Skip to main content

Co-construction of Meaning via a Collaborative Action Research Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9320))

Abstract

This article sets out the four stages of an analytical approach which enables student - designers at the end of their academic career in the domain of design, to “metareflectively” consider their design and collaboration processes. Inspired by collaborative action research approaches, this analytical approach aims to create a space in which the student can learn and co-construct meaning relative to the activity of collaborative design. It plays a role in enabling the learner/designer/observer to take a step back from their activities, both when considering the activity in isolation and in confronting it to others’ points of view. This article explains the steps and tools (methodological, theoretical and analytical) involved; it also provides feedback on experiences from 7 different contexts. It shows how the system as a whole enables analysis, interpretation, questioning, and critical and collective reflection of the situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hmelo-Silver, C.E.: Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ. Psychol. 16(3), 235–266 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hubers, J.C.: Collaborative architectural design of buildings. The COLAB case. Int. J. Des. Sci. Technol. 16(1), 61–72 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dolbec, A.: La recherche-action. In: Gauthier, B. (ed.) Recherche sociale: De la problématique à la collecte des données, pp. 505–540. PUQ, Québec (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bourassa, M., Philion, R., Chevalier, J.: L’analyse de construits, une co-construction de groupe. Education et Francophonie 35(2), 78–117 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reason, P., Bradbury, H.: Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Sage, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lavoie, L., Marquis, D., Laurin, P.: La recherche-action, théorie et pratique, manuel d’auto-formation. PUQ, Sainte-Foy (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dubost, J., Lévy, A.: Recherche-action et intervention. In: Barus-Michel, J., Enriquez, E., Lévy, A. (eds.) Vocabulaire de Psychosociologie, Références et positions, pp. 391–416. Éres, Paris (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Couture, C., Bednarz, N., Barry, S.: Multiples regards sur la recherche participative, une lecture transversale. In: Anadòn, M., Savoie-Zajc, L. (eds.) La recherche participative. Multi-ples regards, pp. 205–221. PUQ, Québec (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Desgagné, S.: Le défi de coproduction de « savoir » en recherche collaborative, analyse d’une démarche de reconstruction et d’analyse de récits de pratique enseignante. In: Anadòn, M., Savoie-Zajc, L. (eds.) La recherche participative. Multiples regards, pp. 89–121. PUQ, Québec (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Legendre, M.F.: Approches constructivistes et nouvelles orientations curriculaires: D’un curriculum fondé sur l’approche par objectifs à un curriculum axé sur le développement de compétences. In: Jonnaert, P., Masciotra, D. (eds.) Constructivisme Choix contemportains, pp. 51–91. Presses de l’Université du Québec, Québec (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ben Rajeb, S.: Conception collaborative distante: étude architecturologique pour la caractérisation des opérations cognitives. In: Angenot, V., Safin, S., Dondelero, M.G., Leclercq, P. (eds.) Interfaces numériques: Collaborer à distance, enjeux et impacts des interfaces numériques dans les pratiques collaboratives, vol 2, no. 3, pp. 509–530. Lavoisier (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gerson, E.: Reach, bracket, and the limits of rationalized coordination: some challenges for CSCW. In: Ackerman, M., Christine, H., Erickson, T., Kellogg, W.A. (eds.) Resources, Co-evolution and Artefacts: Theory in CSCW, pp. 193–220. Springer, London (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Leclercq, P.: COMMON’14. Communication multimodale et collaboration instrumentée. Atelier des Presses de l’Université de Liège (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Leclercq .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rajeb, S.B., Leclercq, P. (2015). Co-construction of Meaning via a Collaborative Action Research Approach. In: Luo, Y. (eds) Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering. CDVE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24132-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24132-6_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24131-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24132-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics