Advertisement

Sun-Earth L1 and L2 to Moon Transfers Exploiting Natural Dynamics

Conference paper
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings book series (ASSSP, volume 44)

Abstract

This work examines the design of transfers from the Sun-Earth libration orbits, at the L1 and L2 points, towards the Moon using natural dynamics in order to assess the feasibility of future disposal or lifetime extension operations. With an eye to the probably small quantity of propellant left when its operational life has ended, the spacecraft leaves the libration point orbit on an unstable invariant manifold to bring itself closer to the Earth and Moon. The total trajectory is modeled in the coupled circular restricted three-body problem. The concept of survivability and event maps is introduced to obtain suitable conditions that can be targeted such that the spacecraft impacts, or is weakly captured by, the Moon. Weak capture at the Moon is studied by method of these maps. Some results for planar Lyapunov orbits at L1 and L2 are given, as well as some results for the operational orbit of SOHO.

Keywords

Libration Point Halo Orbit Jacobi Constant Lyapunov Orbit Libration Point Orbit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was done as part of a study for the European Space Agency named “End-Of-Life Disposal Concepts for Lagrange-Point and Highly Elliptical Orbit Missions” (Contract No. 4000107624/13/F/MOS). The authors would like to acknowledge the following team members that contributed to the ESA study: Camilla Colombo, Hugh Lewis, Francesca Letizia, Stefania Soldini, Elisa Maria Alessi, Alessandro Rossi, Linda Dimare, Massimo Vetrisano, and Markus Landgraf. The authors would like to thank Elisa Maria Alessi in particular for her provision of the orbital characteristics of SOHO’s operational orbit. This work was supported by the EC Marie Curie Network for Initial Training Astronet-II, Grant Agreement No. 289240.

References

  1. Belbruno, E.: Capture Dynamics and Chaotic Motions in Celestial Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Campagnola, S., Russell, R.P.: Endgame problem part 2: multibody technique and the Tisserand-Poincare graph. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 33, 476–486 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Canalias, E., Masdemont, J.J.: Computing natural transfers between Sun–Earth and Earth–Moon Lissajous libration point orbits. Acta Astronaut. 63, 238–248 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castelli, R.: On the relation between the bicircular model and the coupled circular restricted three-body problem approximation. In: Nonlinear and Complex Dynamics, pp. 53–68. Springer, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Conley, C.C.: Low energy transit orbits in the restricted three-body problems. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 16, 732–746 (1968)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. European Space Agency: Herschel portal (1995). http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Herschel/. Cited 15 Oct 2015
  7. Fantino, E., Gómez, G., Masdemont, J.J., Ren, Y.: A note on libration point orbits, temporary capture and low-energy transfers. Acta Astronaut. 67, 1038–1052 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. García, F., Gómez, G.: A note on weak stability boundaries. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 97 (2), 87–100 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Gómez, G., Llibre, J., Martínez, R., Simó, C.: Dynamics and Mission Design Near Libration Point Orbits—Volume 1: The Case of Collinear Libration Points. World Scientific, Singapore (2000a)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Gómez, G., Jorba, À., Masdemont, J.J., Simó, C.: Dynamics and Mission Design Near Libration Point Orbits—Volume 3: Advanced Methods for Collinear Points. World Scientific, Singapore (2000b)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Gómez G, Koon WS, Lo MW, Marsden JE, Masdemont J and Ross SD (2001) Invariant manifolds, the spatial three-body problem and space mission design. In: Astrodynamics 2001. Advances in Astronautical Sciences No.109, pp. 3–22. American Astronautical Society, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  12. Haapala, A.F., Howell, K.C.: Representations of higher-dimensional Poincaré maps with applications to spacecraft trajectory design. Acta Astronaut. 96, 23–41 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koon, W.S., Lo, M.W., Marsden, J.E., Ross, S.D.: Low energy transfer to the Moon. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 81, 63–73 (2001a)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Koon, W.S., Lo, M.W., Marsden, J.E., Ross, S.D.: Constructing a low energy transfer between Jovian moons. Contemp. Math. 292, 129–146 (2001b)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Lantoine, G., Russell, R.P., Campagnola, S.: Optimization of low-energy resonant hopping transfers between planetary moons. Acta Astronaut. 68, 1361–1378 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marsden, J., Ross, S.: New methods in celestial mechanics and mission design. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 43, 43–73 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. McGehee, R.P.: Some homoclinic orbits for the restricted three-body problem. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin (1969)Google Scholar
  18. Meyer, K., Hall, G., Offin, D.: Bifurcations of periodic orbits. In: Introduction to Hamiltonian Dynamical Systems and the N-Body Problem, pp. 271–299. Springer, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  19. Silva, P.A.S., Terra, M.O.: Applicability and dynamical characterization of the associated sets of the algorithmic weak stability boundary in the lunar sphere of influence. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 113, 141–168 (2012)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Szebehely, V.: Theory of Orbits: The Restricted Problem of Three Bodies. Academic, New York (1967)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Topputo, F., Belbruno, E., Gidea, M.: Resonant motion, ballistic escape, and their applications in astrodynamics. Adv. Space Res. 42, 1318–1329 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van der Weg, W.J., Vasile, M.: IAC-12-C1.4.8 high area-to-mass ratio hybrid propulsion earth to moon transfers in the CR3BP. In: 63rd International Astronautical Congress, Naples (2012)Google Scholar
  23. Villac, B.F., Scheeres, D.J.: Escaping trajectories in the Hill three-body problem and applications. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 26, 224–232 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wright, S.J., Nocedal, J.: Numerical Optimization, vol 2. Springer, New York (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Zielona GóraZielona GóraPoland
  2. 2.University of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations