Abstract
This chapter presents a case study from a qualitative survey of 12 Walloon cities that received public grant from Walloon Region’s Minister of Health to organize actions inspired by the age-friendly cities and communities (AFCC) World Health Organization (WHO)’s framework. The aim of the chapter is to show how the AFCC framework can serve to local actors to pursue their own objectives, even if they have a little or poor knowledge of what AFCC might produce. The first section recalls the presence of the ‘municipality advisory councils of seniors’ (Conseils consultatifs communaux des aînés or CCCA) as a form of preexisting seniors’ social participation, i.e., before the AFCC experiment. It then explains how the WHO’s framework has been selectively adopted by regional public policy in 2012–2013. After the presentation of the research method in second section, the third part presents empirical data’s: first, it explores the profile’s diversity and experiences of three types of local actors involved into the processes (elected politicians, senior citizen representatives, and civil servants, the last one might be equivalent to “project management officer” in AFCC); second, it shows how problematic is the senior’s needs and resources assessment at local level for such actors; third, it presents the central role of local administration civil servants to give coherence to the senior’s social participation in practice. In conclusion, the chapter lays the milestones of a more realistic use of the AFCC framework by discussing the need to better articulate it to existing practices such as the CCCA or recent experiences of ‘participatory diagnosis.’
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Public social welfare center (CPAS in French, OCMW in Flemish) is the provider of social services entitled to everyone in Belgium. Situated at the level of municipality, it provides social services so that everyone can live with dignity. It investigates what help is most appropriate given the personal or family circumstances and offers the appropriate means to meet people’s needs.
- 2.
For a literature review on social participation, see the work of Emilie Raymond and her colleagues; for example, Raymond et al. (2008).
- 3.
Since 2009, PCSs are plans cofunded by the Walloon Region (up to 75 %) and by the municipalities (at least 25 %) in order to improve ‘social cohesion,’ as defined and promoted by the Council of Europe since 2000. Supporting local partnership according four different topics (socioprofessional integration; access to a decent housing; access to health; (re)creation of social intergenerational and intercultural links), these actions aim to meet the respect of six rights (under regional competence): the right to a dignified salary; the right to health protection and social/medical care; the right to a decent housing and healthy environment; the right to work; the right to training; and the right to cultural and social growth. Source: Walloon Public Services. (2014). Portail de la cohésion sociale. (Online). Available from http://cohesionsociale.wallonie.be. Accessed July 20, 2014.
- 4.
All translations from French-speaking sources are from the authors.
- 5.
Their study was financed by the “Coordination des Associations Seniors” (Coordination of Seniors Associations), which is the meeting of all most representative associations of seniors in Wallonia. This association also supports a similar study on the Region of Brussels (Carbonnelle 2013).
- 6.
The first author of this chapter has been designated as expert to participate in the evaluation jury of the projects funded by the call of the minister.
- 7.
For a critical perspective supporting the importance of seeing active ageing in everyday life, see the work of Aske J. Lassen through the example of seniors playing the billiard (Lassen 2014).
- 8.
Because the recognition of CCCA is optional at the municipality level, only half of Walloon municipalities have such councils (Casman and Chaoui-Mezabi 2011).
References
Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1988). À quoi tient le succès des innovations? 2: Le choix des porte-parole. Gérer et Comprendre, Annales Des Mines, 12, 14–29.
Argoud, D., & Puijalon, B. (1999). La parole des vieux. Enjeux, analyse, pratiques. Paris: Dunod.
Bacqué, M.-H., Rey, H., & Sintomer, Y. (2005). La démocratie participative, un nouveau paradigme pour l’action publique ? In M.-H. Bacqué, H. Rey, & Y. Sintomer (Eds.), Gestion de proximité et démocratie participative. Une perspective comparative (pp. 9–46). Paris: La Découverte.
Blondiaux, L., & Fourniau, J.-M. (2011). Un bilan des recherches sur la participation du public en démocratie : beaucoup de bruit pour rien ? Participation, 2011/1(1), 8–35.
Boudiny, K. (2013). “Active ageing”: From empty rhetoric to effective policy tool. Ageing and Society, 33(6), 1077–1098.
Buffel, T., McGarry, P., Phillipson, C., De Donder, L., Dury, S., De Witte, N., & Verté, D. (2014). Developing age-friendly cities: Case studies from brussels and manchester and implications for policy and practice. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 26, 52–72.
Carbonnelle, S. (2013). Enquête sur les Conseils Consultatifs Communaux des Aînés (CCCA) en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale réalisée par la Coordination des Associations de Seniors (CAS). Présentation des résultats et analyse. Bruxelles: CDCS.
Casman, M.-T., & Chaoui-Mezabi, D. (2011). Rapport d’étude des Conseils Consultatifs Communaux des Aînés (CCCA) en Région Wallonne. Université de Liège.
Cochoy, F. (2002). Sociologie du packaging. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Dearing, J. W. (2009). Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Intervention Development. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 503–518.
Garon, S., Paris, M., Beaulieu, M., Veil, A., & Laliberté, A. (2014). Collaborative partnership in age-friendly cities: Two case studies from Quebec, Canada. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 26(1–2), 73–87.
Garon, S., & Veil, A. (2011). Les Villes amies des aînés au Québec : un mouvement de changement à large échelle en faveur des aînés. Vie et Vieillissement, 9(1), 6–12.
Houioux, G., Vanlierde, A., & Storme, S. (2014). La participation n’a pas d’âge. Accompagnement d’un diagnostic de la qualité de vie et de la santé des aînés par un Conseil consultatif communal des Aînés. Éducation Santé, 299, 7–11.
Katz, S. (2000). Busy bodies: Activity, aging, and the management of everyday life. Journal of Aging Studies, 14(2), 135–152.
Lassen, A. J. (2014). Keeping disease at arm’s length—how older Danish people distance disease through active ageing. Ageing & Society, FirstView, 1–20. (Online). Available from http://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14000245. Accessed October 20, 2014.
Moulaert, T. (2012a). Gouverner les fins de carrière à distance. Outplacement et vieillissement actif en emploi. Bruxelles: Peter Lang.
Moulaert, T. (2012b). Pourquoi les francophones préfèrent-ils la sociologie du vieillissement à la gérontologie critique ? Gérontologie et Société, 142(3), 81–99.
Moulaert, T., & Biggs, S. (2013). International and European policy on work and retirement: Reinventing critical perspectives on active ageing and mature subjectivity. Human Relations, 66(1), 23–43.
Moulaert, T., & Garon, S. (2015). Researchers behind policy development: Comparing “Age-Friendly Cities” models in Quebec and Wallonia. Journal of Social Work and Practice, 29(1), 23–35.
Raymond, É., Gagné, D., Sévigny, A., & Tourigny, A. (2008). La participation sociale des aînés dans une perspective de vieillissement en santé. Réflexion critique appuyée sur une analyse documentaire. Québec: Direction de santé publique de l’Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Centre d’excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec et Institut sur le vieillissement et la participation sociale des aînés de l’Université Laval.
Walker, A., & Naegele, G. (1999). The politics of old age in Europe. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
WHO. (1986). Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. WHO.
WHO. (2002). Active ageing. A policy framework World Health Organization to the Second United Nations World Assembly on Ageing. Geneva: WHO.
WHO. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Geneva: WHO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moulaert, T., Houioux, G. (2016). A Belgian Case Study: Lack of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Knowledge and Social Participation Practices in Wallonia. In: Moulaert, T., Garon, S. (eds) Age-Friendly Cities and Communities in International Comparison. International Perspectives on Aging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24031-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24031-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24029-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24031-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)