Skip to main content

What Is High Quality Teacher Education?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education ((PROD,volume 13))

Abstract

US teacher education is experiencing unprecedented governmental intrusion at both the state and federal levels into every facet of teacher preparation. Initiatives by both the Bush and Obama administrations have intensified the accountability expectations for all providers. There are competing narratives regarding what constitutes high quality teacher preparation with so-called “reformers” competing with “traditionalists” to influence public policy. While no one is sure of the outcome, enrolments in teacher education courses and programs are plummeting at the same time that elementary and secondary teacher job satisfaction is rising. An unintended but pervasive teacher shortage may be the consequence of such actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, S., & Henneberry, S. (2013). U of M and teach for America agree to develop new teacher preparation program. UMNews. Twin Cities: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, B. L. (2006). Teacher education policies in the US: The accountability shift since 1980. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(4), 395–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, B. L. (2007). Teacher education reform in the US and the theoretical constructs of stakeholder mediation. International Journal of Educational Policy and Leadership, 2(6), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D., & Forzani, F. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenges of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 497–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, M. (2013). Growing education achievement training academies for teachers and principals Act. S. 1052, 113th Congress, 2013–2015. Washington, DC: US Senate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B., Montgomery, D., & Snyder, J. (2008). Urban teacher residency models and institutes of higher education: Implications for teacher preparation. Washington, DC: National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, K. (1946). The improvement of teacher education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, G. (2014). Enrolment in teacher education courses is declining. PublicSchool Shakedown. Retrieved from www.publicschoolshakedown.org/enrollment-in-teacher-education-courses-is-declining.html

  • Charters, W. W., & Waples, D. (1929). The Commonwealth teacher training study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, C. M. (1952). The Ford Foundation-Arkansas experiment. Journal of Teacher Education, 3(4), 260–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2001). Reforming teacher education: Competing agendas. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(4), 263–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, M. (2002). The discourse of reform in teacher education: Extending the dialogue. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 26–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., Piazza, P., & Power, C. (2013). The politics of accountability: Assessing teacher education in the United States. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 6–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2013). Accreditation standards and evidence: Aspirations for educator preparation. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, E. (2011). Race to the top and teacher preparation. Washington, DC: The Center for American Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, E., Allen, M., & Coble, C. (2013) Outcomes, measures and data systems. A paper prepared for the CAEP Commission on Standards and Performance Reporting. Chapel Hill: Teacher Prep Analytics, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010a). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: How teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010b). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DelFatore, J. (2012). Knowledge in the making: Academic freedom and free speech in America’s schools and universities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, A. (2009). Teacher preparation: Reforming the uncertain profession. Address by the US Secretary of Education at Teachers College, Columbia University, New York. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/

  • Edelfelt, R., & Raths, J. (1999). A brief history of standards in teacher education. Reston: Association of Teacher Educators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feistritzer, C. E. (2011). Profiles of teachers in the U.S. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuer, M., Floden, R., Chudowsky, N., & Ahn, J. (2013). Evaluation of teacher preparation programs: Purposes, methods, and policy options. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frakas, S., & Duffett, A. (2010). Cracks in the ivory tower? The views of education professors, circa 2010. Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, E. (2014). Shaky methods, shaky motives: A critique of the National Council of Teacher Quality’s review of teacher preparation programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J., Barton, L., Miles, S., Whiting, C., & Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher education in transition: Re-forming professionalism. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D. (2013). Teacher quality research over the next decade. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D., & Liddle, S. (2012). The gateway to the profession: Assessing teacher preparation programs based on student achievement (Calder Working Paper No. 65). Retrieved from http://www.caldercenter.org/upload/Goldhaber-et-al.pdf

  • Goodlad, J. I. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., McKee, A., & Walsh, K. (2013). Prep review 2013 report: A report of the Nation’s Teacher Prep Programs. Washington, DC: National Council for Teacher Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., & Loeb, S. (2010). Learning from multiple routes: The variation in professional pathways can propel our understanding of how best to prepare teachers. Educational Leadership, 67(8), 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow’s teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D. C., & Wechsler, M. E. (2007). Insights into alternative certification: Initial findings from a national study. Teachers College Record, 109(3), 483–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imig, D., Wiseman, D., & Imig, S. (2011). Teacher education in the United States. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(4), 399–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. J., & Cantrell, S. (2011). Learning about teaching: Initial finds from the measures of effective teaching project. Cambridge, MA: MET Project, Harvard Graduate School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S. N. (2013). Reshaping US public education policy. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/reshapingu.s.public.education policy

  • Koenig, R. (2014). Education degree programs, once popular, take a nosedive. Chronicle of Higher Education. rieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Education_Degree_Programs/1492777/?cid=at&utm_source+at&utm_medium+em

  • Kronholz, J. (2012). A new type of ed school: Linking candidate success to student success. Education Next. Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/a-new-type-of-ed-school/

  • Learned, W., & Bagley, W. C. (1920). The professional preparation of teachers for American public schools (Bulletin Number Fourteen). New York: Carnegie Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. D., & Young, T. V. (2013). The politics of accountability: Teacher education policy. Education Policy, 27(2), 190–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. The Journal of Teacher Education, xx(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, S., Rotherham, A., & Brown, R. (2012). The Hangover: Thinking about the unintended consequences of the nation’s teacher evaluation binge. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Committee on the Study of Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States. Division of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noell, G. H., & Burns, J. L. (2006). Value-added assessment of teacher preparation: An illustration of emerging technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockoff, J. E., Jacob, B. A., Kane, T. J., & Stigler, D. O. (2008). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sawchuk, S. (2012). New advocacy groups shaking up education field. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/05/16/31/adv-overvie…

  • Sawchuk, S. (2014). Ed. Dept. teacher-prep regulations released; Aim to tie aid to program performance. Teacher Beat. Education Week. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacherbeat/2014/11/ed_dept_teacher-prep-regulatio.html

  • Teacher preparation issues, notice of a proposed rule by the Education Department, Federal Register, 79 FR, 71819-71892, 34 CFR 612, Dec.3, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education. (2010). Race to the top program, executive summary. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.ed/gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf

  • US Department of Education. (2011). Our future, our teachers: The Obama administration’s plan for teacher education reform and improvement. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education. (2013). Proposed rule making: Teacher prep issues (NPRM 7 31 12, 34 CFR Parts 612 and 682). Washington, DC: Office of Postsecondary Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, D. (2012). The intersection of policy, reform, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. (2014). The struggle for the soul of teaching and teacher education in the USA. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 551–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K., & Sandoval, C. (2013). Venture philanthropy and teacher education policy in the US: The role of the new school venture fund. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco: AERA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Imig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Imig, D., Wiseman, D.L., Wiseman, A., Imig, S.R. (2016). What Is High Quality Teacher Education?. In: Chi-Kin Lee, J., Day, C. (eds) Quality and Change in Teacher Education. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24139-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24139-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24137-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24139-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics