Skip to main content

What Do Buyers Want From Their Relationships With Optical Buying Groups? The Role of Embeddedness, Switching Costs, and Commitment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Independent optical shops (or independents) are increasingly being squeezed out by competition from first, warehouse clubs and superstores such as Walmart and Costco which have the means to penetrate the low and middle markets at a national level and second, from direct marketers such as 1-800-Contacts entering the industry with low online pricing. The increasing commodization and price competition in certain segments of the optical market (e.g., contact lens) has made it even more difficult for independents to co-exist with these competitors. Compounded by their inability to offer lower prices comparable to the larger chains as well as the lack of individual negotiating power with manufacturers, many small independents have turned to buying groups (sometimes called cooperatives or purchasing alliances) to help drastically reduce product acquisition costs and to stay competitive as independent entities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, N. J., and Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, G. (2003). When does commitment lead to loyalty?. Journal of Service Research, 5, 333-344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gounaris, S. P. (2005). Trust and commitment influences on customer retention: Insights from business-to-business services. Journal of Business Research, 58, 126-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. and Nickerson, J. (2008). Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. Organization Science, 19, 1-21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jap, S. D. (1999). Pie-expansion efforts: collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 461-475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., Reynolds, K., Mothersbaugh, D., and Beatty, S. (2007). The positive and negative effects of switching costs on relational outcomes. Journal of Service Research, 9, 335-355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh, D. L. and Beatty, S. E. (2002). Why customers stay: Measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 55, 441-450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, N., Young, L. & Wilkinson, I. (2006). The commitment mix: dimensions of commitment in international trading relationships in india. Journal of International Marketing, 14, 64-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellefsen, T. and Thomas, G. P. (2005). The antecedents and consequences of organizational and personal commitment in business service relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 23-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. and Yanamandram, V. (2004). Why customers stay: reasons and consequences of inertia in financial services. Managing Service Quality, 14, 183-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yeoh, PL. (2016). What Do Buyers Want From Their Relationships With Optical Buying Groups? The Role of Embeddedness, Switching Costs, and Commitment. In: Campbell, C., Ma, J. (eds) Looking Forward, Looking Back: Drawing on the Past to Shape the Future of Marketing. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24184-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics