Advertisement

Can Values Awareness Help Teachers and Parents Transition Preschool Learners into Mathematics Learning?

  • Alan J. BishopEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on different kinds of transitioning that young children do. These are transitioning from home to preschool, from home to school and from preschool to school. With each of these transitions, children may come into contact with different perspectives on mathematics. Six mathematical activities and six mathematical values are described as a way of conceptualising the possible differences young children might experience as they transition across different contexts. A call for more research in this area is made at the end of this chapter.

Keywords

Values Transitions Home to preschool Home to school Cultural conflicts 

References

  1. Abreu, G. de (2002). Towards a cultural psychology perspective on transitions between contexts of mathematical practices. In G. de Abreu, A. J. Bishop & N. C. Presmeg (Eds.), Transitions between contexts for mathematics learning (pp. 173–192). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  2. Abreu, G. de, Cline, T., & Shamsi, T. (2002). Exploring ways parents participate in their children’s school mathematics learning: Case studies in multi-ethnic primary schools. In G. de Abreu, A. J. Bishop & N. C. Presmeg (Eds.), Transitions between contexts for mathematics learning (pp.123–147). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. Ascher, M., & Ascher, R. (1997). Ethnomathematics. In A. B. Powell & M. Frankenstein (Eds.), Ethnomathematics: Challenging Eurocentrism in mathematics education (pp. 25–50). New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop, A. J. (1990). Western mathematics: The secret weapon of cultural imperialism. Race and Class, 32(2), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop, A. J. (1991). Teaching mathematics to ethnic minority pupils in secondary school. In D. Pimm & E. Love (Eds.), Teaching and learning school mathematics (pp. 26–43). London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  7. Bishop, A. J. (1994). Cultural conflicts in mathematics education: Developing a research agenda. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(2), 15–18.Google Scholar
  8. Bishop, A. J. (1999). Mathematics teaching and values education—An intersection in need of research. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 31(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bishop, A. J. (2001). What values do you teach when you teach mathematics? Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 346–349.Google Scholar
  10. Bishop, A. J. (2002a). The transition experience of immigrant secondary school students: Dilemmas and decisions. In G. de Abreu, A. J. Bishop, & N. C. Presmeg (Eds.), Transitions between contexts for mathematics learning (pp. 53–79). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bishop, A. J. (2002b, April). Research policy and practice: The case of values. Paper presented to the third conference of the Mathematics Education and Society Group, Helsingor, Denmark.Google Scholar
  12. Bishop, A. J. (2008). Teachers’ mathematical values for developing mathematical thinking in classrooms: Theory, research and policy. The Mathematics Educator, 11(1/2), 79–88.Google Scholar
  13. Bishop, A. J., Clarkson, P. C., FitzSimons, G. E., & Seah, W. T. (1999, December). Values in mathematics education: Making values teaching explicit in the mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the 25th Australian Association for Research in Education conference.Google Scholar
  14. Bishop, A. J., Seah, W. T., & Chin, C. (2003). Values in mathematics teaching: The hidden persuaders? In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leong (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 715–763). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. César, M., & Santos, N. (2006). From exclusion into inclusion: Collaborative work contributions to more inclusive learning settings. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XXI(3), 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Civil, M. (1998). Bridging in-school mathematics and out-of-school mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  17. Civil, M., & Andrade, R. (2002). Transitions between home and school mathematics: Rays of hope amidst the passing clouds. In G. de Abreu, A. J. Bishop, & N. C. Presmeg (Eds.), Transitions between contexts for mathematics learning (pp. 149–169). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarkson, P. C., Bishop, A. J., FitzSimons, G. E., & Seah, W. T. (2000). Challenges and constraints in researching values. In J. Bana & A. Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond 2000. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 188–195). Perth: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.Google Scholar
  19. Clarkson, P. C., Bishop, A., & Seah, W. T. (2010). Mathematics education and student values: The cultivation of mathematical wellbeing. In T. Lovat, R. Toomey, & N. Clement (Eds.), International research handbook on values education and student wellbeing (pp. 111–136). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44–48.Google Scholar
  21. FitzSimons, G. E., Seah, W. T., Bishop, A. J., & Clarkson, P. C. (2000). Conceptions of values and mathematics education held by Australian primary teachers: Preliminary findings from VAMP (Values And Maths Project). In W. -S. Hong & F. -L. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of the HPM 2000 conference, History in mathematics education: Challenges for the new millennium (Vol. II, pp. 163–171). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.Google Scholar
  22. Flecha, R., & Gómez, J. (2004). Participatory paradigms: Researching “with” rather than “on”. In B. Crossan, J. Gallacher, & M. Osborne (Eds.), Researching widening access: Issues and approaches in an international context (pp. 129–140). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Gerdes, P. (1997). Survey of current work on ethnomathematics. In A. B. Powell & M. Frankenstein (Eds.), Ethnomathematics: Challenging Eurocentrism in mathematics education (pp. 331–372). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  24. Goos, M., Jolly, L., & Kostogriz, A. (2005). Home, school and community partnerships for numeracy education in a remote Indigenous community. In M. Goos, C. Kanes, & R. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 176–186). Gold Coast: Griffith University.Google Scholar
  25. Gorgorio, N., Planas, N., & Vilella, X. (2002). Immigrant children learning mathematics in mainstream schools. In G. de Abreu, A. J. Bishop, & N. C. Presmeg (Eds.), Transitions between contexts for mathematics learning (pp. 23–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joseph, G. G. (1991). The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots of mathematics. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  27. Kirshner, D., & Whitson, J. A. (1997). Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Santos, M., & Matos, J. P. (2002). Thinking about mathematical learning with Cabo Verde ardinas. In G. de Abreu, A. J. Bishop, & N. C. Presmeg (Eds.), Transitions between contexts for mathematics learning (pp. 81–122). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seah, W. T. & Bishop, A. J. (2000). Researching values with migrant/expatriate teachers of mathematics. In J. Wakefield (Ed.), Shaping the future. Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematical Association of Victoria (pp. 348–355). Melbourne: Mathematical Association of Victoria.Google Scholar
  31. Stathopoulou, C. (2007). The way a Romany (Gipsy) community perceives space notions and some educational implications for Romany students. LIBEC Line—Revista em Literacia e Bem-Estar da Criança, 1(1), 32–41.Google Scholar
  32. Valero, P., & Vithal, R. (1998). Research methods from the “north” revisited from the “south”. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the International Study Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol 4, pp. 153–160). Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
  33. White, L. A. (1959). The Evolution of Culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations