• Genesis T. Yengoh
  • David Dent
  • Lennart Olsson
  • Anna E. Tengberg
  • Compton J. TuckerIII
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science book series (BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL)


The global demand for food is rising steeply as a result of burgeoning population, shifting dietary preferences, and food wastage, while increasing demands for renewable energy are competing with food production (Hubert et al. 2010). In 2009, the FAO estimated that we must increase the global food production by 70 % to meet demands in 2050 (FAO 2009). But this figure is questioned and may be an underestimate, which further underlines the urgency of global food provisioning (Tilman 2010; Tilman et al. 2002), particularly in the light of the revised World Population Prospects 2012 predicting significantly higher population increase than earlier projections, especially for many countries in sub-Saharan Africa (UN 2013). Further, accelerating climate change is projected to have severe impacts on crop productivity over large parts of the globe (Porter et al. 2014). The combination of increasing water scarcity, as a result of climate warming, and increasing competition across sectors is likely to cause dramatic situations in terms of food and water security in many regions (Strzepek and Boehlert 2010). At the same time “business as usual is not an option.” This was the stern message from the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology (IAASTD) when it was presented by its chairman Bob Watson in 2008. By this he meant that agriculture does not deliver what we need—food security for all—instead it undermines the global environment in terms of land degradation; greenhouse gas emissions; pollution of soils, rivers, lakes, and oceans; and reducing biodiversity (Foley et al. 2011). The threat to food security represents a planetary emergency that demands a variety of creative solutions and policies at global, regional, and local levels. One of the most urgent responses to this situation must be measures to stop and reverse land degradation. But such solutions are currently hampered by the lack of reliable data as well as methods for collecting such data. This report is a review of the state of the art of remote sensing techniques for assessing land degradation and improvements.


Normalize Difference Vegetation Index Land Degradation Normalize Difference Vegetation Index Data Sustainable Land Management Normalize Difference Vegetation Index Trend 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anyamba A, Tucker C (2005) Analysis of Sahelian vegetation dynamics using NOAA-AVHRR NDVI data from 1981–2003. J Arid Environ 63(3):596–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai ZG, Dent DL, Olsson L, Schaepman ME (2008) Proxy global assessment of land degradation. Soil Use Manag 24(3):223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bierman R, Stocking M, Bouwman H, Cowie A, Diaz S, Granit J, Patwardhan A, Sims R, Duron G, Gorsevski V, Hammond T, Wellington-Moore C (2014) Delivering global environmental benefits for sustainable development. Report of the Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel (STAP) to the 5th GEF Assembly, México 2014. Global Environment Facility, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowie A, Penman T, Gorissen L, Winslow M, Lehmann J, Tyrrell T, Twomlow S, Wilkes A, Lal R, Jones J (2011) Towards sustainable land management in the drylands: scientific connections in monitoring and assessing dryland degradation, climate change and biodiversity. Land Degrad Dev 22(2):248–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. FAO (2009) High level expert forum—how to feed the world in 2050. Office of the Director, Agricultural Development Economics Division, Economic and Social Development Department, RomeGoogle Scholar
  7. Fensholt R, Rasmussen K, Kaspersen P, Huber S, Horion S, Swinnen E (2013) Assessing land degradation/recovery in the African Sahel from long-term earth observation based primary productivity and precipitation relationships. Remote Sens 5(2):664–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. GEF (2014) EF-6 programming directions. GEF/R.6/20/Rev.04, 31 March 2014. Global Environment Facility, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Haigh MJ (2002) Land use, land cover and soil sciences—land rehabilitation, vol IV, Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). UNESCO-EOLSS, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, vol 1. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrmann SM, Tappan GG (2013) Vegetation impoverishment despite greening: a case study from central Senegal. J Arid Environ 90:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herrmann SM, Sall I, Sy O (2014) People and pixels in the Sahel: a study linking coarse-resolution remote sensing observations to land users’ perceptions of their changing environment in Senegal. Ecol Soc 19(3):29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hickler T, Eklundh L, Seaquist JW, Smith B, Ardö J, Olsson L, Sykes MT, Sjöström M (2005) Precipitation controls Sahel greening trend. Geophys Res Lett 32(21)Google Scholar
  15. Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C (2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8(1):23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hubert B, Rosegrant M, van Boekel M, Ortiz R (2010) The future of food: scenarios for 2050. Crop Sci 50(Suppl 1):33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kinzig AP, Ryan P, Etienne M, Allison H, Elmqvist T, Walker BH (2006) Resilience and regime shifts: assessing cascading effects. Ecol Soc 11(1):23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MEA (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystems and human well-being. Statement from the Board. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Full Report.
  20. Orr BJ (2011) Scientific review of the UNCCD provisionally accepted set of impact indicators to measure the implementation of strategic objectives 1, 2 and 3. Office of Arid Lands Studies. University of Arizona, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  21. Orr BJ (2014) Personal communication on: the use of normalized difference vegetation index for land degradation assessment—country applications. Interviewed on 13 Oct 2014Google Scholar
  22. Perrings C (1998) Resilience in the dynamics of economy-environment systems. Environ Resour Econ 11(3–4):503–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Porter JR, Xie L, Challinor A, Cochrane K, Mark Howden M, Iqbal MM, Lobell D, Travasso MT (2014) Food security and food production systems. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ et al (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Prince SD, Colstoun D, Brown E, Kravitz L (1998) Evidence from rain‐use efficiencies does not indicate extensive Sahelian desertification. Glob Chang Biol 4(4):359–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Renschler CS, Frazier A, Arendt L, Cimellaro G-P, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M (2010) A framework for defining and measuring resilience at the community scale: the PEOPLES resilience framework. MCEER, BuffaloGoogle Scholar
  26. Stocking M, Murnaghan N (2000) Land degradation–guidelines for field assessment. Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia, Norwich, p 121Google Scholar
  27. Strzepek K, Boehlert B (2010) Competition for water for the food system. Philos Trans R Soc, B 365(1554):2927–2940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thorén H, Persson J (2014) A concept of resilience for sustainability science: some remarks on ostensive and stipulative definitions. Soc Nat Resour 11(1):64–74Google Scholar
  29. Tilman D (2010) Understanding the present and projecting the future of global food demand. Paper presented at the AAAS Annual Meeting 2010, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  30. Tilman D, Cassman K, Matson P, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418(6898):671–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. UN (2013) World population prospects: the 2012 revision, highlights and advance tables. Working Paper, vol ESA/P/WP.228. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. UNEP (2007) Global environment outlook GEO4—environment for development. United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), NairobiGoogle Scholar
  33. UNEP (2012a) Environment for the future we want. In: GEO 5—Global Environment Outlook. United Nations Environment Programme, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  34. United Nations (2011) Millennium development goals report 2011. ISBN 978-92-1-101244-6. Accessed 1 Oct 2014
  35. Vacik H, Wolfslehner B, Seidl R, Lexer MJ (2007) Integrating the DPSIR approach and the analytic network process for the assessment of forest management strategies. In: Reynolds K, Thomson A, Köhl M, Shannon M, Ray D, Rennolls K (eds) Sustainable forestry: from monitoring and modelling to knowledge management and policy science. CAB International, Cambridge, pp 393–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vlek P, Le Q, Tamene L (2010) Assessment of land degradation, its possible causes and threat to food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Lal R, Stewart BA (eds) Food security and soil quality, Advances in soil science. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 57–86Google Scholar
  37. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social—ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Walker B, Abel N, Andreoni F, Cape J, Murdock H, Norman C (2014) General resilience: a discussion paper based on insights from a catchment management area workshop in South Eastern Australia. Resilience Alliance, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  39. Warren, A. 2002. Land degradation is contextual. Land Degradation & Development, 13(6), 449-459Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Genesis T. Yengoh
    • 1
  • David Dent
    • 2
  • Lennart Olsson
    • 1
  • Anna E. Tengberg
    • 1
  • Compton J. TuckerIII
    • 3
  1. 1.Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies - LUCSUSLundSweden
  2. 2.Chestnut Tree Farm, Forncett EndNorthfolkUK
  3. 3.Department of Hydrospheric and Biospheric SciencesNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA

Personalised recommendations