Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Technology in the Oil Industry

Abstract

The environmental concerns associated with hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas production are outlined. Most environmental concerns are not specific to hydraulic fracturing but are common to all oil and gas activity. Hydraulic fracturing has increased oil and gas activity, however, and thus exacerbated these concerns. The most likely environmental issues include spills and leaks of hydrocarbons or formation waters in the near subsurface and during management at the surface. There are also concerns about the availability of water for hydraulic fracturing in water scarce areas and this could be partially offset by increased reuse of produced water. Increased reuse would simultaneously reduce the potential for seismic activity due to disposal of produced waters through deep well injection. Effective management of these environmental concerns is necessary to achieve the full benefits of hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas including greater energy independence and increased supplies of relatively low carbon footprint natural gas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adair SK, Pearson BR, Monast J, Vengosh A (2011) Considering shale gas extraction in North Carolina: lessons from other states. Duke Environ Law Policy Forum 22:257

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen DT, Torres VM, Thomas J, Sullivan DW, Harrison M, Hendler A, Herndon SC, Kolb CE, Fraser MP, Hill AD (2013) Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(44):17768–17773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. ANL ANL (2011) Drilling waste management information system. Fact sheet- Step 1: separation of mud from cuttings. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne

    Google Scholar 

  4. ANL ANL (2011) Drilling waste management system. Fact sheet- Beneficial reuse of drilling waste. From http://web.ead.anl.gov/dwm/techdesc/reuse/

  5. Armendariz A (2009) Emissions from natural gas production in the Barnett Shale and opportunities for cost-effective improvements. From http://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/9235_Barnett_Shale_Report.pdf

  6. Ausick P (2012) Chesapeake gas well blow-out in Wyoming leads to evacuations (CHK, CEO, HAL). From http://247wallst.com/2012/04/26/chesapeake-gas-well-blow-out-in-wyoming-leads-to-evacuations-chk-ceo-hal/

  7. Bamberger M, Oswald RE (2012) Impacts of gas drilling on human and animal health. New Solut 22(1):51–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beauduy T (2011) Hearing on Shale gas production and water resources in the Eastern United States, subcommittee on water and power Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources United States Senate, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bené P, Harden B, Griffin SW, Nicot J-P (2007) Northern Trinity/Woodbine aquifer groundwater availability model: assessment of groundwater use in the northern Trinity aquifer due to urban growth and Barnett Shale development: Texas Water Development Board. TWDB Contract 0604830613:50

    Google Scholar 

  10. Benko KL, Drewes JE (2008) Produced water in the Western United States: geographical distribution, occurrence, and composition. Environ Eng Sci 25(2):239–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Boschee P (2014) Produced and flowback water recycling and reuse: economics, limitations, and technology. Oil Gas Facil 3(01):16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Breen KJ, Revesz K, Baldassare FJ, McAuley SD (2007) Natural gases in ground water near Tioga Junction, Tioga County, North-Central Pennsylvania- occurrence and use of isotopes to determine origins, 2005. U. S. Geological Survey, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brosselin P, Rudant J, Orsi L, Leverger G, Baruchel A, Bertrand Y, Nelken B, Robert A, Michel G, Margueritte G (2009) Acute childhood leukaemia and residence next to petrol stations and automotive repair garages: the ESCALE study (SFCE). Occup Environ Med 66(9):598–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Casselman B (2009) Temblors rattle Texas town. Wall Street J:12

    Google Scholar 

  15. CERES (2014) Fracking is depleting water supplies in America’s driest areas. From http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/feb/05/fracking-water-america-drought-oil-gas

  16. Clark C, Burnham A, Harto C, Horner R (2012) Hydraulic fracturing and shale gas production: technology, impacts, and policy. Argonne Nat Lab 10:2012

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clarke CR, Sun-Gazette W (2012) Police: spill at gas well site may have been vandalism. Williamsport Sun-Gazette, Williamsport

    Google Scholar 

  18. Colborn T, Kwiatkowski C, Schultz K, Bachran M (2011) Natural gas operations from a public health perspective. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 17(5):1039–1056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Coleman DD, Liu C-L, Riley KM (1988) Microbial methane in the shallow Paleozoic sediments and glacial deposits of Illinois, USA. Chem Geol 71(1):23–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Considine TR, Watson NC, Martin J (2012) Environmental impacts during Marcellus shale gas drilling: causes, impacts, and remedies. Report 2012–1 Shale Resources and Society Institute, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cooley H, Donnelly K, Ross N, Luu P (2012) Hydraulic fracturing and water resources: separating the frack from the fiction. Pacific Institute, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  22. Darling W, Gooddy D (2006) The hydrogeochemistry of methane: evidence from English groundwaters. Chem Geol 229(4):293–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. DEP P (2011) Oil and gas well drilling and production in Pennsylvania – fact sheet. PADEP, Harrisburg

    Google Scholar 

  24. Donaldson EC, Alam W, Begum N (2014) Hydraulic fracturing explained: evaluation, implementation, and challenges. Elsevier, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eltschlager KK, Hawkins JW, Ehler WC, Baldassare F, Dep P (2001) Technical measures for the investigation and mitigation of fugitive methane hazards in areas of coal mining. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcements, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  26. EPA U (2012) Study of potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  27. ESF ESF (2013) Natural gas extraction hydraulic fracturing safe steps to a clean energy future. Retrieved 6/25/13, from http://breakingenergy.com/2013/06/25/natural-gas-extraction-hydraulic-fracturing-safe-steps-to-a-clean-energy-future/

  28. Esswein EJ, Breitenstein M, Snawder J, Kiefer M, Sieber WK (2013) Occupational exposures to respirable crystalline silica during hydraulic fracturing. J Occup Environ Hyg 10(7):347–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Field R, Soltis J, Murphy S (2014) Air quality concerns of unconventional oil and natural gas production. Environ Sci Process Impact 16(5):954–969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fritz SJ (1994) A survey of charge‐balance errors on published analyses of potable ground and surface waters. Groundwater 32(4):539–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Frohlich C (2012) Two-year survey comparing earthquake activity and injection-well locations in the Barnett Shale, Texas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(35):13934–13938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Frohlich C, Hayward C, Stump B, Potter E (2011) The Dallas–Fort Worth earthquake sequence: October 2008 through May 2009. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(1):327–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Frohlich C, Potter E, Hayward C, Stump B (2010) Dallas-Fort Worth earthquakes coincident with activity associated with natural gas production. Leading Edge 29(3):270–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gilman J, Lerner B, Kuster W, De Gouw J (2013) Source signature of volatile organic compounds from oil and natural gas operations in northeastern Colorado. Environ Sci Technol 47(3):1297–1305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Glass DC, Gray CN, Jolley DJ, Gibbons C, Sim MR, Fritschi L, Adams GG, Bisby JA, Manuell R (2003) Leukemia risk associated with low-level benzene exposure. Epidemiology 14(5):569–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Glass K (2013) Shale gas and oil terminology explained: technology, inputs & operations. Carol Werner Environmental and Energy Study Institute, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gorody AW (2012) Factors affecting the variability of stray gas concentration and composition in groundwater. Environ Geosci 19(1):17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gregory KB, Vidic RD, Dzombak DA (2011) Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing. Elements 7(3):181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Groat CG, Grimshaw TW (2012) Fact-based regulation for environmental protection in shale gas development. The Energy Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  40. Grossman EL, Coffman BK, Fritz SJ, Wada H (1989) Bacterial production of methane and its influence on ground-water chemistry in east-central Texas aquifers. Geology 17(6):495–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ground Water Protection Council; ALL Consulting (2009) Modern Shale gas development in the United States: a primer. Prepared for US Department of Energy et Office of Fossil Energy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hammer R, VanBriesen J, Levine L (2012) In fracking’s wake: new rules are needed to protect our health and environment from contaminated wastewater. Nat Resour Def Counc:11

    Google Scholar 

  43. Helmig D, Thompson C, Evans J, Boylan P, Hueber J, Park J-H (2014) Highly elevated atmospheric levels of volatile organic compounds in the Uintah Basin, Utah. Environ Sci Technol 48(9):4707–4715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hornbach MJ, DeShon HR, Ellsworth WL, Stump BW, Hayward C, Frohlich C, Oldham HR, Olson JE, Magnani MB, Brokaw C (2015) Causal factors for seismicity near Azle, Texas. Nat Commun 6. DOI 10.1038/ncomms7728

  45. Howarth RW, Santoro R, Ingraffea A (2011) Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Clim Change 106(4):679–690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Illangasekare T, Smits K, Agartan E, Trevisan L, Plampin M, Trautz A, Esposito A, Wallen B, Shulte P (2015) Improving understanding of atmospheric loading of greenhouse gases driving climate change: filling knowledge gaps to develop strategies for mitigation. THA 2015 International Conference on Climate Change and Water and Environment Management in Monsoon Asia, Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Pope CA III, Ito K, Thurston G, Krewski D, Shi Y, Calle E, Thun M (2009) Long-term ozone exposure and mortality. N Engl J Med 360(11):1085–1095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Judd A, Sim R (1998) Shallow gas migration mechanisms in deep water sediments. Offshore Site Investig Found Behav 98:163–174

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kim B-M, Park E, LeeAn S-Y, Ha M, Kim E-J, Kwon H, Hong Y-C, Jeong W-C, Hur J, Cheong H-K (2009) BTEX exposure and its health effects in pregnant women following the Hebei spirit oil spill. J Prev Med Pub Health Yebang Uihakhoe Chi 42(2):96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. King GE, King DE (2013) Environmental risk arising from well-construction failure – differences between barrier and well failure, and estimates of failure frequency across common well types, locations, and well age. SPE Prod Oper 28(04):323–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. King GE, Valencia RL (2014) Environmental risk and well integrity of plugged and abandoned wells. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kirchgessner DA, Lott RA, Cowgill RM, Harrison MR, Shires TM (1997) Estimate of methane emissions from the US natural gas industry. Chemosphere 35(6):1365–1390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Koch W (2011) Wyoming’s smog exceeds Los Angeles’ due to gas drilling. From http://content.usatoday.com/communities/greenhouse/post/2011/03/wyomings-smog-exceeds-los-angeles-due-to-gas-drilling/1#.VOeGiPldXYg

  54. Legere L (2010) Hazards posed by natural gas drilling not always underground. Scranton Times-Tribune, News section, online edition, 21 June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mauter MS, Alvarez PJ, Burton A, Cafaro DC, Chen W, Gregory KB, Jiang G, Li Q, Pittock J, Reible D (2014) Regional variation in water-related impacts of shale gas development and implications for emerging international plays. Environ Sci Technol 48(15):8298–8306

    Google Scholar 

  56. Myers T (2012) Potential contaminant pathways from hydraulically fractured shale to aquifers. Groundwater 50(6):872–882

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Nicot J, Hebel A, Ritter S, Walden S, Baier R, Galusky P, Beach J, Kyle R, Symank L, Breton C (2012) Current and projected water use in the Texas mining and oil and gas industry: the University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, Contract Report No. 090480939 prepared for Texas Water Development Board, 357 p

    Google Scholar 

  58. NIOSH (2002) Health effects of occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica. Department of Health and Human Services, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  59. NYDEC (2011) Draft supplemental general environmental impact statement: review of select non-routine incidents in Pennsylvania. NYDEC, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  60. Osborn SG, Vengosh A, Warner NR, Jackson RB (2011) Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(20):8172–8176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. PAAG PAG (2012) Greene county business owner charged with illegally dumping millions of gallons of gas drilling waste water and sewage sludge. From http://gantdaily.com/2011/03/19/greene-county-business-owner-charged-with-illegally-dumping-millions-of-gallons-of-gas-drilling-waste-water-sewage-sludge/

  62. Pless J (2012) Natural gas development and hydraulic fracturing: a policymaker’s guide. National Conference of State Legislatures, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  63. PLTA PLTA (2010) Marcellus shale drillers in Pennsylvania Amass 1614 violations since 2008–1056 identified as most likely to harm the environment. From http://s3.amazonaws.com/conserveland/s3_files/585/report_draft10oct01_final.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=1NXAG53SXSSG82H0V902&Expires=1424458865&Signature=y5MraSIDdDZydpJk%2F0CLGoTbipQ%3D

  64. Reppert J (2011) Collision spills fracking fluid on state route. Williamsport Sun-Gazette, Williamsport

    Google Scholar 

  65. Roberts W, Ehrlich R (2009) Meteorologically estimated exposure but not distance predicts asthma symptoms in schoolchildren in the environs of a petrochemical refinery: a cross-sectional study. Environ Health 8:45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Rowan E, Engle M, Kirby C, Kraemer T (2011) Radium content of oil-and gas-field produced waters in the northern Appalachian Basin (USA) – summary and discussion of data. US Geol Surv Sci Investig Rep 5135:15

    Google Scholar 

  67. Rozell DJ, Reaven SJ (2012) Water pollution risk associated with natural gas extraction from the Marcellus Shale. Risk Anal 32(8):1382–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Shonkoff SB (2012) Public health dimensions of horizontal hydraulic fracturing: knowledge, obstacles, tactics, and opportunities: a report for the 11th hour project. From http://catskillcitizens.org/learnmore/Shonkoff.pdf

  69. Silva J, Matis H, Kostedt W, Watkins V (2012) Produced water pretreatment for water recovery and salt production. Research partnership for secure energy for America, final report 08122–36. Final

    Google Scholar 

  70. Smith BJ (2011) Fracing the environment: an examination of the effects and regulation of hydraulic fracturing. Tex Wesleyan L Rev 18:129

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sunshine WL (2013) Flowback and produced water are hazardous. 10 Jan 2013. Available from: http://energy.about.com/od/drilling/a/Waste-Water-Byproducts-Of-Shale-Gas-Drilling_2.htm

  72. The Cadmus Group, I. Hydraulic fracturing: preliminary analysis of recently reported contamination. Cadmus Group, Watertown

    Google Scholar 

  73. Theodori GL (2009) Paradoxical perceptions of problems associated with unconventional natural gas development. South Rural Sociol 24(3):97–117

    Google Scholar 

  74. Uddameri V, Reible D (2015) Water availability in the Permian Basin in Texas. In: Uddameri V, Morse A, Tindle K (eds) Fracturing impacts and technologies- a multidisciplinary perspective. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  75. Utah Department of Transportation (2007) Oil & gas truck traffic impacts on U.S.40 Corridor, Salt Lake City

    Google Scholar 

  76. Utah State University (2012) Final report, 2012 UINTAH Basin winter Ozone and air quality study. Commercialization Development and Regional, Logan

    Google Scholar 

  77. Veil J (2010) Final report: water management technologies used by Marcellus shale gas producers, NETL, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne

    Google Scholar 

  78. Vengosh A, Jackson RB, Warner N, Darrah TH, Kondash A (2014) A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 48(15):8334–8348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Vidic R, Brantley S, Vandenbossche J, Yoxtheimer D, Abad J (2013) Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science 340(6134):1235009. DOI 10.1038/ncomms7728

    Google Scholar 

  80. Warner NR, Jackson RB, Darrah TH, Osborn SG, Down A, Zhao K, White A, Vengosh A (2012) Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(30):11961–11966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. WGAL (2011) DEP reports Marcellus Shale Well Blowout. From http://www.wgal.com/DEP-Reports-Marcellus-Shale-Well-Blowout/6654430

  82. Williams J, Reible D, Darvari R, Vercellino T, Morse A (2015) Reuse and recycling flowback and produced waters. In: Uddameri V, Morse A, Tindle K (eds) Fracturing impacts and technologies- a multidisciplinary spproach. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wolf Eagle Environmental (2009) Town of DISH, Texas ambient air monitoring analysis. Final report. Wolf Eagle Environmental, Flower Mound

    Google Scholar 

  84. Yamamoto S, Alcauskas JB, Crozier TE (1976) Solubility of methane in distilled water and seawater. J Chem Eng Data 21(1):78–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

    Danny D. Reible, Soraya Honarparvar & Chau-Chyun Chen

  2. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA

    Tissa H. Illangasekare

  3. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA

    Margaret MacDonell

Authors
  1. Danny D. Reible
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Soraya Honarparvar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chau-Chyun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tissa H. Illangasekare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Margaret MacDonell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danny D. Reible .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Grove, United Kingdom

    Stefan Orszulik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reible, D.D., Honarparvar, S., Chen, CC., Illangasekare, T.H., MacDonell, M. (2016). Environmental Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing. In: Orszulik, S. (eds) Environmental Technology in the Oil Industry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24334-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation