Advertisement

Social Capital and Corruption: Evidence from Western Balkan Countries

  • Marija DžunićEmail author
  • Nataša Golubović
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract

Throughout the last decade, empirical evidence from transition countries has confirmed low levels of social capital, a resource often regarded as a determinant of the speed of reforms, economic growth and social development in these countries. On the other hand, corruption is considered to be closely related to social capital, whereas high levels of corruption reflect institutional weakness, which impedes contract enforcement. Such environment prevents building trust relations between economic actors. There are opinions that certain types of social capital are likely to increase corruption, which brings into question the causal direction of their relationship. The aim of the paper is to measure and compare the levels of social capital and corruption in Western Balkan countries. In addition, relations between social capital, corruption and GDP per capita levels will be explored in order to establish whether higher corrupt countries report lower levels of trust and civic participation and therefore lower GDP per capita.

Keywords

Corruption Social capital Trust GDP Western Balkans 

JEL Classification Codes

Z13—Social Norms, Social Capital and Social Networks D73—Corruption 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development for the funds and support that made this research possible.

References

  1. Adam F, Makarovic M, Roncevic B, Tomsic M (2004) The challenges of sustained development: the role of socio-cultural factors in East Central Europe. Central European University Press, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  2. Advig JC, Fjeldstad O (2000) Research on corruption: a policy oriented survey. The Norwegian Agency for Development Co-operation (NORAD), December 2000Google Scholar
  3. Bjornskov C (2004) How does social trust affect economic growth. Working paper 06-02, Aarhus School of Business, Department of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  4. Brioschi CA (2004) Breve storia della corruzione: dall’età antica ai giorni nostri. TEA, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  5. EVS (2011) European values study 2008: integrated dataset (EVS 2008). Gesis Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA4800, datafile version 3.0.0. Doi:  10.4232/1.11004
  6. Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: the social virtue and the creation of prosperity. Hamish Hamilton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris D (2007) Bonding social capital and corruption: a cross-national empirical analysis. Environmental economy and policy research working papers, no 27.2007. University of Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. La Porta R et al (1997) Trust in large organizations. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 87(2):333–338Google Scholar
  9. Lambsdorff JG (2007) The institutional economics of corruption and reform: theory, evidence and policy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lipset SM, Lenz GS (2000) Corruption, culture, and market. In: Harrison LE, Huntingdon SP (eds) Culture matters: how values shape human progress. Basic Books, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. Mauro P (1995) Corruption and growth. Q J Econ 110(3):681–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Paldam M (2002) The cross-country pattern of corruption: economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics. Eur J Polit Econ 18(2):215–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Paldam M, Svedsen GT (2000) An essay on social capital: looking for the fire behind the smoke. Eur J Polit Econ 16(2):339–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Paldam M, Svedsen GT (2001) Missing social capital and the transition in Eastern Europe. J Inst Innov Dev Transit 5:21–33Google Scholar
  15. Putnam RD (1993) Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  16. Putnam RD (1995) Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. Polit Sci Polit 28(4):664–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raiser M (1999) Trust in transition. EBRD working paper no. 39. EBRD, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Rose-Ackerman S (1999) Corruption and government. Causes, consequences and reform. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schleifer A, Vishny R (1993) Corruption. Q J Econ 108(3):599–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanzi V (1995) Corruption: arm’s-length relationships and markets. In: Fiorentini G, Pelzman SM (eds) The economics of organised crime. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Transparency International (2010) Corruption perceptions index 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2010/in_detail [16 Apr 2014]Google Scholar
  23. Treisman D (2000) The causes of corruption: a cross national study. J Public Econ 76(3):399–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Uslaner EM (2004) Trust and corruption. In: Lambsdorf JG et al (eds) Corruption and the new institutional economics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. World Bank, World Development Indicators [Online]. Available: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators [16 Apr 2014]Google Scholar
  26. WVS (2009) World values survey 1981–2008 official aggregate v.20090901Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of NišNišSerbia

Personalised recommendations