Abstract
Currently, the suitable indoor temperature is commonly defined according to the thermal comfort theory formulated by Fanger (1970). This approach bases the definition of thermal comfort on mere physics and completely neglects the social and psychological aspects of thermal perception. Moreover, its formulation is completely steady-state, determining a very narrow range of allowable temperatures throughout the year regardless of the outdoor conditions. An alternative approach to defining comfortable temperatures is the adaptive approach, which stems from the results of a wide range of field studies. It assumes that the thermal expectations of the users are linked to the outside climatic conditions on a variable basis. This chapter describes these two approaches and summarises the most relevant adaptive comfort indices. Furthermore, based on the different adaptive formulations, the comfortable temperature trends are derived and compared for two locations in Italy characterized by opposite climatic conditions. Finally, the possible implications on building thermal performance are analysed by means of a case study application.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
ASHRAE Standard 55, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, 2004)
N. Baker, M. Standeven, A behavioural approach to thermal comfort assessment. Int. J. Sol. Energy 19, 21–35 (1996)
G.S. Brager, L. Baker, Occupant satisfaction in mixed-mode buildings, in Proceedings of the Air Conditioning and the Low Carbon Cooling Challenge Conference, Windsor, 27–29 July 2008
G.S. Brager, R.J. deDear, Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review. Energy Build. 27, 83–96 (1998)
S. Carlucci, L. Pagliano, A review of indices for the long-term evaluation of the general thermal comfort conditions in buildings. Energy Build. 53, 194–205 (2012)
D.B. Crawley, L.K. Lawrie, F.C. Winkelmann et al., Energyplus: creating a new generation building energy simulation program. Energy Build. 33, 319–331 (2001)
R.J. deDear, G.S. Brager, ASHRAE RP-884 Final Report—Developibng an Adaptive Model of Thermal Comfort and Preference (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, 1997)
R.J. deDear, G.S. Brager, The adaptive model of thermal comfort and energy conservation in the built environment. Int. J. Biometeorol. 45, 100–108 (2001)
EN 15251, Indoor Environmental Input Parameters for Design and Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Addressing Indoor Air Quality, Thermal Environment, Lighting and Acoustics (European Committee of Standardization, Brussels, 2007)
P.O. Fanger, Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Applications on Environmental Technology (Danisch Technical Press, Copenhagen, 1970)
S. Ferrari, V. Zanotto, Adaptive comfort towards energy savings, in Proceedings of PALENC 2010—Cooling the Cities—The Absolute Priority, Rhodes, 29 Sept–1 Oct 2010
S. Ferrari, V. Zanotto, Adaptive comfort: analysis and application of the main indices. Build. Environ. 49, 25–32 (2012)
N. Fransson, D. Västfjäll, J. Skoog, In search of the comfortable environment: a comparison of the utility of objective and subjective indicators of indoor comfort. Build. Environ. 45(2), 1886–1890 (2007)
L.R. Glicksmann, S. Taub, Thermal and behavioural modelling of occupant-comtrolled heating, ventilating and air-conditioning systems. Energy Build. 25, 243–249 (1997)
E. Gossauer, A. Wagner, Post-occupancy evaluation and thermal comfort: state of the art and new approaches. Adv. Build. Energy Res. 1, 151–175 (2007)
M.A. Humphreys, Field studies of thermal comfort compared and applied. Build. Serv. Eng. 44, 5–27 (1976)
M.A. Humphreys, Thermal comfort temperature worldwide—the current position, in Proceedings of WREC, Denver, 15–21 June 1996
M.A. Humphreys, M. Hancock, Do people like to feel “neutral”? Exploring the variation of the desired thermal sensation on the ASHRAE scale. Energy Build. 39, 867–874 (2007)
ISO 7730, Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment—Analytical Determination and Interpretation of Thermal Comfort Using Calculation of the PMV and PPD Indices and Local Thermal Comfort Criteria (International Standard Organisation, Geneva, 2005)
K.J. McCartney, J.F. Nicol, Developing an adaptive algorithm for Europe. Energy Build. 34, 623–637 (2002)
J.F. Nicol, M.A. Humphreys, O. Sykes et al., Standards for Thermal Comfort: Indoor Air Temperature Standards for the 21st Century (Chapman & Hall, London, 1995)
ThermCo, Interrelation Between Different Comfort Parameters and Their Importance in Occupant Satisfaction. Report for the Thermal Comfort in Buildings with Low-Energy Cooling European Project (2009)
A.C. Van der Linden, A.C. Boerstra, A.K. Raue et al., Adaptive temperature limits: a new guideline in The Netherlands. A new approach for the assessment of building performance of with respect to thermal indoor climate. Energy Build. 38, 8–17 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferrari, S., Zanotto, V. (2016). Thermal Comfort Approaches and Building Performance. In: Building Energy Performance Assessment in Southern Europe. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24136-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24136-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24134-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24136-4
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)