Skip to main content

Primary INBONE Total Ankle Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement

Abstract

Treatment of degenerative joint disease of the ankle has experienced a renaissance in the past decade as total ankle replacement has become a predictable alternative to ankle fusion for end-stage disease. There are several total ankle replacement systems on the market including the INBONE Total Ankle System that was US Food and Drug Administration 510-k cleared for use in 2005 and consists of a saddle-shaped, fixed-bearing, two-component design with the polyethylene-bearing surface locked into the tibial baseplate. The INBONE II Total Ankle System is an evolution of the original INBONE Total Ankle System design. This new system retains several important design characteristics of the original INBONE Total Ankle System design, including the modular tibial stems, thicker polyethylene bearings, and intramedullary guidance. In conclusion, the INBONE I and INBONE II Total Ankle Systems offer the advantages of a robust technique with advanced instrumentation when managing the arthritic ankle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Easley ME, Adams Jr SB, Hembree WC, DeOrio JK. Results of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(15):1455–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jastifer JR, Coughlin MJ. Long-term follow-up of mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty in the United States. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(2):143–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas RH, Daniels TR. Ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(5):923–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calderale PM, Garro A, Barbiero R, Fasolio G, Pipino F. Biomechanical design of the total ankle prosthesis. Eng Med. 1983;12(2):69–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brodsky JW, Polo FE, Coleman SC, Bruck N. Changes in gait following the Scandinavian total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(20):1890–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gill LH. Challenges in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(4):195–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kofoed H. Concept and use of the Scandinavian total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Spec. 2009;2(2):89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cracchiolo III A, Deorio JK. Design features of current total ankle replacements: implants and instrumentation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(9):530–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DeVries JG, Scott RT, Berlet GC, Hyer CF, Lee TH, DeOrio JK. Agility to INBONE: anterior and posterior approaches to the difficult revision total ankle replacement. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(1):81–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reiley MA. INBONE total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Spec. 2008;1(5):305–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abicht BP, Roukis TS. The INBONE II total ankle system. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(1):47–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Scott RT, Witt BL, Hyer CF. Design comparison of the INBONE I versus INBONE II total ankle system. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013;6(2):137–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DeMill SL, McAlister JE, Hyer CF, Berlet GC. Quantification of subtalar posterior facet involvement during intramedullary guidance of total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Devries JG, Berlet GC, Lee TH, Hyer CF, Deorio JK. Revision total ankle replacement: an early look at agility to INBONE. Foot Ankle Spec. 2011;4(4):235–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bibbo C. Posterior approach for total ankle arthroplasty. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(1):132–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Adams Jr SB, Demetracopoulos CA, Queen RM, Easley ME, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA. Early to mid-term results of fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty with a modular intramedullary tibial component. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(23):1983–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lewis JS, Green CL, Adams Jr SB, Easley ME, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA. Comparison of first- and second-generation fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty using a modular intramedullary tibial component. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(8):881–90. doi:10.1177/1071100715576568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsu AR, Haddad SL. Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of intramedullary-fixation total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(3):194–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan T. Scott DPM, FACFAS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scott, R.T., Hyer, C.F., Berlet, G.C. (2016). Primary INBONE Total Ankle Systems. In: Roukis, T., et al. Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24415-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24415-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24413-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24415-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics