Skip to main content

Digital Forensics Laboratory Process Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems: Development, Applications, Education (SIGSAND/PLAIS 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 232))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 540 Accesses

Abstract

The paper describes the processes of forensic laboratory and its process-oriented problems. The main goal of this paper is to develop a new process framework for managing and optimization of the operation of the digital forensics laboratory. Based on the interviews with managers and experts the new process model is proposed and a compared with widely used model of Beebe and Clark. SIPOC method and flowchart diagrams are used for visualization of the new process model. Each phase of the forensics laboratory process is elaborated into separate flowchart diagrams. New proposed process framework includes activities connected to business aspect of the process and interaction with the customer not included in Beebe’s and Clark’s model. The new proposed model can be used as an input for a more detailed general process map of digital forensic laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 60.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dale, W.M., Becker, W.S.: A case study of forensic scientist turnover. Forensic Sci. Commun. 6(3) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Palmer, G.: A road map for digital forensics research-report from the first Digital Forensics Research Workshop (DFRWS), Utica, NY (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beebe, N.L., Clark, J.G.: A hierarchical, objectives-based framework for the digital investigations process. Digit. Investig. 2, 147–167 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Speaker, P.J.: Key performance indicators and managerial analysis for forensic laboratories. Forensic Sci. Policy Manag. 1, 32–42 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beckett, J., Slay, J.: Digital forensics: validation and verification in a dynamic work environment. In: 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 2007), p. 266a. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Palmer, G.L.: Forensic analysis in the digital world. Int. J. Digit. Evid. 1, 1–6 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carrier, B., Spafford, E.H.: Getting physical with the digital investigation process. Int. J. Digit. Evid. 2, 1–20 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baryamureeba, V., Tushabe, F.: The enhanced digital investigation process model. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Digital Forensic Research Workshop (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Project Management Institute: A Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge, Fourth edn. Global Standard, Newtown Square, PA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Investigation ECS.: A Guide for First Responders. US Department of Justice NCJ 187736, Washington DC (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reith, M., Carr, C., Gunsch, G.: An examination of digital forensic models. Int. J. Digit. Evid. 1, 1–12 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mohay, G.M.: Computer and intrusion forensics. Artech House, Norwood (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prosise, C., Mandia, K., Pepe, M.: Incident response & computer forensics. McGraw-Hill/Osborne, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nelson, B., Phillips, A., Enfinger, F., Stewart, C.: Computer Forensics and Investigations. Premier Press, Portland (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gitlow, H.S., Levine, D.M.: Six Sigma for Green Belts and Champions: Foundations, DMAIC, Tools, Cases, and Certification. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Saddle River (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Damelio, R.: The Basics of Process Mapping. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hykš, O., Koliš, K.: Development of the digital forensic s laboratory management system using ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 17025, pp. 87–94 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wüllenweber, K., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T., König, W.: The impact of process standardization on business process outsourcing success. Inf. Syst. Front. 10, 211–224 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The article was prepared with the help of a grant from the VŠE Internal Grant Agency (IG409024 – “Innovation management system, digital forensics labs”). The authors would like to thank Marian Svetlik from RAC for the helpful comments while developing this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaromír Veber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hájek, J., Hykš, O., Koliš, K., Veber, J. (2015). Digital Forensics Laboratory Process Model. In: Wrycza, S. (eds) Information Systems: Development, Applications, Education. SIGSAND/PLAIS 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 232. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24366-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24366-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24365-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24366-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics