachtendorf T (2012a) Comparative performance of alternative humanitarian logistic structures after the Port-au-Prince Earthquake: ACEs, PIEs, and CANs. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 46(10):1623–1640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holguín-Veras J, Jaller M, Wassenhove LNV, Pérez N, Wachtendorf T (2012b) On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. J Oper Manage 30:494–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holguín-Veras J, Jaller M, Taniguchi E, Aros-Vera F (2013a). The lessons from catastrophic events for post-disaster humanitarian logistic efforts: the Port Au Prince Earthquake and the Tohoku Disasters. Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Holguín-Veras J, Pérez N, Jaller M, Van Wassenhove LN, Aros-Vera F (2013b) On the appropriate objective function for post-disaster humanitarian logistics models. J Oper Manage 31(5):262–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holguín-Veras J, Jaller M, Van Wassenhove LN, Pérez N, Wachtendorf T (2014a) Material convergence: an important and understudied disaster phenomenon. Nat Hazards Rev 15(1):1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holguín-Veras J, Taniguchi E, Jaller M, Aros-Vera F, Ferreira F, Thompson RG (2014b) The Tohoku disasters: chief lessons concerning the post disaster humanitarian logistics response and policy implications. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 69(0):86–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holguín-Veras J, Amaya-Leal J, Cantillo V, Van Wassenhove LN, Aros-Vera F, Jaller M (2015). Deprivation cost functions for water: results from a contingent valuation experiment. J Oper Manage (JOM) (Under review)Google Scholar
  27. Jaller M (2011) Resource allocation problems during disasters: the cases of points of distribution planning and material convergence handling. Ph.D., Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaghan WN, Bowker GC (2001) Out of machine age?: complexity, sociotechnical systems and actor network theory. J Eng Tech Manage 18(3–4):253–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(01)00037-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kovacs G, Spens KM (2007) Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage 37(2):99–114. doi:10.1108/09600030710734820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. National Geographic (2011) Hiroshima: the next day. Pamela Caragol Wells—Caragol Wells productions in association with National Geographic Television for National Geographic ChannelsGoogle Scholar
  31. Newsweek (2002, February 18th) $75 Million of stuff. pp. 62–63Google Scholar
  32. Ontko M, Williamson S, Haselkorn MP, Kemp RB (2007) An examination of the effectiveness of lessons—learned reporting within the humanitarian sector. J Inf Technol Soc Change Spring Edition, pp 28–48Google Scholar
  33. Pearce LDR (2000). An integrated approach for community hazard, impact, risk and vulnerability analysis: HIRV. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  34. Pérez-Rodríguez N, Holguín-Veras J (2015) Inventory-allocation distribution models for postdisaster humanitarian logistics with explicit consideration of deprivation costs. Transp Sci (Articles in advance) 0(0):1–25. doi:10.1287/trsc.2014.0565Google Scholar
  35. Quarantelli EL (2006, November 15). Catastrophes are different from disasters: implications for crisis planning and managing drawn from Katrina. Understanding Katrina: perspectives from the social sciences. http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Quarantelli/. Accessed 16 Nov 2010
  36. Reuters T. (2014) Web of science. http://www.webofknowledge.com/. Accessed 26 Dec 2014
  37. Sphere Project (2011) 2011 sphere handbook: Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in disaster response. http://www.sphereproject.org/. Accessed 10 July 2011
  38. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2010) Florida POD forecast model. http://www.swf.usace.army.mil/pubdata/ppmd/EmerMgt/PDF/FLPODFORECASTMODEL.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2010
  39. Varian H (1992) Microeconomic analysis. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Wachtendorf T (2010) When push comes to shove: the framing of need in disaster relief efforts. International research committee on Disasters meeting, XVII World Congress of Sociology, International Sociological Association, Goteborg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  41. Wachtendorf T, Kendra JM, Rodriguez H, Trainor J (2006) The social impacts and consequences of the December, 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami: observations from India and Sri Lanka. Earthq Spectr 22(3):693–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wachtendorf T, Brown B, Holguin-Veras J (2013) Catastrophe characteristics and their impact on critical supply chains: problematizing material convergence and management following hurricane Katrina. J Homel Secur Emerg Manage 10(2):497–520Google Scholar
  43. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004). At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. World Population Review (2014) Population estimates 2014. Accessed 39 Dec 2104. http://worldpopulationreview.com

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Holguín-Veras
    • 1
    Email author
  • Miguel Jaller
    • 3
  • Felipe Aros-Vera
    • 2
  • Johanna Amaya
    • 1
    • 4
  • Trilce Encarnación
    • 1
  • Tricia Wachtendorf
    • 5
  1. 1.Center for Infrastructure, Transportation, and the Environment, and the VREF Center of Excellence for Sustainable Urban Freight Systems, Civil and Environmental EngineeringRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Russ College of Engineering and TechnologyOhio UniversityAthensUSA
  3. 3.Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  4. 4.Industrial EngineeringUniversidad del NorteBarranquillaColombia
  5. 5.Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, Disaster Research CenterUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations