Skip to main content

Scientific Community Actions to Shape Enhanced Nuclear Safeguards and Non-proliferation Policies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Cooperation for Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Security, Safeguards and Non-proliferation

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Physics ((SPPHY,volume 172))

  • 391 Accesses

Abstract

Given the scientific and technological complexity of the nuclear issues, it is more than trivial how important the role of scientific community is. This is not only through for nations being nuclear, irrespective of how developed they are, but also for those nations in the developing of less developed countries looking forward to their future civil and defensive needs. This makes the role of the scientific community much more broad and within a very wide spectrum of activities than the politicians may like.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A recent book has been particularly enlightening on this subject: Eric Schlosser, Command and Control The Penguin Press 2013.

  2. 2.

    It significant that the new US Posture Review declares that US nuclear weapons will not be used against non-nuclear States that are in “good standing” with the NPT. This represents progress with respect to the previous US position, although the US still keeps the right to decide which state is in good standing and which is not, and the use of nuclear weapons is not unconditionally excluded against non-nuclear-weapon states.

  3. 3.

    At the end of the Cold War, Russia found itself in a condition of conventional inferiority vis a vis the West and abandoned the no-first-use posture, accepting the idea that nuclear weapons could be meaningfully used to countervail a conventional inferiority.

  4. 4.

    34th IAEA General Conference: Resolution adopted during the 332nd plenary meeting on 21 September 1990: “prohibition against all armed attacks against nuclear installations devoted to peaceful purposes whether under construction or in operation”.

References

  1. W. Janssens, K. Luetzenkirchen, H. Emons, S. Abousahl, Y. Aregbe, R. Berndt, G. Cojazzi, M. Hedberg, F. Littmann, K. Mayer, P. Peerani, and V. Sequeira. Recent JRC Achievements and Future Challenges in Verification for Nuclear Safeguards and Nonproliferation. JNMM, Journal of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management 40 (4) 11-23, (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Janssens, P. Peerani, C. Bergonzi, E. Wolfart, F. Littmann, G. Mercurio, L. Dechamp and P. Richir, Advanced Safeguards Measurement, Monitoring and Modelling Laboratory (AS3ML). In Conference Proceedings: Proc. 2014 IAEA Symposium in International Safeguards. Vienna (Austria): IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency, 134, (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Abousahl , V. Ranguelova, W. Janssens, M. De Cort, U. Waetjen, G. Cojazzi, M. Marin Ferrer, V. Sequeira, M. Wallenius, K. Mayer and M. Hedberg, Technical Synergies between Nuclear Safety and Security. In Conference Proceedings: Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, editor. The 53rd Institute of Nuclear Materials Management (INMM) Annual Meeting Proceedings 2012. Deerfield (USA): Institute of Nuclear Materials Management (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Janssens, G. Cojazzi, F. Sevini and C. Versino, Innovation in Safeguards R&D and EU Contributions to Strengthening the Global Safeguards System, In Conference Proceedings: Proc. 2010 IAEA Symposium in International Safeguards. Vienna (Austria): IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency, 134, (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Janssens, M. Scholz, T. Jonter, M. Marin Ferrer and A. De Luca, Nuclear Safeguards and Non Proliferation Education and Training, initiatives by ESARDA, INMM and JRC. In: ESARDA SYMPOSIUM; 27 May 2013; Brugge (Belgium). 35th ESARDA Symposium proceedings (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Braunegger-Guelich, J. Crete , C. Gariazzo, W. Janssens, P. Peerani and S. Ward, Need for strengthening Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Safeguards Education to prepare the next generation of experts. In Conference Proceedings: IAEA, editor. Proc. 2014 IAEA Symposium in International Safeguards. Vienna (Austria): IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency, 182 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Mansouri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mansouri, R., Janssens, W., Rabinovici, E., Cotta-Ramusino, P. (2016). Scientific Community Actions to Shape Enhanced Nuclear Safeguards and Non-proliferation Policies. In: Maiani, L., Abousahl, S., Plastino, W. (eds) International Cooperation for Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Security, Safeguards and Non-proliferation. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 172. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24322-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics