Skip to main content

Mechanical Microkeratomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corneal Transplantation

Abstract

During the last decade several techniques of lamellar keratoplasty (LK) have been developed with the purpose of retaining the advantages of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) while avoiding the removal of healthy portions of the cornea, thus selectively replacing the dysfunctional parts, limiting the rate of rejection, and increasing long-term graft stability. This chapter will review the different instruments and techniques to prepare donor tissue for endothelial keratoplasty (EK) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) foresees the transplantation of a donor graft consisting of endothelium, Descemet’s membrane, and a variable amount of posterior stroma in case of eyes with decompensated endothelium. In order to optimize visual rehabilitation, the present trend is toward minimizing the amount of stroma transplanted, and this can be done with both single- and double-cut procedures. DALK has been gaining popularity as the optimal approach for treating non-endothelial disorders affecting Bowman’s layer and stroma. Hand dissection of the stroma is technically difficult, and the quality of the surfaces obtained is rarely compatible with optimal vision, while pneumatic dissection technique as the “big bubble” is difficult to learn and can be complicated by micro-macro perforations making a conversion to PK necessary. As an alternative, microkeratome-assisted LK has the advantage of being a standardized, technically easy procedure, yielding extremely smooth dissected surfaces, therefore compatible with 20/20 vision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ward DE, Nesburn AB. An artificial anterior chamber. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;82:796–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong DW, Chan WK, Tan DT. Harvesting a lamellar graft from a corneoscleral button: a new technique. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:688–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barraquer JI. The history and evolution of keratomileusis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1996;36(4):1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Krumeich JH. Indications, techniques, and complications of myopic keratomileusis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1983;23(3):75–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Krumeich JH, Swinger CA. Nonfreeze epikeratophakia for the correction of myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;103(3, Pt II):397–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Slade SG, Updegraff SA. Advances in lamellar refractive surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1994;34(4):147–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Stathi EZ, Frenschock O, Georgiadis A. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Lasers Surg Med. 1990;10(5):463–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin GJ, Lyle WA. Initial results of automated lamellar keratoplasty for correction of myopia: one year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22(1):31–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schultze RL. Microkeratome update. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2002;42(4):55–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JK, Nkyekyer EW, Chuck RS. Microkeratome complications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(4):260–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobs JM, Taravella MJ. Incidence of intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:23–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakano K, Nakano E, Oliveira M, et al. Intraoperative microkeratome complications in 47,094 laser in situ keratomileusis surgeries. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:S723–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carrillo C, Chayet AS, Dougherty PJ, et al. Incidence of complications during flap creation in LASIK using the NIDEK MK-2000 microkeratome in 26,600 cases. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:S655–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yau CW, Cheng HC. Microkeratome blades and corneal flap thickness in LASIK. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008;39:471–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alio JL, Penero DP. Very high-frequency digital ultrasound measurement of the LASIK flap thickness profile using the intralase femtosecond laser and M2 and carriazo-pendular microkeratomes. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:12–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khachikian SS, Morason RT, Belin MW, et al. Thin head and single use microkeratomes reduce epithelial defects during LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:482–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Randleman JB, Lynn MJ, Banning CS, et al. Risk factors for epithelial defect formation during laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1738–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen YT, Tseng SH, Ma MC, et al. Corneal epithelial damage during LASIK: a review of 1873 eyes. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:916–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Albelda-Valles JC, Martin-Reyes C, Ramos F, et al. Effect of preoperative keratometric power on intraoperative complications in LASIK in 34,099 eyes. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:592–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Busin M, Patel AK, Scorcia V, et al. Microkeratome-assisted preparation of ultrathin grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:521–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Busin M, Madi S, Santorum P, et al. Ultrathin descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(6):1186–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Albé MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Albé, E., Busin, M. (2016). Mechanical Microkeratomes. In: Hjortdal, J. (eds) Corneal Transplantation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24052-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24052-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24050-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24052-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics