Abstract
Self-Directed Learning (SDL) is gaining interest, as online learning is increasingly learner-centered. FutureLearn courses provide an array of online interactions and content deliveries, which have allowed the authors to investigate a diversity of SDL elements. This preliminary research examines the SDL taking place in three FutureLearn courses, and categorises those learner actions into meaningful elements and dimensions for the learners. The SDL framework by Bouchard [1] is used to interpret the self-reported findings coming from active learners. The research uses a grounded theory approach to look for learner experiences related to four dimensions (algorithmic, conative, semiotic, and economic) of the Bouchard [1] framework, and to discover new dimensions. Various research instruments are used: online surveys, learning logs, and one-on-one interviews, all collected pre-, during, or post-course. The initial adaptation of Bouchard’s framework offers insights into SDL, its meaning, and value as perceived by the learners.
References
Bouchard, P.: Pedagogy without a teacher: what are the limits. Int. J. Self-Directed Learn. 6(2), 13–22 (2009)
Siemens, G.: Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Int. J. Instr. Technol. Distance Learn. 2(1), 3–10 (2005)
Downes, S.: Evaluating a MOOC [Web log post]. http://halfanhour.blogspot.ca/2013/03/evaluat-ing-mooc.html (2013). Accessed 14 June 2015
Kop, R., Fournier, H.: New dimensions to self-directed learning in an open networked learning environment. Int. J. Self-Directed Learn. 7(2), 2–20 (2011)
de Waard, I., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M.: Self-directed learning in trial FutureLearn courses. In: Proceedings of the European Stakeholder Summit 2015, pp. 234–243 (2015)
Knowles, M.S.: Self-Directed Learning. Association Press, New York (1975)
Song, L., Hill, J.R.: A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. J. Interact. Online Learn. 6(1), 27–42 (2007)
Milligan, C., Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A.: Patterns of engagement in massive open online courses. MERLOT J. Online Learn. Teach. 9(2), 149–159 (2013)
de Waard, I.: Analyzing the Impact of Mobile Access on Learner Interactions in a MOOC. Masters dissertation, Athabasca University. https://dt.athabascau.ca/jspui/bitstream/10791/23/1/Master%20thesis%20Inge%20de%20Waard%20MEd%20publication%20final%20reviewed.pdf (2013)
Long, H.B.: Philosophical, psychological, and practical justifications for studying self-directed learning. In: Long, H.B., Associates, Self-directed Learning: Application and Research. Oklahoma Research Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73037 (1992)
Charmaz, K.: Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Pine Forge Press, CA (2006)
Creswell, J.W.: Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications, London (2006)
Sharples, M.: FutureLearn and Pedagogy. Internal presentation circulated during Learning Fair, The Open University (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
de Waard, I., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M. (2015). Investigating Self-directed Learning Dimensions: Adapting the Bouchard Framework. In: Conole, G., Klobučar, T., Rensing, C., Konert, J., Lavoué, E. (eds) Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World. EC-TEL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9307. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24257-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24258-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)