Advertisement

The Vaccine Supply Chain Multathlon: the Reconciliation of Technology, Economy and Access to Medicines

  • Catherine DecouttereEmail author
  • Nico Vandaele
  • Stef Lemmens
  • Mauro Bernuzzi
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR)

Abstract

Many rigorous models have been developed to support the design of humanitarian supply chains. Supply chains supportive of Access to Medicines (ATM), like vaccine supply chains impose considerable additional challenges on this design process. We embed these models in a broader stakeholder based framework. This will substantially enhance the societal and human impact of the ATM supply chain service delivery. This broader base of stakeholders will deliver a balanced set of Key Performance Indicators, against which the new design options or scenarios will be evaluated. These scenarios will be the outcome of an iterative design and modelling process moderated by a group of key stakeholders. Subsequently, a multi-criteria ranking method will reveal a shortlist of championing scenarios. Finally, a group decision process will decide on the final supply chain design choice. Moreover, the acceptance and buy-in of the (re)designed supply chain will be much more evident for all stakeholders involved. The main purpose of this paper is to present a general framework for ATM supply chain design which constitutes a stakeholder’s framework encapsulating a rigorous modelling approach. We build upon our own experience within a vaccine supply chain.

Keywords

Stakeholder analysis Scenario planning Multi-criteria evaluation Key performance indicators Supply chain design Access to medicines Vaccine industry Group decision making Rotavirus Data envelopment analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the GSK Vaccines Research chair in Operations Management.

References

  1. Akao Y (1990) Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design. Productivity Press, Portland, OregonGoogle Scholar
  2. Azaron A, Brown K, Tarim S, Modarres M (2008) A multi-objective stochastic programming approach for supply chain design considering risk. Int J Product Econ 116(1):129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S (2012) Shared decision making: the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 366(9):780–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyan OD, Baykal N (2012) A knowledge based search tool for performance measures in health care systems. J Med Syst 36(1):201–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya S, Hasija S, Van Wassenhove L (2014) Designing efficient infrastructural investment and asset transfer mechanisms. Production and operations. Management 23(9):1511–1521Google Scholar
  6. Brailsford SC (2008) System dynamics: what’s in it for healthcare simulation modelers. In Simulation Conference, 2008. WSC 2008. Winter, pp 1478–1483. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  7. Brailsford SC, Lattimer V, Tarnaras P, Turnbull J (2004) Emergency and on-demand health care: modelling a large complex system. J Oper Res Soc 55(1):34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown T (2008) Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev 86(6):84Google Scholar
  9. Brown D, Burton A, Gacic-Dobo M, Karimov R, Vandelaer J, Okwo-Bele J (2011) A mid-term assessment of progress towards the immunization coverage goal of the global immunization vision and strategy (givs). BMC Public Health 11(1):806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckle P, Clarkson P, Coleman R, Ward J, Anderson J (2006) Patient safety, systems design and ergonomics. Appl Ergon 37(4):491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckle P, Clarkson P, Coleman R, Bound J, Ward J, Brown J (2010) Systems mapping workshops and their role in understanding medication errors in healthcare. Appl Ergon 41(5):645–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cardona-Valdés Y, Álvarez A, Ozdemir D (2011) A bi-objective supply chain design problem with uncertainty. Transp Res C Emer Technol 19(5):821–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarkson PJ, Buckle P, Coleman R, Stubbs D, Ward J, Jarrett J, Lane R, Bound J (2004) Design for patient safety: a review of the effectiveness of design in the uk health service. J Eng Des 15(2):123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donaldson K, Ishii K, Sheppard S (2006) Customer value chain analysis. Res Eng Design 16(4):174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elhedhli S, Merrick R (2012) Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions. Transp Res part D Transp Environ 17(5):370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elias AA, Cavana RY, Jackson LS (2002) Stakeholder analysis for R & D project management. R D Management 32(4):301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franca R, Jones E, Richards C, Carlson J (2010) Multi-objective stochastic supply chain modeling to evaluate tradeoffs between profit and quality. Int J Prod Econ 127(2):292–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman RE (2010). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Guillén G, Mele F, Bagajewicz, Espuña A, Puigjaner L (2005) Multiobjective supply chain design under uncertainty. Chem Eng Sci 60(6):1535–1553. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Guillén-Gosálbez G, Grossmann I (2009) Optimal design and planning of sustainable supply chains under uncertainty. Am Inst Chem Eng Jl 55(1):99–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamedani S, Jabalameli M, Bozorgi-Amiri A (2013) A multi-objective model for locating distribution centers in a supply chain network considering risk and inventory decisions. Manag Sci Lett 3(4):1077–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hekkert P, van Dijk M (2011) Vision in design: a guidebook for innovators. BIS. Amsterdam, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  23. Jun GT, Ward J, Morris Z, Clarkson J (2009) Health care process modelling: which method when? Int J Qual Health Care 21(3):214–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kamara L, Lydon P, Bilous J, Vandelaer J, Eggers R, Gacic-Dobo M, Meaney W, Okwo-Bele J-M (2013) Global immunization vision and strategy (givs): a mid-term analysis of progress in 50 countries. Health Policy Plan 28(1):11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lemmens S, Vandaele N, Decouttere C, Bernuzzi M (2014) Integrated supply chain network design models for vaccines: a literature review, FBE Research Report KBI 1414, KU Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin J, Barnett J (2012) Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 12(1):74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Milkman KL, Chugh D, Bazerman MH (2009) How can decision making be improved? Perspect Psychol Sci 4(4):379–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886Google Scholar
  30. Murray CJ, Frenk J (2000) A framework for assessing the performance of health systems. Bull World Health Organ 78:717–731Google Scholar
  31. Musgrove P, Creese A, Preker A, Baeza C, Anell A, Prentice T (2000) The World health report 2000: health systems: improving performance. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  32. Naimi Sadigh A, Fallah H, Nahavandi N (2013) A multi-objective supply chain model integrated with location of distribution centers and supplier selection decisions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(1–4):225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norman DA (2007) Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic books. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Olivares-Benitez E, González-Velarde J, Ríos-Mercado R (2012) A supply chain design problem with facility location and bi-objective transportation choices. TOP 20(3):729–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ortuño M, Tirado G, Vitoriano B (2011) A lexicographical goal programming based decision support system for logistics of humanitarian aid. TOP 19(2):464–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rajabalipour Cheshmehgaz H, Desa M, Wibowo A (2013) A flexible three-level logistics network design considering cost and time criteria with multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. J Intell Manuf 24(2):277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rechel B, Wright S, Barlow J, McKee M (2010) Hospital capacity planning: from measuring stocks to modelling flows. Bull World Health Organ 88:632–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rouck SD, Jacobs A, Leys M (2008) A methodology for shifting the focus of e-health support design onto user needs: a case in the homecare field. Int J Med Inform 77(9):589–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Samii A-B, Pibernik R, Yadav P, Vereecke A (2012) Reservation and allocation policies for influenza vaccines. Eur J Oper Res 222:495–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanders L (2008) On modeling: an evolving map of design practice and design research. Interactions 15(6):13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shah N (2004) Pharmaceutical supply chains: key issues and strategies for optimisation. Comput Chem Eng 28(6–7):929–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shah N (2005) Process industry supply chains: advances and challenges. Comput Chem Eng 29(6):1225–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Solaimani S, Guldemond N, Bouwman H (2013) Dynamic stakeholder interaction analysis: innovative smart living design cases. Electronic Markets, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  44. Taboada M, Cabrera E, Iglesias ML, Epelde F, Luque E (2011) An agent-based decision support system for hospitals emergency departments. Procedia Comput Sci 4:1870–1879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thakur R, Hsu SH, Fontenot G (2012) Innovation in healthcare: issues and future trends. J Bus Res 65(4):562–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vandaele NJ, Decouttere CJ (2013) Sustainable r & d portfolio assessment. Decis Support Syst 54(4):1521–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vandaele N, Nieuwenhuyse IV, Cupers S (2003) Optimal grouping for a nuclear magnetic resonance scanner by means of an open queueing model. Eur J Oper Res 151(1):181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vitoriano B, Ortuño M, Tirado G (2009) HADS, a goal programming-based humanitarian aid distribution system. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 16(1–2):55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vitoriano B, Ortuño M, Tirado G, Montero J (2011) A multi-criteria optimization model for humanitarian aid distribution. J Global Optim 51(2):189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang F, Lai X, Shi N (2011) A multi-objective optimization for green supply chain network design. Decis Support Syst 51(2):262–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang SA, Hyde TB, Mounier-Jack S, Brenzel L, Favin M, Gordon WS, Shearer JC, Mantel CF, Arora N, Durrheim D (2013) New vaccine introductions: assessing the impact and the opportunities for immunization and health systems strengthening. Vaccine 31(2):B122–B128. (Decade of Vaccines)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. World Health Organization (2013) Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011–2020. WHO; 2013. http://www.who.int/immunization/global
  53. Yadav P, Stapleton O, Van Wassenhove L (2013) Learning from coca-cola. Stanf Soc Innov Rev 11(1):51–55Google Scholar
  54. You F, Grossmann I (2008) Design of Responsive supply chains under demand uncertainty. Comput Chem Eng 32(12):3090–3111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. You F, Grossmann I (2011) Balancing responsiveness and economics in process supply chain design with multi-echelon stochastic inventory. Am Inst Chem Eng J 57(1):178–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Decouttere
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nico Vandaele
    • 1
  • Stef Lemmens
    • 1
  • Mauro Bernuzzi
    • 2
  1. 1.Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.GSK VaccinesWavreBelgium

Personalised recommendations