Advertisement

Primary INBONE Total Ankle Systems

  • Ryan T. Scott
  • Christopher F. Hyer
  • Gregory C. Berlet
Chapter

Abstract

Treatment of degenerative joint disease of the ankle has experienced a renaissance in the past decade as total ankle replacement has become a predictable alternative to ankle fusion for end-stage disease. There are several total ankle replacement systems on the market including the INBONE Total Ankle System that was US Food and Drug Administration 510-k cleared for use in 2005 and consists of a saddle-shaped, fixed-bearing, two-component design with the polyethylene-bearing surface locked into the tibial baseplate. The INBONE II Total Ankle System is an evolution of the original INBONE Total Ankle System design. This new system retains several important design characteristics of the original INBONE Total Ankle System design, including the modular tibial stems, thicker polyethylene bearings, and intramedullary guidance. In conclusion, the INBONE I and INBONE II Total Ankle Systems offer the advantages of a robust technique with advanced instrumentation when managing the arthritic ankle.

Keywords

Total ankle arthroplasty INBONE Ankle replacement 

References

  1. 1.
    Easley ME, Adams Jr SB, Hembree WC, DeOrio JK. Results of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(15):1455–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jastifer JR, Coughlin MJ. Long-term follow-up of mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty in the United States. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(2):143–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thomas RH, Daniels TR. Ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(5):923–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calderale PM, Garro A, Barbiero R, Fasolio G, Pipino F. Biomechanical design of the total ankle prosthesis. Eng Med. 1983;12(2):69–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brodsky JW, Polo FE, Coleman SC, Bruck N. Changes in gait following the Scandinavian total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(20):1890–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gill LH. Challenges in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(4):195–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kofoed H. Concept and use of the Scandinavian total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Spec. 2009;2(2):89–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cracchiolo III A, Deorio JK. Design features of current total ankle replacements: implants and instrumentation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(9):530–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeVries JG, Scott RT, Berlet GC, Hyer CF, Lee TH, DeOrio JK. Agility to INBONE: anterior and posterior approaches to the difficult revision total ankle replacement. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(1):81–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reiley MA. INBONE total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Spec. 2008;1(5):305–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abicht BP, Roukis TS. The INBONE II total ankle system. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(1):47–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scott RT, Witt BL, Hyer CF. Design comparison of the INBONE I versus INBONE II total ankle system. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013;6(2):137–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DeMill SL, McAlister JE, Hyer CF, Berlet GC. Quantification of subtalar posterior facet involvement during intramedullary guidance of total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Devries JG, Berlet GC, Lee TH, Hyer CF, Deorio JK. Revision total ankle replacement: an early look at agility to INBONE. Foot Ankle Spec. 2011;4(4):235–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bibbo C. Posterior approach for total ankle arthroplasty. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(1):132–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adams Jr SB, Demetracopoulos CA, Queen RM, Easley ME, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA. Early to mid-term results of fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty with a modular intramedullary tibial component. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(23):1983–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lewis JS, Green CL, Adams Jr SB, Easley ME, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA. Comparison of first- and second-generation fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty using a modular intramedullary tibial component. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(8):881–90. doi: 10.1177/1071100715576568.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hsu AR, Haddad SL. Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of intramedullary-fixation total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(3):194–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan T. Scott
    • 1
  • Christopher F. Hyer
    • 2
    • 3
  • Gregory C. Berlet
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of OrthopedicsThe CORE InstitutePhoenixUSA
  2. 2.Orthopedic Foot and Ankle CenterWestervilleUSA
  3. 3.Grant Medical Center Podiatric Medicine and Surgical ResidencyColumbusUSA
  4. 4.Polaris Surgery CenterWestervilleUSA

Personalised recommendations