Skip to main content

The Proof Certifier Checkers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9323))

Abstract

Different theorem provers work within different formalisms and paradigms, and therefore produce various incompatible proof objects. Currently there is a big effort to establish foundational proof certificates (fpc), which would serve as a common “specification language” for all these formats. Such framework enables the uniform checking of proof objects from many different theorem provers while relying on a small and trusted kernel to do so. Checkers is an implementation of a proof checker using foundational proof certificates. By trusting a small kernel based on (focused) sequent calculus on the one hand and by supporting fpc specifications in a prolog-like language on the other hand, it can be used for checking proofs of a wide range of theorem provers. The focus of this paper is on the output of equational resolution theorem provers and for this end, we specify the paramodulation rule. We describe the architecture of Checkers and demonstrate how it can be used to check proof objects by supplying the fpc specification for a subset of the inferences used by eprover and checking proofs using these inferences.

Funded by the ERC Advanced Grant ProofCert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balint, A., Gall, D., Kapler, G., Retz, R.: Experiment design and administration for computer clusters for SAT-solvers (EDACC). JSAT (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boespflug, M., Carbonneaux, Q., Hermant, O.: The λΠ-calculus modulo as a universal proof language. In: Pichardie, D., Weber, T. (eds.) Proceedings of PxTP2012: Proof Exchange for Theorem Proving, pp. 28–43 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chihani, Z., Miller, D., Renaud, F.: Checking foundational proof certificates for first-order logic (extended abstract). In: Blanchette, J.C., Urban, J. (eds.) Third International Workshop on Proof Exchange for Theorem Proving (PxTP 2013). EPiC Series, vol. 14, pp. 58–66. EasyChair (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chihani, Z., Miller, D., Renaud, F.: Foundational proof certificates in first-order logic. In: Bonacina, M.P. (ed.) CADE 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7898, pp. 162–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Grabowski, A., Kornilowicz, A., Naumowicz, A.: Mizar in a Nutshell. Journal of Formalized Reasoning 3(2), 153–245 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Liang, C., Miller, D.: Focusing and polarization in linear, intuitionistic, and classical logics. Theoretical Computer Science 410(46), 4747–4768 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller, D.: Proofcert: Broad spectrum proof certificates, February 2011, an ERC Advanced Grant funded for the five years 2012-2016

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miller, D., Nadathur, G.: Programming with Higher-Order Logic. Cambridge University Press, June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  9. Otten, J., Sutcliffe, G.: Using the tptp language for representing derivations in tableau and connection calculi. In: Schmidt, R.A., Schulz, S., Konev, B. (eds.) PAAR-2010. EPiC Series, vol. 9, pp. 95–105. EasyChair (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson, G., Wos, L.: Paramodulation and theorem-proving in first-order theories with equality. In: Automation of Reasoning, pp. 298–313. Springer (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schulz, S.: System description: E 1.8. In: McMillan, K., Middeldorp, A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR-19 2013. LNCS, vol. 8312, pp. 735–743. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Stump, A., Reynolds, A., Tinelli, C., Laugesen, A., Eades, H., Oliver, C., Zhang, R.: LFSC for SMT Proofs: Work in Progress

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zakaria Chihani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chihani, Z., Libal, T., Reis, G. (2015). The Proof Certifier Checkers . In: De Nivelle, H. (eds) Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods. TABLEAUX 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9323. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24312-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24312-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24311-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24312-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics