Abstract
The practice of “structural experimenting” and inattention to structural disproportions is impermissible in the modern conditions of macroeconomic management. In order to properly determine the direction of restructuring of an economy, there should be conveyed a detailed sectoral analysis. It should provide us with knowledge about which sectors should be specially stimulated in the future, in order to accelerate the economic development of a country. It certainly does not mean that other sectors should be neglected, because such wrong decision would bring deeper structural disparities in national economy.
The restructuring of the economy is momentarily one of the most complex macroeconomic issues of the Republic of Serbia. In the order of activities, first of all, there should be identified the leading sectors of the economy of Serbia, which are the framework of its economic development. Also, there should be identified potential “pulling” sectors, that would give way to future structural changes and future economic structure of Serbia. The structure of economy of Serbia should be “adjusted” in such way that should even in the long run provide a stable economic growth, and to lessen the disbalance of the balance of payment, to increase the competitiveness of the economy, to decrease the unemployment, and finally, to increase the social standard of living.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
e.g. in paper N. Crespo, M. P. Fontoura, “Integration of CEECs into EU Markets: Structural Change and Convergence”, ISEG-UTL, Lisboa, 2004, that is Lawrence index; by М. Korosic that is index of structural changes; in paper A. Dietrich, “Does Growth Cause Structural Change, or is it the Other Way Round?”, A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis for Seven OECD Countries, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, 2009 that is Michaely index.
References
Arandjelovic Z, Marjanovic V (2011) The influence of material and system factors on the economic structure. In: Science and the world economic crisis. University of Nis, Faculty of Economics, Nis
Crespo N, Fontoura MP (2004) Integration of CEECs into EU markets: structural change and convergence. ISEG-UTL, Lisboa
Dietrich A (2009) Does growth cause structural change, or is it the other way round? In: A dynamic panel data analysis for seven OECD countries. Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena
Kauffmann A (2005) Structural change and economic dynamics in transition economies. In: Structural change and exchange rate dynamics. Springer, Berlin
UN Economic and Social Affairs (2006) World economic and social survey 2006, diverging growth and development
Welfens P, Wziatek-Kubiak A (2005) Introduction. In: Structural change and exchange rate dynamics. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marjanovic, V., Arandjelovic, Z. (2016). Sectoral Analysis of Structural Changes of the Republic of Serbia. In: Karasavvoglou, A., Aranđelović, Z., Marinković, S., Polychronidou, P. (eds) The First Decade of Living with the Global Crisis. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24267-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24267-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24266-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24267-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)